I guess the longer statement does not bring a definitive, cause-and-effect link between yawning and being tired and bored, while the shorter statement does. While we can assume that being tired and bored is an inducer of yawning, and hence assume the shorter statement is false, but it could also be due to something else which occurs when we are tired and bored, so it could be a correlation/causation moment.does anyone mind explaining this to me? I always struggle between choosing true/false as opposed to probably true or probably false
I also guess the ambiguity in the longer paragraph, particularly concerning the word 'assume', does not correlate to us being able to definitively conclude the statement is 'false'.
This is just my interpretation though! Also sorry if it doesn't make sense, I find communicating arguments like this quite difficult.