just got this from Latham's after not hearing if I have progressed for an AC "Due to the volume of applications we received we are still working through reviewing these. We are therefore hoping to provide you with a further update on the status of your application within the end of February."
-
Build your commercial awareness from scratch in 1 month! Use the coupon code 'FORUM' at checkout for £30 off.
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
- Thread starter Jessica Booker
- Start date
-
- Tags
- vacation scheme
All adjustments that someone requires are clearly stated in a support plan or needs based report. The OP should just refer to what is in there and let grad rec know.
However, from the tone of the post, It seems like they were trying to get extra adjustments which they were not entitled to
It's not easy to know what adjustments you need, especially as you get older. There are adjustments I had for GCses and A levels that I don't need now.
I've seen people have laptops/ipads as a replacement for paper on tasks; others get the questions on a written piece of paper in the interview so they can read them as well as getting them verably.
I don't understand why we need to be mean to each other.
You won't get them in advance, I'm sure, as that wouldn't be fair, but I suggest asking for them written once you enter the interview.
I did their test 4.12.24, so was nervous the email was a PFO as ik some people got holding emails or progressed to AC
I don’t know why you are getting so defensive. The question you asked isn’t something that anyone on here can even answer.
Like I said, from the tone of your original post, it just sounded like you were being a bit deceitful.
I would recommend asking your support worker whether this is something you think will help you. As this will depend more on your personal circumstances. Just because someone else was “successful in getting the questions in advance” doesn’t necessarily mean you will.
I did the test in early September, think they are just going through the applications still
I don’t think it’s right to assume based on tone of a post whether someone is trying to seek extra adjustments that they may or may not be entitled to.
If grad rec reached out to them, surely it must have been included in their original application. I don’t think there was a need to assume they were self diagnosing neurodivergence either.
There were adjustments I had in school that do not bare relevance anymore. Similarly, having gone through this application cycle, I have requested adjustments I didn’t need before, such as around interview formats.
Ultimately each person is different and has their own needs around reasonable adjustments. It’s not our place to assume that someone is being deceitful.
Last edited:
I don’t think you could get questions in advance solely because often they aren’t all prepared in advance - sometimes partners will ask follow up questions based on the answers you give them.
However, I think you can get the questions in a written format that you can read during interviews.
You can normally request private rooms for preparation e.g., when there is a case study involved.
I think you get given breaks in between each of the AC components and extra time for each.
I also think it’s common to do tasks on an iPad or laptop as opposed to paper.
Last edited:
This is how you respond after being challenged? Not a great look.
Noooo I applied 27th Dec and was so hopeful for MoFo 🥲 congratulations though!
He literally asked “does anyone know what I can get”.
“Has anyone been successful in getting the questions in advance”
I’m sorry, but how is anyone reading that not going to have alarm bells ringing?
It sounds exactly like they’re trying to game the system. If they really wanted to know what adjustments they were entitled to, they would not come on here trying to see what other adjustments people have got.
That’s like saying you’re allergic to nuts and can’t eat nuts and require dietary restrictions because some random user like “bigboy101” on TCLA is allergic to nuts. Please explain this logic to me?
Guys, this is not what this forum is for!!! What is the point in disputing about a possible misunderstanding- when all someone asked for is some advice, because MAYBE they wanted to be sure of something before asking Grad recruitment- there is NOTHING wrong with this, and we should encourage everyone to ask questions!!!
I was under the impression they were seeking clarity over reasonable adjustments. Perhaps they wanted to be sure of what can be deemed reasonable adjustments by asking people on the forum about their experience.
There is NOTHING wrong with seeking guidance about reasonable adjustments.
I don’t want this to turn into a dispute. This may just be a simple misunderstanding. 🙂
I think the difference between the example you mentioned and the reality of being neurodivergent/dealing with a health condition is that there can be a whole bunch of different reasonable adjustments based on the circumstances. For example, at university, I ended up getting different reasonable adjustments in comparison to what I was given for the SQE. Though there might be reasonable adjustments in common, these may change based on the nature of the tasks you're doing.
Let's just be nice to each other - this process is difficult enough as it is.
ANYWAY…
Has anyone heard anything else from HL after their flurry of emails the other day?
Has anyone heard anything else from HL after their flurry of emails the other day?
I don’t want to turn this into a dispute either. But I don’t want people to be disingenuous and lack integrity either. Especially if they are applying to a profession where they will be bound by a code of conduct…
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Locked
- Sticky
- Sticky
