TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

ayiiii05

Valued Member
Nov 10, 2023
102
219
I would rule out Covington.They only select 50ish to interview stage and that’s overlooked by partners grades etc are taken into account. Unless they do 2 batches I’ve given up hope. Ashurst is a rejection they’re dragging the process on. They could’ve rejected applicants post test if their results weren’t up to scratch.
for the others I don’t believe HL has given any AC’s out as of yet.
I'm so annoyed with Ashurst for this. I would tell them off directly if I were an heiress of a multi-million-pound business, but for now, I will rant about them here lmao
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
241
352
Why am I the opposite to everybody here? Never practiced the WG in my life but yet never failed one ever. Genuinely find it mostly easy - have scored 99th percentile for CC and 94th for Linklaters. Yet I was rejected for both because my application writing and interviewing skills are absolutely horrendous.

Basically using this to moan because apparently all my god given skill points were used to max out the bloody Watson Glaser Test of all things, leaving me a talentless hack in everything else 😭

EDIT: And I can't even help people get better because I don't know what I do. I've never looked at a study resource or anything - I have no working out to show. Anyone know of any firms' application process that are just 5 WG tests? 🥲
It may not be quite what you are looking for, but I heard Linklaters places a lot of emphasis on WG/SJT results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KBanana

Ram Sabaratnam

Valued Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 7, 2024
108
217
Why am I the opposite to everybody here? Never practiced the WG in my life but yet never failed one ever. Genuinely find it mostly easy - have scored 99th percentile for CC and 94th for Linklaters. Yet I was rejected for both because my application writing and interviewing skills are absolutely horrendous.

Basically using this to moan because apparently all my god given skill points were used to max out the bloody Watson Glaser Test of all things, leaving me a talentless hack in everything else 😭

EDIT: And I can't even help people get better because I don't know what I do. I've never looked at a study resource or anything - I have no working out to show. Anyone know of any firms' application process that are just 5 WG tests? 🥲


Hey @Parsorandini! Just building on what @Andrei Radu aptly pointed out (I've heard similar things myself) 👀

It's great that you're able to score so high on the Watson Glaser. Scoring in the 99th and 94th percentiles isn’t something many people can say, so it’s clear you have some serious strengths to build on. I’m confident you have what it takes to be successful in other parts of the application process too! If you’re finding it challenging to approach written applications, video interviews, or assessment centres, don’t hesitate to ask questions here on the forum. Andrei, @Amma Usman and @Jessica Booker consistently offer excellent advice on application writing and interviewing. I've also been in the same boat and would be more than happy to share tips or help with specific areas! Best of luck with other applications, you Watson Glaser genius!
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
241
352

James Wakefield

Active Member
Oct 7, 2024
16
13
Why am I the opposite to everybody here? Never practiced the WG in my life but yet never failed one ever. Genuinely find it mostly easy - have scored 99th percentile for CC and 94th for Linklaters. Yet I was rejected for both because my application writing and interviewing skills are absolutely horrendous.

Basically using this to moan because apparently all my god given skill points were used to max out the bloody Watson Glaser Test of all things, leaving me a talentless hack in everything else 😭

EDIT: And I can't even help people get better because I don't know what I do. I've never looked at a study resource or anything - I have no working out to show. Anyone know of any firms' application process that are just 5 WG tests? 🥲
I can relate- I actually like doing the Watson Glaser, it’s my favourite test.

The one I cannot stand though is Artic Shores game-based assessments. They really suck!
 

studentdelaw786

Distinguished Member
Sep 11, 2019
57
61
I agree with this - I generally don't see any firms with two names shortening it, the firm's with three or more tend to shorten it themselves in one format or another, and then I advise to go with that format.

If you are worried about word count, there is typically many more ways you can shorten your writing elsewhere than potentially shortening the firm's name in a way it doesn't use/isn't commonly used in the legal sector.
thank you kindly! @Jessica Booker @Andrei Radu
 

sammm10101

Distinguished Member
Aug 15, 2024
68
137
uuuu I am not a fan of two-pronged questions, e.g. 'What steps have you taken to research a career as a solicitor at an international law firm? What appeals to you about this career?'. This is one question for HFW, yet I really want to take the second point in a direction which doesn't really align that well with the first part. Just let me do both pleeaase
 
Hi @pleasepleaseplease I definitely think it is a good idea to write you want to learn more about practice areas that interest you. The only caveat to that is to make sure that the practices you choose to write about are some of the bigger ones in the London office and ideally some of the ones the firm is known for in the market (which you can ascertain by taking a look at their Chambers UK and Chambers Global rankings).

Besides that, I think it is in general a good idea to identify the firm's unique selling points (USPs) - be them related to practice areas, culture, training or international offices - and explain you want to learn more about them. Some of the USPs identified by the TCLA team in HFW's Firm Profile (which you can access here) also include:
  • Sector-focused firm, with a particularly strong reputation for shipping and commodities
  • Inherently global practice, with lots of opportunity for cross-border work
  • Disputes-heavy firm, with high rankings for their contentious teams
Thank you so much!
 
Why am I the opposite to everybody here? Never practiced the WG in my life but yet never failed one ever. Genuinely find it mostly easy - have scored 99th percentile for CC and 94th for Linklaters. Yet I was rejected for both because my application writing and interviewing skills are absolutely horrendous.

Basically using this to moan because apparently all my god given skill points were used to max out the bloody Watson Glaser Test of all things, leaving me a talentless hack in everything else 😭

EDIT: And I can't even help people get better because I don't know what I do. I've never looked at a study resource or anything - I have no working out to show. Anyone know of any firms' application process that are just 5 WG tests? 🥲
On the plus side you will be able to improve your written applications and interview skills more easily than trying to better a WG score.
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.