Hey Guest, do you have a question for graduate recruitment? Gemma Baker from Willkie is live to answer your questions!
Hi @bella98 I just wanted to add my perspective to @Ram Sabaratnam's excellent points and to also use the opportunity to do a bit of overanalysis of the 'theory' behind an optimal 'why commercial law' answer. I think there are essentially two ways you can make a 'intersection of business and law' reasoning work. One of them, as Ram explained, is to focus on the intersection directly. Essentially, this means looking at the most important features of work that involves both commercial and legal thinking and explaining how that attracts you. The advantage of such an approach is that it is very direct, clear, and will not take up a lot of word count. The disadvantage is that it will likely not in itself be sufficiently specific to justify your choice of law over any other career. For instance, say you make your point about how the work of a commercial solicitor involves a lot of collaboration with sophisticated parties like opposing counsel, bankers, consultants and so on. And this is a good thing to mention. This reasoning explains, for instance, why you prefer a career as a commercial solicitor to one as an academic or sole legal practitioner. From the point of view of the recruiter, writing about this collaboration-centered interest restricts the field of potential career options compatible with your fundamental motivations. However, it does not restrict it to only commercial law and nothing else. Investment banking and consulting for instance require similar levels of collaboration. And this problem persists with a number of other commonly-cited motivations, such as a desire to work in a client-facing role or to use analytic skills for problem solving.@Ram Sabaratnam I recall you previously mentioned avoiding the generic response, 'I am interested in both law and business,' when addressing the question of why I chose commercial law. I typically prefer a structured approach to these types of questions where I write three key points, starting with how my interest in the field began and so on. Could the intersection of law and business be one of those points, or does that come across as too broad? The reason I ask is that I studied law and also ran a small business, so I often incorporate that into my answer as one of the key points. Thank youu
Heya sorry to hear this! Which state did you get to from PWC? I’m waiting to hear back post AC
Yes - you could include this detail in this section if it is a course or qualification.@Ram Sabaratnam @Jessica Booker
On the Vantage application portal, it states "Please add any supplementary educational information including extra study and international qualifications". Would it be appropriate to mention a language course I am currently taking during my gap year?
Thank you!
Ah that’s positive that you can still reapply! Thank you! Good luck!I got to VI. They did say in their email that they would welcome an app from me after the six month period, but they might say that to everyone.
Best of luck in getting past AC! I hope it works out for you
Thank you so much!I think it is a good idea to list more experiences under one heading when there is a natural way you can organize them under a label. What you mentioned are good examples of that, so you can definitely put down broader headings such as 'university society roles' or 'volunteering roles' or 'law firm events'. A bad example would be something like 'Internships' when you have done internships in very different roles and in different industries. This is because there would not be enough commonality between the experiences to justify bundling them together and this might be interpreted by recruiters as just an attempt to sidestep their listing limit.
As for your second question about the Forage experience, I think given the space constraints, if you cannot find a way to bundle it with other work experiences it may indeed be preferrable to prioritize more substantive jobs. However, I would still try to mention it, even if very briefly, in one of your answer to application form questions or in the cover letter.
Hi @KBanana and just to offer a quick response before @Ram Sabaratnam and @Jessica Booker come back to you: I think the answer is yes, provided that the course requires significant commitment of your time and efforts. If it takes less than 4-5 hours of study per week for you, I think that will mentioning it will likely not do you much harm, it won't add a lot of value either. If you dedicate around 10 hours or more, I would definitely mention it. On that point, I would also advise you to explicitly quantify your efforts both in terms of time commitments and regarding the level of proficiency you expect to attain.@Ram Sabaratnam @Jessica Booker
On the Vantage application portal, it states "Please add any supplementary educational information including extra study and international qualifications". Would it be appropriate to mention a language course I am currently taking during my gap year?
Thank you!
I understand; thank you for the detailed answer!Hi @andreilover01
I’m sure you'd just LOOOOOVE some insight from @Andrei Radu (and I would too tbh), but I just wanted to chime in to say YES, you can absolutely talk about debate and the steps you’ve taken to improve your skills. It’s a great example that can be taken in a lot of interesting directions. That said, the question isn't mainly asking you to focus primarily on how you've developed your competency in the activity, but trying to explore what you find interesting or appealing about this activity. You can definitely mention your ability to use/develop certain skills when carrying out this specific extracurricular activity and describe how you've gone about doing so. Just make sure not to lose focus of what the question is mainly asking you to do, which is to describe why you find the activity interesting/inspiring. Is it the intellectual challenge, the challenge of presenting a strong argument and persuading others, or the collaboration with teammates to find the best arguments for your position? If it's one or another of these, bring that reason right up top when discussing the activity. Showing what interests you will help bring your response to life and give the reader a real sense of your personality.
If the word count allows, it might also be worth mentioning another interest or two which showcases a broader range of activities and what you enjoy about them. For instance, if you’re into art, a particular sport, or anything else really, how do these hobbies inspire or challenge you in unique ways? By discussing multiple activities, you can demonstrate different facets of your character and the skills or qualities they’ve helped you develop. Ultimately, as Andrei mentioned, the question is about giving the reader a glimpse of your personality: what excites and motivates you outside of education and work. So while debate is one great activity to mention, try to give the reader a multifaceted window into your personality. Good luck with your application!
View attachment 6454
Hi, do you have any tips on how to prepare for the VI section please? The situation based questions sound difficult!
I just to the VI invite, roughly 1 week and two days after I passed the WG.How long after were you informed! and what vacation scheme did you apply for I am doing summer!!
Congratulations, when did you hear back?@Andrei Radu @Jessica Booker @Jessica Booker - I would like to say a massive thank you for all of your help, I appreciate all of your support - I secured a position on the summer internship with DLA, I am extremely appreciative of your guidance.
Congratulations, when did you hear back?
Yes it was I think some other people received rejections today so if you haven’t heard back yet, it should hopefully be a good sign 🍀sorry to hear this! was this for WVS? I've still heard nothing...
It isn't really that daunting in my experience and can be quite enjoyable if you frame it as speaking to an expert in their field.General question for anyone who has been to an interview/AC:
Did you feel being interviewed by a lawyer quite daunting? The idea of me (a rookie!) talking at length with a partner is pretty intimidating to me. Especially when the whole exercise is to see whether I’m what they’re looking for. (i.e. am I good enough or not?)
I’d love to hear how people frame the dynamic in their minds.
Thank you in advance ☺️