This is so helpful - thanks RamHiya @KSV
So great you're applying to Covington - they're a great firm 🥳
While it wouldn't necessarily be wrong to include a section on why you want to pursue commercial law, I’d recommend focusing directly on the question: why Covington, and how you see yourself contributing to the firm’s success. You can still show your commercial awareness by discussing Covington’s specific work and the commercial or legal impact it has in areas you’re interested in.
By addressing the question head-on, you’ll be able to make better use of the word count to highlight your knowledge of the firm. For example, you could mention particular cases, deals, or practice areas that resonate with you and explain why you find them interesting or significant. This will also give you the chance to do what the question is asking you to do - show how your skills, experiences, and interests align with the firm’s work and culture.
Rather than try to give an answer to why commercial law in this question, you can incorporate your understanding of Covington's clients, sectoral expertise, and market position to demonstrate your commerciality. It’s about weaving that insight into your reasons for wanting to join Covington specifically.
Hope this helps, and best of luck with your application!
Yes, 30 minsDoes anyone know if Cleary's WG is timed?
Fingers crossed for you! When did you apply and when did they get back to you regarding you moving onto the interview stage? I haven't heard anything from them and applied first half of September :/Anyone else waiting to hear back from Sidley post interview?
I did the Bird & Bird WG last Friday. Hopefully I’ll hear something back soon!Anything from Hogan Lovells for the Lift Off programme/ Bird & Bird spring vac scheme? 🤔
When did you apply to Bird & Bird if you don't mind me asking? thanks!I did the Bird & Bird WG last Friday. Hopefully I’ll hear something back soon!
I applied on 26/09, received WG on 10/10When did you apply to Bird & Bird if you don't mind me asking? thanks!
That varies so much by firm. I've had 18% (I didn't convert). I've had 50% before (converted it). You can often work that out. Find out how many ACs on. Find out how many at each. Then compare to VS spaces etc.Does anyone know, roughly, what the % conversion rate is for ACs -> VCs? Is it generally above or below 50%?
Sorry to hear.Rejected from Willkie Farr's open day. I guess that makes sense, honestly. I got their written exercise once. Focusing on different firms makes sense. Mostly successful with white shoe firms. However, that's a small group obviously.
A group of prestigious New York firms including the likes of Sullivan Cromwell, Simpson Thacher, Cravath, Davis Polk and Paul, Weiss. While there is no exact list of group 'members', the term has mostly been used to refer to the firms who were recruiting heavily from Ivy league universities, where wearing white shoes was fashionable around the middle of the 20th century. These are also the firms that have been traditionally seen as the pinnacle of the US legal market and some argue that the 'white shoe' label is broadly analogous with the 'Magic Circle'. However, much like in the UK, the traditional hierarchy is also shifting in the US, as evidenced by the rise of the non-NY Latham and Kirkland.Sorry to hear.
What is white shoe firms?