TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

Amma Usman

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 7, 2024
1,234
1,434
any advice on how to answer this latham question: 'Please give details of your extra-curricular activities, and any prizes, scholarships, positions of responsibility, or noteworthy achievements that will support your application. (300 words)'

Hey @hazanelson , I recall answering questions like this just as the question presents itself. For example, you will need to touch on one of these listed details first (extra-curriculars, prizes, etc), and then link it to the firm (its trainee qualities, and so on). The latter is very important as the question states “that will support your application”, so the tailored approach is very much needed. I know that Latham prides itself on its one-firm culture, and entrepreneurial spirit, among other values. Thus, it’s worth tailoring those fine details to these.
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: The-PFO-Collector

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,436
I am applying for a Direct TC for a firm that I had an AC with last year. How do I leverage this in my application?
I think the best way is to leverage interactions you have had during the AC. Just as you might mention a conversation with a trainee at an open day to support one of your points, you can mention a conversation with a partner/associate in an interview. This might be especially valuable if they gave you some deeper insight when you asked questions around your main points of interest in the firm - it will neatly fit in with your 'why the firm' reasons and will demonstrate your desire to continuously learn about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hfbjsdhfbhf

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,436
any advice on how to answer this latham question: 'Please give details of your extra-curricular activities, and any prizes, scholarships, positions of responsibility, or noteworthy achievements that will support your application. (300 words)'
Just to add to @Amma Usman's great response, I think you should aim to write 2-3 paragraphs using this easy to follow structure:
  1. Explain the story of a selected extracurricular/prize/achievement/etc using the usual STAR structure. To the extent possible, quantify your achievement at the 'Results' stage.
  2. Explain how the selected extracurricular/prize/achievement/etc demonstrates a skill/attribute/etc.
  3. Explain how that skill/attribute is relevant for the work of a trainee in commercial law, and if you can make particular reference to the tasks and responsibilities trainees are usually working on.
  4. To the extent possible, explain how that skill is particularly useful at a firm like Latham. Try to make links to any of the firm's unique selling points and main practice area strengths (PE, banking & finance, capital markets, corporate M&A).
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,436
If your application and tests etc get you to latter stages of an application are they looked at again or if you have gotten to AC at that stage is it merely performance there that counts.

The main reason I am asking is that I see the depth and length at some of the admin suggested answers which simply do not fit in to 300 or 250 or similar word answers especially if you add in how it relates to you. If you discuss at length one area is it not to the detriment of your application to show you are well rounded?

I am having a good hit rate at getting to AC (but haven't converted to a VS yet). So are my application form answers good enough or just good enough to progress but if looked at again later not good enough? (If that makes sense).
Hey @3000to1shoteverytime that's a great question. For almost every firm I know (with the exception of a very select few that really emphasize grades or WG results), once you got to the AC stage progression is 99% down to AC performance. I have not heard of any firm that still considers application form answers at this stage. At most, a partner or graduate recruiter could skim through them before an interview, but that would be just to get a glimpse into your motivations and experiences, and even that is quite rare. As such, while I still encourage you to make sure your written applications are of a very high quality, you shouldn't worry about any influence to your post-AC progression chances.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,436
Hi @Andrei Radu @Ram Sabaratnam @Amma Usman!

I was hoping to understand what might be the most optimal discussion point for why you choose this firm's levfin practice area. This is for the Latham app, which I am unsure of what I should talk about.

Trawling through the forums, I know to talk about (a) client focus, (b) industry focus, or (c) market focus, but Latham's levfin team is quite similar to other firms in all three of these markets. For example, they are similar to K&E, P,W, and Weil for their large-cap deals, but similar to DLA, HL, Macs for their mid-market work as well. They are similar in their market focus to Weil and CC as they target IBs, private credit, and PE sponsors, so that also makes them similar, and finally, all of these firms' London office works on multi-jurisdictional deals specifically in the EMEA region.

So it seems to be difficult to answer "why train at Latham over its competitors?" if the firm is similar to others. I understand it is asking specifically why I would train at the firm, but it seems very difficult to clearly explain why Latham does different work to its competitors when the levfin market seems to be highly commoditised.

Appreciate the help!
Hey @svb risk management intern and thanks for the great question. Just to add to @Amma Usman's excellent response, I think finding the 'unique' part of Latham's leveraged finance practice that you can tie your motivation to is easier than you would think. Basically, I think you have already done the job yourself, but you just need to shift your perspective as to what makes a great 'Why the firm' answer.

As Amma pointed out, it is very rare to find out anything unique about a firm's practice at a broad level, so you need to find a more specific and niche subpart to tie your reasoning too. However, even that can be quite difficult to find. Intuitively, you have already attempted to do so, by going beyond ascertaining "practice area strength" and looking into three more specific parts of the practice: (a) client focus, (b) industry focus, and (c) market focus. You have done well to have identified where Latham sits in the market in each, but you have found that none makes the firm truly unique, as there are rivals for each market segment even in these more niche categories. Nonetheless, the information you have gathered, taken as a whole, does make Latham unique. While if you were to take any of (a) or (b) or (c) separately it would have not sufficed, if you explain that what motivates you to train at Latham is that the lev fin team has (a) and (b) and (c), then it will - for none of the identified firms is great for both large-cap and mid-market deals and also has the same market focus as Latham. Sure, you will need to use some extra word count to explain why you want all these three aspects in your ideal leveraged finance team (besides also explaining your general interest in the practice) but that should not be that difficult to achieve - you probably already have some motivation you can tie to each individual point.

Finally, I wanted to mention that this applies at a broader level for writing a great 'Why the firm' answer. For instance, say you did not want to spend so much word count on just a leveraged finance motivation. Say you went ahead with a simple 'Latham has exceptional expertise in high-end lev fin work' reason for why the firm. That would indeed not suffice for specificity, as this point would equally apply to firms like Kirkland, Paul, Weiss and Milbank. However, that does not mean this added no value. This reason excludes the vast majority of other firms. Now, if you can supplement this first motivation with another one or two that excludes the few firms reason 1 equally applies to, taken as a whole your 'Why the firm' reasoning will apply to no other as well as to Latham. Examples of unique selling points of Latham that differentiate it from rivals with very strong PE/lev fin practices include: strong contentious teams and a more full service London offering, an increasingly strong corporate M&A team, exceptional capital markets expertise, and arguably a more collaborative firm-wide culture. The point to remember is that you should try to make use of reasons conjunctively rather than disjunctively. Think of 'why firm' reasons as 'firm selection criteria': your only job is to make sure no other firm scores as well in all of those criteria, not that no other firm scores as well in any specific criterion.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,436
Does grad recruitment tend to take in overall appearance during VI's? Like if the content of my answers are good but I stumble over my words once or twice, or have to take a second to continue?
I think recruiters focus the most on ascertaining whether you have sensible substantive points and on whether you can communicate them properly. As such, the way you go about articulating your thoughts does play a factor, but as long as your points are good and overall clearly expressed it's not a major consideration. Stumbling once or twice is definitely not a big deal, it is a lot more common than you think. I progressed in VIs in which I struggled significantly more in terms showcasing clear and composed communication.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,436
Yeah, GD only recruits through vac schemes. I'm just really nervous tbh, i know they test more commercial awareness and general abilities but then also some of the questions on glassdoor are stressing me out. Someone said they got asked "what makes GD different to Cleary and Linklaters?" Is this likely to be cos that applicant said they also applied to those firms, or just randomly? Because I could answer that compared to other firms i applied to but definitely not with random ones. Does anyone have advice?
While I do not know the context in which this question was asked, I would say based on my own interview experience that it wouldn't be impossible to be asked something like this even if you have not applied to these other firm. The interviewer may want to test your ability to think on the spot about comparisons and issues you may not have considered before and also to test your broader knowledge of the legal market in London.

To answer it, firstly you definitely want to know what are the main firm 'types' - ie Magic Circle/SC/etc but also large/mid/small offices of US firms and also further differentiations between any big practice area/sector focuses - ie 'transactional' and 'disputes' firms. While you need not have a lot of specific knowledge about any of the firms within the broader groups, you need to know the main features associated with these categories. Thus, even if you do not know much about Linklaters, you should be able to different it from GD merely by knowing what makes a firm 'Magic Circle': long history at the pinnacle of the legal market in England and deep ties with UK corporates; top of the market strengths across the spectrum of a full service offering; an expanded network of international offices; a structured training style; large trainee cohorts etc. The same points of differentiation will appear if the interviewer asks about Clifford Chance, Freshfields or A&O Shearman.

Secondly, you need to know the unique selling points of GD and its practice area strengths, and you need to know what other firms those unique selling points/practice area strengths also apply to. If you have found a specific enough conjunction of why GD reasons, there should be no other firm they equally apply to and thus you should always have at least one point of differentiation - with Cleary, maybe the firms have in common strengths in cross-border disputes and mid-sized London offices; but Clearly does not have GD's market recognition for corporate M&A.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,436
Does anybody have insight into whether Davis Polk is highly selective when it comes to academic grades, meaning that successful applicants are likely to have at least a first-class degree or a strong 2.1?
The firm indicated that they expect successful candidates to be on track for/have achieved a high 2.1, but that they will take into account mitigating circumstances and that therefore this is not an absolute requirement.
 

AnAnonymousDuck

Valued Member
Sep 21, 2024
121
92
While I do not know the context in which this question was asked, I would say based on my own interview experience that it wouldn't be impossible to be asked something like this even if you have not applied to these other firm. The interviewer may want to test your ability to think on the spot about comparisons and issues you may not have considered before and also to test your broader knowledge of the legal market in London.

To answer it, firstly you definitely want to know what are the main firm 'types' - ie Magic Circle/SC/etc but also large/mid/small offices of US firms and also further differentiations between any big practice area/sector focuses - ie 'transactional' and 'disputes' firms. While you need not have a lot of specific knowledge about any of the firms within the broader groups, you need to know the main features associated with these categories. Thus, even if you do not know much about Linklaters, you should be able to different it from GD merely by knowing what makes a firm 'Magic Circle': long history at the pinnacle of the legal market in England and deep ties with UK corporates; top of the market strengths across the spectrum of a full service offering; an expanded network of international offices; a structured training style; large trainee cohorts etc. The same points of differentiation will appear if the interviewer asks about Clifford Chance, Freshfields or A&O Shearman.

Secondly, you need to know the unique selling points of GD and its practice area strengths, and you need to know what other firms those unique selling points/practice area strengths also apply to. If you have found a specific enough conjunction of why GD reasons, there should be no other firm they equally apply to and thus you should always have at least one point of differentiation - with Cleary, maybe the firms have in common strengths in cross-border disputes and mid-sized London offices; but Clearly does not have GD's market recognition for corporate M&A.
This might sound like a really silly question, but if I was asked about a firm that i had never heard of in my life and didn't know anything about, what would be the best response? Would asking for more info from the interview be an absolute no-no or is it just best to admit defeat and say "I don't know that firm"?
 

theone132213

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2024
20
8
Does anyone have tips for answering an app question on setbacks and overcoming them?
I’m struggling to identify what they mean exactly by a setback- would a challenging scenario suffice, or do you have to have failed? This is for Ashurst if that helps.

Any help much appreciated :)
 

theone132213

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2024
20
8
Does anyone have insight into whether Pinset Masons prefer bullet points or prose for their work experience section? Also any insights on their online assessment? Thank you
I think I remember them saying prose is fine. As for the test, it entails an SJT + Verbal + Numerical test followed by a written task and then a VI. The written task and VI will only be looked at if you pass their benchmark on the initial test ( but you complete them all back to back).
 

-legal-

Esteemed Member
Premium Member
Jul 5, 2023
77
79
Hi @Amma Usman @Jessica Booker ,
Would this section also include positions of responsibility and if it doesn't is it fine if I only add my non academic interests as I can't think of anything else.

Please use this section to tell us anything else that you feel would support your application. Examples can include, but are not limited to, key achievements, successes, non academic interests, your skills etc.
Max 300 words
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amma Usman

addy2004

Legendary Member
Premium Member
  • Nov 28, 2023
    126
    239
    Does anyone have tips for answering an app question on setbacks and overcoming them?
    I’m struggling to identify what they mean exactly by a setback- would a challenging scenario suffice, or do you have to have failed? This is for Ashurst if that helps.

    Any help much appreciated :)
    From my experience, the setback needs to be an actual 'setback' (so more of a 'failure'), and then you can explain what steps you took to overcome it and what you have learned etc. This shows more growth, development and awareness in yourself, rather than using an example of a setback that isn't really as serious/many people have encountered (eg rejections). What I'm trying to say is don't be afraid to use a more personal example to write a compelling answer - how you explain your growth is what matters.
     

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.