Highest in both verbal and numericalbut what about their verbal and numerical scores?
Mine were:
Verbal: Highest
Numerical: highest
4377
PFO
How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register HereHighest in both verbal and numericalbut what about their verbal and numerical scores?
Mine were:
Verbal: Highest
Numerical: highest
4377
PFO
Hi Ram! I was wondering how you would structure the SWOT analysis. Would you recommend using short bullet points, a paragraph for each Swot portion, or a mixture of both (i.e. bullet point + 1-2 sentences)?
Thanks in advance!
Highest in both verbal and numerical
I can ask but from what I remember discussing the application with them I don’t think so?That's crazy. 9877 is essentially perfect.
Were there any diversity related questions on the application form? I don't remember.
I can ask but from what I remember discussing the application with them I don’t think so?
Definitely, some greater clarity and transparency about the selection process would be highly appreciated.they say yes but I don't honestly remember
The first stage of our process is a short application form. You’ll be asked to share details of your undergraduate degree and any further vocational education, your life history, and information as part of the Rare Contextualised Recruitment System, which allows us to understand the context in which your experiences have been gained and enables us to identify top candidates from the widest pool possible.
It's weird, if you design a recruitment process in this way you either:
1. end up with irrelevant luck-based distinctions between candidates and/or
2. end up with a large number of candidates with the same score and then you must choose between them based on some undisclosed criteria that are not likely to link to job ability.
Yes it’s absolutely ridiculousmy friend got a PFO from WBD London today after getting 9877 on the assessment. Especially because there were no application questions, with a score as high as that I can’t think of one reason for the rejection? What would they even have based it on?
Yes it’s absolutely ridiculous
At the end of the day, partners have ownership in the firm and it is of material interest of them to engage in the recruiting process. Partners look for people they can see working alongside, and I've learned that their choice can be a lot more human-centred than grades / scores in an assesment. Being likeable / charismatic / enthusiastic will of course put you in much better stead. This is why it is important to find firms whose culture aligns with your character.The legal recruitment process is excruciatingly bad. I’ve also yet to secure an offer after 4 assessment centres with different firms the last 2 years.
There’s just too much bias involved in interviews that people are rejected because they weren’t ‘liked’. They shouldn’t allow partners or associates to conduct interviews anymore! It’s awful.
Quick WG Assumption Q:
For humankind to survive, it must colonise other planets.
Assumption - There will be a time when the Earth can no longer sustain human life.
Am I right in saying that an assumption has been made here?
The only thing I can think of against this is that Earth may very well sustain human life, but not be sufficient. Then again, that would mean that it technically cannot sustain human life, and therefore, the assumption is made.
Also, if I were to invert this: There will be a time when the Earth can sustain human life, then the proposed statement becomes redundant, which should logically indicate that there is an assumption, no?
3.30 am yk, I hate these damn tests.
May be a controversial take, but fundamentally law firms are partnerships where people work very closely together, so imo it makes sense for lawyers to be involved in the recruitment process and pick whom they find likeable, because at the end of the day they will be working long hours togetherThe legal recruitment process is excruciatingly bad. I’ve also yet to secure an offer after 4 assessment centres with different firms the last 2 years.
There’s just too much bias involved in interviews that people are rejected because they weren’t ‘liked’. They shouldn’t allow partners or associates to conduct interviews anymore! It’s awful.
8887 mid mid PFO for WBDFeeling super deflated after a WBD PFO had scores of 7677, high intellect & mid numerical.
Hey, I heard back yesterday to complete a MCQ test....not sure if this is automatic to everyone?Has anyone heard back from Aspiring Solicitor's Sky internship?
me too! stressing how to complete this in the short timeframe!I got an email just now inviting me to MCQ'S.
me too! stressing how to complete this in the short timeframe!