Hi, I am just wondering what the general approach in competency interviews is regarding whether you should use examples on your application form, examples from the work experience section or answers to application questions?
Hello
@Tom smith . For answers on the application form itself (application answers), definitely go ahead and touch on these in interviews. However, I want to stress the importance of not completely regurgitating the points, especially to the questions on ‘why commercial law’ and ’why X firm’. The reason is because your passion to pursue a career at the firm should not be solely contained in 200-300 words and the interview would be a chance to talk a lot more about this. You will often find in most interviews, questions coming up requiring you to expand on the application form (provided your interviewers have access to this form). Thus, well prepared research needs to be carried out to significantly demonstrate why a firm appeals to you
over others. As you can imagine, multiple firms will have the same practice areas and similar clients, but finding a niche interest the firm is great in will help distinguish you from other candidates and convey your passions clearly in interviews.
The same approach applies to the work experience section as well. The tasks a candidate inclues in that section are non-exhaustive and do not cover the full entirety of work completed during the placement. The way I see it, the answers on your application form demonstrate your
motivations, whereas your work experience demonstrates your
competencies - your skills. So, it‘s worth including examples beyond what’s already seen in that section. I believe the work section ties together answers for situational, competency, and motivational questions through specific examples. You could certainly use the same examples for each when asked in an interview, but using different examples each time will help showcase a diversified portfolio and skillset.
Overall, use all the three sections you highlighted in your question and place a specific emphasis on
expansion.