I assume from the question, perhaps wrongly, that LLL is doing a virtual AC for logistical reasons, while rival candidates are doing it in person. I might be wrong though?
How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register HereThank you so much.I think to stand out in paralegal applications you will have to focus on many of the same aspects you would in a VS/TC application. In reviewing your work, I would advise you to do the following:
Besides this, I think you should also ensure you show your understanding of the differences between the role of a paralegal and a trainee; and to explain why your motivations/skills at this stage make you a good fit for the former.
- Is your why the firm reasoning persuasive? Do you identify the firm's unique selling points and market position and explain why you prefer it to its rivals?
- Do you have a good why commercial law answer? Does your reasoning explain why you prefer law to any other career, and why you prefer working for business other than any other type of client?
- Do you sell yourself as a candidate by identifying your most relevant skills and achievements and explaining their importance for the job?
- Is your writing structured, clear, concise, and easy to follow?
- Do you link all your motivations and claims about skills with examples of experiences and achievement? Did you properly explain those experiences using a STAR structure?
Massive congratulations on this btw! Which intake did you apply for if I may ask?Hi guys, i have an AC next week with King & Spalding and was wondering if anyone had any advice? anyone previously been at their AC?
thanks! I applied for the September 2027 intake if I am not mistakenMassive congratulations on this btw! Which intake did you apply for if I may ask?
Everyone is the sameI don't even wanna talk about how the VI went... I didn't think I would be nervous but when it came down to it??? Shaky, quiet voice was really in full force lol 😭
The general rule is that applications will be open until 23:59 on the day of the specified deadline. A minority of firms will close applications at 12:00 (at noon) instead, but in my experience this always comes with an express notice. Since for Farrer nothing of the sort is mentioned in the FAQ or the applications page, and since as of this time it seems the applications portal is still open, I think it is very likely the general rule will hold true.Hi all! Is anyone able to confirm if Farrer's deadline is tonight (11:59 p.m.)? The website says today, but I'm unsure whether it's anytime earlier than just before midnight. Thanks!
As it’s a Sunday, it’s unlikely to be anything but 23.59 tonight as there would be little logic is closing at any other time when there isn’t any working hours today.Hi all! Is anyone able to confirm if Farrer's deadline is tonight (11:59 p.m.)? The website says today, but I'm unsure whether it's anytime earlier than just before midnight. Thanks!
I would speak to the firm about this - unfortunately our community won't know the answer to this, only the firm will.Hi guys! Not sure that this is the right place to post, but I thought people may have some experience/insight into this.
I have an upcoming summer VS, and I was wondering if you knew when I would start my TC if I am successful in the VS? I'm guessing I would start in 2027 (Start/mid intake??), and I understand this is dependant on the firm's intake availability. If correct, what do people do for that year's gap between starting the SQE?? Should I try and get a headstart with the content/structure also?
Paralegaling/working is ideal for me, but has anyone had any experiences on what to do?!
Thanks in advance, a slightly confused final year!!![]()
Hi guys! Not sure that this is the right place to post, but I thought people may have some experience/insight into this.
I have an upcoming summer VS, and I was wondering if you knew when I would start my TC if I am successful in the VS? I'm guessing I would start in 2027 (Start/mid intake??), and I understand this is dependant on the firm's intake availability. If correct, what do people do for that year's gap between starting the SQE?? Should I try and get a headstart with the content/structure also?
Paralegaling/working is ideal for me, but has anyone had any experiences on what to do?!
Thanks in advance, a slightly confused final year!!![]()
Hi guys! Not sure that this is the right place to post, but I thought people may have some experience/insight into this.
I have an upcoming summer VS, and I was wondering if you knew when I would start my TC if I am successful in the VS? I'm guessing I would start in 2027 (Start/mid intake??), and I understand this is dependant on the firm's intake availability. If correct, what do people do for that year's gap between starting the SQE?? Should I try and get a headstart with the content/structure also?
Paralegaling/working is ideal for me, but has anyone had any experiences on what to do?!
Thanks in advance, a slightly confused final year!!![]()
Does anyone here know how VS candidates can assess a firm to determine if it’s the right firm for them, during a VS? I know associates and partners will assess us but what kinds of things can and should VS’ers look for in a firm? I have a Spring VS fairly soon so starting to think about this in the event I am somehow able to convert it into a TC offer! Please help. 😅🥲
@Amma Usman @Andrei Radu @Ram Sabaratnam
Does anyone have any advice for preparing for the Macfarlanes dinner phone interview. The email said it would be discussing motivations for the dinner and research on the firm but 15 mins for that just for a dinner seems quite excessive so I don't know if I should prep other things?
Thanks![]()
As @Jessica Booker said, while a VS is an amazing opportunity to gain insight into what your life at the firm could look like, there is only so much you can experience in a few weeks. It will be very difficult to assess some important elements, such as the level to which you enjoy the work and the high-pressure tight-deadlines environment. As a vacation schemer you can only be trusted with so much, and in most cases no one in the firm will be really relying on your work product or will generally treat you like a real trainee. In truth, when deciding if a firm is right for you/deciding between different firms you are doing a VS with, I think there are two aspects to consider:
- Differences on paper: how good a firm is in the practices that interest you, their financial position, their strategy, their approach to training etc. These are all points you will have already been aware of and considered at the application stage, so in theory they should be a good fit. While discussing them with practitioners during the scheme might give you further insight, particularly in regards to how the firm compares to its competitors, this is not something is likely to dramatically change your view about how good of a fit it is "on paper".
- Intangible differences: this is I think the true benefit of a VS - to give you a chance to see whether you feel you are a fit for the place "in practice". This will simply come down to how you feel day to day at the firm. You will have heard endless talk of "firm culture" and seen so many firms describe theirs in almost identical manners and might be tempted to think "cultural fit" should in many cases just be a non-factor. However, from my experience it is true that there are relevant differences between social dynamics at different firms. In some places people tend to be social and outgoing; in others more reserved and focused on work. In some firms partners tend to be very serious, while in others they will take themselves way less seriously and be a lot more willing to joke around with associates and trainees. In some places you will see a higher degree of competitiveness and individualism, while in others people focus on the team more; in some firms, associates will seem to be quite passionate about their work, whereas in others they will be more cynical; in some, people will be more relaxed, in others they will tend to be hyper-ambitious. However, it is difficult to make reliable generalizations. Sometimes, the dynamics can differ more on a department by department basis rather than a firm by firm bases; and in many cases your assessment will also be greatly influenced by your luck regarding the particular people you will get to interact more with. In my opinion, the best you can do is to try to engage with as many people as you can and get a feel for the firm as a whole, and then simply see how comfortable you feel in that space. Fundamentally, and as it happened in my case, I think the question of fit tends to come down to a gut feeling more than anything else.
Hiya @Chris Brown
Just wanted to add to the excellent comments by @Andrei Radu. Loved his point that the vac scheme is particularly useful in helping you feel out the more intangible aspects of a firm. In my case, there were a few key things I paid attention to during my schemes.
One was how receptive people were to me asking for work. I try to be proactive and enjoy chatting with people to see where I can get involved. At some firms, that wasn’t always easy. People were polite but not especially keen to loop me/vac schemers into live matters. At others, I found that even busy associates would find time to get me stuck into something, which I really appreciated. This really highlighted how collaborative people seemed. The more open and team-oriented the culture felt, the more excited I was to picture myself working there.
I also looked at how people gave feedback. When they offered feedback, did it feel like a genuine learning opportunity, or more like a box-ticking exercise for them? Since I knew I was leaning towards firms with strong learning-on-the-job cultures, it mattered to me that people took time to explain what I’d done well or where I could improve. This was particularly important to me, since US firms don't always have such structured learning. Feedback on my work was my way of seeing whether I could effectively teach myself how to complete tasks to a high standard.
And lastly, I’d echo what Andrei said about friendliness/sociability and how this can vary from firms. I still remember getting lost on my first day at one firm and a partner offering me a tour and inviting me to get involved with a PE matter (this interaction really stuck with me). It was important to me that people could be seen chatting near the coffee area, or that I'd see senior associates/partners at social events.
Overall, I'd recommend having a think about what factors really matter to you. You're going to do amazing!