I applied for the Spring VS on 12/10, didn’t make it past the initial paper sift - it was worth a punt I guess 😂Aaaa im sorry, if you don’t mind me asking which scheme was your application for? also what stage of the process was it?
I applied for the Spring VS on 12/10, didn’t make it past the initial paper sift - it was worth a punt I guess 😂Aaaa im sorry, if you don’t mind me asking which scheme was your application for? also what stage of the process was it?
Thanks - that makes sense!Just to add to @Jessica Booker's response, I think mentioning Chambers/Legal 500 rankings can be very useful for your reasoning around the firm's unique selling points in terms of practice areas strength and sector expertise. It is a way of evidencing your claims and placing the firm in the context if the market competition. However, as Jessica mentioned, it is essential to connect the point your are evidencing with the ranking with your motivations, interests and experiences - ie. why are you interested in working at a firm that has excellent renown for X practice area/sectors, and which of your work/other experiences reinforce this point?
Today, I received my assessment results. I scored high in analysis, relationship building, and credibility, but low in adaptability.I have advice. Use a calculator!
I think you can rely less on the "why law" aspect and focus more on the "why the firm" and then touch briefly upon what you hope to gain from the scheme.When asked 'What led you to apply for firm's vacation scheme?', is that a combination of why law and why the firm? Do you also need to discuss what you hope to gain out of the vacation scheme? Would be hard to condense all three in a 2-3m response. Thanks in advance!
It being an apprenticeship is not an issue - you have got a training contract, you are just combining your SQE studies with work. This is not a "weaker" format of training - it is identical to a training contract, you just study concurrently rather then prior to your QWE.@Jessica Booker
I have been offered a ~2.5 years apprenticeship programme where they fully sponsor my SQE 1&2, sponsor my studies under that SQE programe, and give me a rly good full time salary and QWE. (i've graduated with a 1st in law from a non-russell group uni)
I am somewhat relieved as the TC application process is exhausting and uncertain and feels hopeless at times. However, I also fear I will not receive the dynamic exposure to various sectors etc that city firms offer. I would love to hear your your opinions on this? If e.g., I specialise in conveyancing, will it be difficult to move to different sectors once I become NQ? Or should I just aim to pass my exams and continue as a paralegal until I receive a training contract at a city firm? I do not believe there are any strict requirements for me to complete the programme etc meaning I can exit at any time but it is not the sector I think I see myself working in (which I have made the firm aware of). Would it be better for me to continue as a paralegal or accept this programme (them sponsoring my SQE makes me want to say yes) but I just want to know if doing this apprenticeship will make me a 'weaker' candidate in a way as it is not a traditional TC format.
thank you so much in advance.
There are lots of very different factors that can influence this, so it can all be very random.What decides when people hear back from an AC? I had people in my AC that heard back the very evening with a successful offer, some heard back a couple days after with a rejection and for me it’s now been one week with no updates. Was just wondering if there is a process firms go through or if it’s all random?
This can be a side effect of running open days for very specific groups.Is it just me or are Davis Polk absolutely not interested in hiring graduates (VS/TC)? Zero mention of "graduate" on their website or recruitment brochure, and having had a quick look on LinkedIn it seems all future trainees/trainees were offered TCs whilst being students.
I am a graduate, but despite all these red flags I feel tempted to apply (as I'm really interested in corp fin and the style of the firm). Please can someone with insight or knowledge of the matter advise. Is it worth applying in my situation/as a graduate?
Looping in @Jessica Booker @Andrei Radu
Thanks @Jessica BookerThis can be a side effect of running open days for very specific groups.
Their open days only seem to be for first years or penultimate year undergraduates/penultimate year postgraduates - this is likely to then influence their vacation schemes cohorts, who are more likely to be made up of their open day attendees, and then if they only recruit around 5 trainees a year from 24 vacation scheme students, it's a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I don't know enough about the firm to comment whether this is the reality though!
Last year at the Legal Cheek law fair, I asked if I could apply during my final year, and they said I could, as long as I clearly explained my plans for the gap year in my cover letter. So I assume as a graduate, if you can show what you’re doing in the meantime, you can apply.
Hi, May i ask if final year law student can apply for its' vacation scheme? It doesnt specified on the website though@Andrei Radu and @Ram Sabaratnam,
I trust you are well.
I am currently applying to Reed Smith and I am struggling with one specific question 'Focusing on one of Reed Smith`s sectors, what current issues do you think will impact this sector? What opportunities or challenges could this present Reed Smith or our clients?'
I have identified the industry and two issues, however, I feel that they present many opportunities to Reed Smith and their clients. Do I need to identify a challenge too?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Hi! Thanks so much for the advice. I did end up going with a separation, purely because the word count isn't high and I didn't really want to take away from actual content, but I'm glad I have confirmation that this was an okay choice so thank you!Howdy @AlegalA
I'm pretty much in agreement with what @Jessica Booker said. If you really want to, there's no harm in trying to ensure there's some flow or continuity between the separate paragraphs. You could, for instance, add small, connecting sentences between the sections. For example, in the ‘Be Better Together’ section, you can mention how DWF's collaborative culture is something you'd be well-suited to and then discuss your particular example for that section. These short transitional sentences can give your statement a cohesive feel, but again it's not entirely necessary.
Best of luck!
I spoke to Grad Rec at the Legal Cheek Law Fair, who confirmed that grads can apply for the Insight Days (closing on 12th November). I’ve drafted my application for them, you have nothing to lose by applying.Is it just me or are Davis Polk absolutely not interested in hiring graduates (VS/TC)? Zero mention of "graduate" on their website or recruitment brochure, and having had a quick look on LinkedIn it seems all future trainees/trainees were offered TCs whilst being students.
I am a graduate, but despite all these red flags I feel tempted to apply (as I'm really interested in corp fin and the style of the firm). Please can someone with insight or knowledge of the matter advise. Is it worth applying in my situation/as a graduate?
Looping in @Jessica Booker @Andrei Radu