TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

Amma Usman

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 7, 2024
584
511

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
426
631
Thank you, Andrei! I really appreciate your thoughtful response. The six month NY secondment at Davis Polk sounds very interesting - the firm's stature in the US market is a huge attraction for me. If I may ask two questions:
1. What made you choose Davis Polk over the other three firms you received TCs for?
2. In your opinion, which aspects of your application were the most decisive in receiving a TC at Davis Polk? I haven't had the opportunity to interact with the firm at all so I'd feel hesitant for my first interaction with the firm to be an application. I've attended lots of online events for UK, US etc. firms (selective + non-selective) but I'm not sure if that (coupled with detailed research of Davis Polk, commercial awareness etc.) would suffice?

Thank you for your kindness + insight.
1. There wasn't just one singular reason why I ended up choosing Davis Polk, it was more that the firm scored best on most of my relevant selection criteria:
  • Client relationships and quality of work: the firm's US reputation, and especially its long standing institutional relationships in Wall Street, was an important consideration. For US firms in London a big part of their work will originate from clients in the US, so their renown there is a crucial (though often overlooked) factor to consider if you want to work on the highest end mandates.
  • Small but extremely efficient corporate practice in London: Davis Polk's London corporate team is very lean compared to most rivals, with competitors with the same Chambers M&A and equity capital markets rankings having teams from double to 4/5 times the headcount. That suggests that the firm's individual practitioners are extremely efficient, which is further evidenced by the rankings in The Lawyer's Corporate Efficiency report. In 2023 Davis Polk was first by a significant margin and in 2024 it came second only after Paul, Weiss (a firm whose efficiency rankings may have been propelled by their hiring spree), and had the best/second best revenue per corporate lawyer and revenue per corporate partner figures in both years. This quality-focused approach is illustrated in the firm's average deal value figures as well: while Davis Polk works on a significantly lower number of transactions than a Latham or Kirkland, the average value of a mandate the firm works on is around three times higher - in fact, in 2023 it was the highest in the world. As at this point I knew I wanted to be a corporate lawyer and to work in a lean team, this very quality-focused strategy was attractive to me.
  • Seat rotation structure: Davis Polk's pinpointed corporate-finance focus and small size means that the firm foes not operate the usual strict 4 seats rotation structure. Instead, the process is a lot more "conversational" and it is not uncommon to do even 3 seats in corporate if you want to. Since I know this is the area I want to work in, this system was a lot more attractive for me than a more conventional and broader training experience.
  • Strong financials and growth plan: Davis Polk has historically been leading global average PEP rankings, in the last 5 and 10 years having the 3rd average PEP per year in the world (only behind Wachtell and Kirkland). This signals a very successful business model, which allows the firm to make substantial investments when appropriate. This enabled Davis Polk to begin a period of expansion in London while keeping a very high quality-focused approach - its recent lateral hires only include Chambers-ranked star partners, poached from Paul Hastings, Sidley, and A&O Shearman; something that rival firms with a weaker financial position might not have been capable of.
2. I am generally of the view once again that there is never one factor you should think leads to success, and consequently my strategy has been to try to score well in all the relevant assessment criteria rather than to try to be absolutely impressive in any given one. However, if I were to say one thing which I think distinguished me the most in my Davis Polk application and later in my VS I would say it was knowledge of the firm in the context of the broader biglaw legal market. Explaining exactly what different practice areas do and what their work looks like at different levels, what the firm's leading practices are and how they compare to that of rivals beyond Chambers rankings, and what position their firm as a whole occupies in the market is very impressive for a recruiter. It shows passion for researching this career in detail over a long period of time, which is the best evidence that you are a good fit for it.
 

Amma Usman

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 7, 2024
584
511
Hey TCLA Community,

I hope you’re all having a FAB weekend!

I have seen a number of posts recently relating to the percentile of candidates firms recruit from either VS’ or TCs.

I’ve linked a thread by @Ram Sabaratnam below which covers so much of the info you need to know regarding this ;


Have a lovely rest of the weekend !
 

3000to1shoteverytime

Valued Member
Dec 9, 2023
120
133
If your application and tests etc get you to latter stages of an application are they looked at again or if you have gotten to AC at that stage is it merely performance there that counts.

The main reason I am asking is that I see the depth and length at some of the admin suggested answers which simply do not fit in to 300 or 250 or similar word answers especially if you add in how it relates to you. If you discuss at length one area is it not to the detriment of your application to show you are well rounded?

I am having a good hit rate at getting to AC (but haven't converted to a VS yet). So are my application form answers good enough or just good enough to progress but if looked at again later not good enough? (If that makes sense).
 

Amma Usman

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 7, 2024
584
511
I'm doing the Eversheds Sutherland application and there is a work experience section and a separate position of responsibility/extra curricular section. I do not have that many extra curricular activities, because I worked 32 hours a week throughout all of university. Would it be worth mentioning running a business for a short period (selling an e-guide with tutorials on making traditional dresses), even thought it was 3 years ago? I am also using this example for the "quality" question just in a lot more detail about the process. I am going to mention organising charity events but other than that I do not have much. Do you think this would put me at a disadvantage.

Hiya @cjwx ,

I strongly believe that you are in no way at a disadvantage. In fact, you have done a lot of really excellent stuff during this period to put in an application.

I want to emphasise that extra-curriculars mean so much more to recruiters than mooting competitions, society participations, etc. Those are certainly great too, but the term extra-curriculars covers, essentially, anything you do outside your free time. Running a business, being self-employed, starting your own venture, all have the potential to help you leverage a lot of skills that law firms - and in fact, any employer, will highly value. For example, what challenges did you face whilst setting up? How did you overcome them? Notice how this on its own brings out two competencies - resilience and problem solving.

The exact timing you executed this doesn’t matter - you had still accomplished it at some point in your life and that is worth celebrating and including in an application. Even organising charity events, which I’m sure you had thoroughly enjoyed doing, shows a passion for the community and this can be likened to the wider pro bono efforts firms engage in.

I would also note that it is not enough to mention positions of responsibilities and extra curriculars without linking it to the core values and competencies the firm looks for in trainees. To find this out, check the firm‘s grad rec website, speak to future trainees, lawyers at the firm, etc. This will place you as a candidate that not only HAS value, but one that can BRING value. At the end of the day, this is what matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tintin06

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
426
631
I just did a SJT, and I got within the highest bracket for "applied verbal intellect" and in the lowest bracket for "numerical" should I assume a PFO?
I would definitely not simply assume that. The way SJTs are designed, most candidates will often have a lowest scoring bracket. Moreover, if you ask me, (i) applied verbal intellect is very relevant for the practice of trainees, as your basic tasks will always revolve around reasoning around texts; and (ii) numerical skills, though sometimes useful, are comparatively a very minor part of the job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: g.cl.2020344

hazanelson

Active Member
Premium Member
Nov 1, 2024
13
7
any advice on how to answer this latham question: 'Please give details of your extra-curricular activities, and any prizes, scholarships, positions of responsibility, or noteworthy achievements that will support your application. (300 words)'
 

Rus

Active Member
Apr 26, 2024
12
18
Hello! Hope everyone is well! For the Latham application, do they review the application SJT and VI holistically or do they put more emphasis on a specific part for example VI or SJT? (Hope it makes sense haha)
Not sure if this helps but I remember in one of their career events they said they'll first consider whether you met the test benchmark, then they'd screen the application, and if it's good they'll look at the video interview and decide whether to progress you. They said it's more of a checklist than anything
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.