How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register HereThis simply is not true. You are not restricted to paralegal roles.
Once you qualify as a solicitor, you will immediately become ineglible for TC and VS. Then your job options will be restricted to paralegal roles.
As an international student, the firms automatically consider you probably have little to zero knowledge of English law (undergrad level). Further, the odds are lower if you have no significant PQE practising law overseas (particularly in civil law countries).
The firms' job advertisements say they look for someone "trained in the UK". Unfortunately, except if you are a paralegal at an elite firm offering NQ roles for trainees, you would be at a disadvantage when competing against trainees from other firms in any lateral recruitment for the reasons mentioned by Jessica.
For example, my LLM colleagues struggled to find associate jobs after passing the SQE. They have been working as paralegals or locum solicitors for the past 2 years.
I know just two graduates qualified as solicitors via SQE with +10 PQE who received offers to work as associates (corporate at a US elite firm and financial services at a global firm).
Check this post where someone shared the hurdle after qualifying via SQE without a TC: https://www.thecorporatelawacademy....lkie-farr-gallagher-anything.4439/post-190218
They’ve done at least some PFOs so hopefully good news for you 🤞🏻has anyone heard from Mayer Brown post-job simulation?
Oh, I thought you were applying directly for their training contract.I‘m applying for their placement and I thought it was automatic invite… I’m acc confused 😭
People with experience with Latham's process might tell you more, but I do not think you necessarily should. While I would say the average response time post AC is perhaps under 2 weeks, a longer wait time could be due to many factors. In my case, I waited for more than 4 weeks for a response from Slaughter and May and still received an offer. The reason was not that I had been waitlisted or that another candidate had dropped or anything of that sort, but simply that they were interviewing people over an extended period of time. As such, in absence of more information I see no reason to assume a rejection in your case.Haven't heard from Latham post AC for 2 weeks... should I assume a rejection?
For the first question, while I do not have a lot of prior knowledge about the firm, I do believe Chambers and Legal 500 rankings are good indicators for a firm's practice area focus and strengths. Based on that, it seems like Winston & Strawn is not simply a litigation boutique, but that it covers a wider array of practices to service a wider client base. Looking at its Legal 500 rankings (as Chambers only ranks its finance department), we see the firm is recognized for:Does anyone know Winston & Strawn is known for / what the firm specialises in (London office specifically)? I read something on here that said it's quite a niche / specialised firm and it seems they may be most known for litigation but my research suggests they are also pretty strong in more transactional / advisory areas like finance, M&A, I&R etc?
Also, one of the questions on their application for is 'what motivates you?' Seems quite simple but also quite wide so any tips on how to approach this question would be much appreciated!![]()
They are inviting 60 people for ACs. They have only hosted I believe 3-4 ACs so far of around 4 people. It's not over till it's over!They’ve done at least some PFOs so hopefully good news for you 🤞🏻
Thank you! In the same boat. If anyone could share whether or not they have heard back / what their experience has been, would be much appreciated!People with experience with Latham's process might tell you more, but I do not think you necessarily should. While I would say the average response time post AC is perhaps under 2 weeks, a longer wait time could be due to many factors. In my case, I waited for more than 4 weeks for a response from Slaughter and May and still received an offer. The reason was not that I had been waitlisted or that another candidate had dropped or anything of that sort, but simply that they were interviewing people over an extended period of time. As such, in absence of more information I see no reason to assume a rejection in your case.
Hi, when did you apply and when did you receive your invite please?Looking for insights for W&C VI. I can help with Macfarlanes, Slaughters, JD, Eversheds.
I’m also still waiting for a W&C response lmao.🤣💀Hi, when did you apply and when did you receive your invite please?
3 weeks? I applied on December 12th!I’m also still waiting for a W&C response lmao.🤣💀
It’s been 3 weeks since I applied and I still haven’t heard anything back at all. 😬🫣
I applied on 23 Sep and have heard nothing lol. Defo a PFO but they shouldn't make me wait 4 months lol. Do you think I should email?I’m also still waiting for a W&C response lmao.🤣💀
It’s been 3 weeks since I applied and I still haven’t heard anything back at all. 😬🫣
Idk whether to assume PFO atp. 🥲🥲
I have seen people on the forum that applied for WVS and were instead considered for SVS and got invited to VI/AC recently. 🙂I applied on 23 Sep and have heard nothing lol. Defo a PFO but they shouldn't make me wait 4 months lol. Do you think I should email?