The exact same salary for much better hours. Count me in too!Hence my reason for being drawn to employment law (employer side).
Hey Guest, do you have a question for graduate recruitment? Gemma Baker from Willkie is live to answer your questions!
The exact same salary for much better hours. Count me in too!Hence my reason for being drawn to employment law (employer side).
Hi Jessica, thank you for your reply - that was really helpful! My course is anticipated to end on the 30th of June so I'm assuming this would indicate that my visa would be valid through till September?You will usually get up to three months after your course is completed where you can stay in the UK on your student visa. So your eligibility for summer vacation schemes will depend on when your course finishes. If your course hasn't officially concluded/finished, eligibility might be tricky as you will be limited to working 20 hours a week. If the scheme starts or ends three months after your course finishes, you would need to secure another visa.
Another student visa would only be possible if you were going on to further study. You can apply for the post-study visa (graduate visa) though that will give you up to two years of being able to work and live in the UK with few restrictions. Many international candidates apply for and secure this visa to allow them to work after their studies have finished: https://www.gov.uk/graduate-visa
Most likely yes - I can't provide specific advice on your individual situation though, and you should check your visa's status and end date as this will be subject to how long you have held your student visa for.Hi Jessica, thank you for your reply - that was really helpful! My course is anticipated to end on the 30th of June so I'm assuming this would indicate that my visa would be valid through till September?
US aint the one for you my brother/sister/them in Christ.What are people’s thoughts on the US firms’ working hours, I’m curious? If I see legal cheek reporting an average finish time beyond 8pm I don’t apply to a firm. I’m not against working hard but I want a life.
Hi @pleasepleaseplease I definitely think it is a good idea to write you want to learn more about practice areas that interest you. The only caveat to that is to make sure that the practices you choose to write about are some of the bigger ones in the London office and ideally some of the ones the firm is known for in the market (which you can ascertain by taking a look at their Chambers UK and Chambers Global rankings).Hi @Andrei Radu, I am applying to HFW's Open Day. Please could you provide any guidance on how to answer 'What interests you about HFW and what are you hoping to learn more about on our Open Day?'
Would writing about their practice areas that interest me and an opportunity to gain further insight into those be a good idea? Along with that and the culture at the firm, if there is anything else I should consider, please let me know!
I would definitely not go for DP, I haven't seen that acronym used at all in reference to the firm. DPW is a bit more tricky, as sometimes people do informally refer to the firm as such. However, since the firm does not refer to itself in this way, and since the reputable legal press does not either, I would not risk it.For anyone applying to Davis Polk’s Insight Day:
are you guys shortening the firm’s name to DPW or DP to save words, or is it recommended to not do that?
@Andrei Radu - would love to get your thoughts on this, please.
thank you!
I agree with this - I generally don't see any firms with two names shortening it, the firm's with three or more tend to shorten it themselves in one format or another, and then I advise to go with that format.I would definitely not go for DP, I haven't seen that acronym used at all in reference to the firm. DPW is a bit more tricky, as sometimes people do informally refer to the firm as such. However, since the firm does not refer to itself in this way, and since the reputable legal press does not either, I would not risk it.
While it will only cut one word instead of two, I would just refer to the firm as 'Davis Polk' after using the full 'Davis Polk & Wardwell' in the first sentence.
Did they mention when people should expect to hear back re. WVS?I’m currently attending the W&C virtual event- grad team said they sent out invites for the first open day (14 Nov) today and will send out outcomes for the 2nd open day (21 Nov) later this week
Hi, did W&C’s grad rec team say anything about when we should expect to hear back for WVS applications following the VI?I’m currently attending the W&C virtual event- grad team said they sent out invites for the first open day (14 Nov) today and will send out outcomes for the 2nd open day (21 Nov) later this week
Nope, just said they received a lot of applications and working through them allDid they mention when people should expect to hear back re. WVS?
They said soon! Didn't specify whenHi, did W&C’s grad rec team say anything about when we should expect to hear back for WVS applications following the VI?
Latham open day rejection, anyone have any insight if it’s still worth applying for the vacation scheme?
I would rule out Covington.They only select 50ish to interview stage and that’s overlooked by partners grades etc are taken into account. Unless they do 2 batches I’ve given up hope. Ashurst is a rejection they’re dragging the process on. They could’ve rejected applicants post test if their results weren’t up to scratch.Guys I am beginning to really stress about my winter vac scheme applications.
Dechert- done by written assessment almost 3 weeks ago and no news
W &C- Applied in September but no comms since then
H&L- Applied in September but no comms since then (done the Waton Glacier test)
Covington- No comms since application
Ashirst- No come since application
should I assume I have been rejected from the ones I haven't heard from since application cos some people on here have done AC's for the firms already!!
Looks like it’s a W&C open day rejection 😭I’m currently attending the W&C virtual event- grad team said they sent out invites for the first open day (14 Nov) today and will send out outcomes for the 2nd open day (21 Nov) later this week
I'm so annoyed with Ashurst for this. I would tell them off directly if I were an heiress of a multi-million-pound business, but for now, I will rant about them here lmaoI would rule out Covington.They only select 50ish to interview stage and that’s overlooked by partners grades etc are taken into account. Unless they do 2 batches I’ve given up hope. Ashurst is a rejection they’re dragging the process on. They could’ve rejected applicants post test if their results weren’t up to scratch.
for the others I don’t believe HL has given any AC’s out as of yet.