TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

Chris Brown

Legendary Member
Jul 4, 2024
253
410
quite stressed because im still waiting on so many firms after sending my application :( is this common? i havent heard back at all from sidley/davis polk/milbank and weil after vi. it’s just disheartening waiting so long that i’m considering if i’ll have to reapply in my third year. doesn’t help that i’m an intl student w parents back home who keep asking for updates
From what I have seen on this forum, Weil has not given updates to most people following VI. They are genuinely taking a Weil to get back to people. 😂

As for other firms, I think I have seen a handful of AC’s for Milbank and DPW. Don’t count yourself out just yet!

There is still time for AC’s and VS offers, especially if it’s for Summer!

Best of luck in your applications this cycle! 🙂
 
Last edited:
  • 🤝
Reactions: badmintonflyinginsect

tom-sawyer

New Member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Jun 22, 2020
3
1
One feedback I often got from exercises like this is that I did not discuss the commercial side enough, and I focused mainly on the legal stuff. Clients will want to know more about what affects their business, and while including legal risks is good and demonstrates sound knowledge, it is always advised to personalise it to the client and their business/wider industry. Still discuss legal risks where necessary and where you are told to do so, but ensure you link this back to the client.

Think of it this way. In the phrase commercial law, commerce comes before law.

Other tips:


- Avoid technical knowledge or jargon.
- Write succinctly and clearly.
- Do not break down obvious things a client will know about their own sector. Also helps save word count.
- Structure… have you addressed everyone accurately? Signed off and started with the right formalities? Have you used headings?
Brilliant - thank you Amma!!
 

Chris Brown

Legendary Member
Jul 4, 2024
253
410
please please please can someone link the post made by either @Andrei Radu , @Ram Sabaratnam or @Amma Usman on how to approach certain sjt questions — it was very helpful and gave examples of certain scenarios, but now I cannot find it for the life of me
Hiya @ilovegardening1111

Situational judgement tests (SJTs) can definitely feel a bit tricky at first. I remember finding them quite challenging when I was applying. It took me a little while to figure out how to approach them effectively, but there were a couple of things that really helped me, and I hope they’ll help you too.

One thing I’d recommend is going onto the firm’s website and making a note of the values, behaviours, and qualities they emphasise in their recruitment materials. Keep these in front of you when you’re doing the test, as they’ll give you a strong sense of what the firm is looking for in a candidate. You'll want to have a think about how to connect those values to the answers you choose. For example, if a firm like Latham (just as an example) highlights an entrepreneurial spirit, then answers that focus on independent thinking and creative problem-solving might rank higher. On the other hand, responses that suggest relying heavily on others for direction might rank lower. Thinking in this way really helped me make sense of what firms were looking for, especially when I was feeling confused.

I also found this video by Idin Sabahipour incredibly useful. I hope these tips help, and good luck with everything you’re working on!

Good luck with the SJTs!
Honestly, there’s no exact formula for smashing SJTs, and I think it’s so important to remember that! A lot of people fall into the trap of trying to pick the answers they think the firm wants to hear, but, in reality, it’s more about how you instinctively respond to business scenarios and your approach to problem-solving. Trust your intuition, it’s more reliable than you think because you already have a general sense of what’s right in a workplace context.

I know people often say to keep the firm’s values in mind while doing SJTs, which is good. However, sometimes it can backfire. If you spend too much time overthinking how to align your answers to their values, you risk running out of time. Most firms value things like proactivity, intellectual curiosity, commercial awareness, and teamwork - you don’t need to stress trying to memorise or focus solely on those. Trust that your instincts already factor these in because they’re a given in professional settings.

One trend I’ve noticed in SJTs is the “demanding deadlines” scenario, like when you’re already swamped, and someone asks you to take on another task. It’s tempting to say “yes” to show you’re proactive, but in reality, a professional workplace values honesty and prioritisation. It’s often better to acknowledge your capacity and explain why you can’t take on extra work without risking the quality of your other tasks. Being upfront shows self-awareness and professionalism.

At the end of the day, SJTs test how you’d navigate realistic situations, so trust your gut.

Best wishes and I know you’ll do amazing!
I don’t know what the specific post is that you are trying to find, but I did find these posts which I think could be potentially useful! 🙂🙂

SJT’s are actually so difficult because there is never a single right answer! 🥲🥲
 
Last edited:
  • 🏆
  • Like
Reactions: SonghaivAngel and Bread

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.