TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

[CG_101]

Hi, sorry to ask again, but does anyone have experience of slaughters contacting referees and what it could mean/what they ask ?

Hi, Is this for the TC?

 

[Jessica Booker]

Hi Jessica,

Unfortunately, I have already rescheduled the interview already, so I don't think I could do it again.

Sorry for the late reply. I was waiting for the early careers to get back to me, as they had mentioned to me, before reaching out for further advice. However, I have not yet received any email or further communication since the offer call on Friday. How long would I normally have to wait for email confirmation following a phone call offer?

Thanks in advance!

I would still look to reschedule the interview over missing a day of the VS - firms are used to candidates rescheduling and if you explain to the interview firm you are rescheduling as you have a vacation scheme, they are likely to move you again.

Unless your vacation scheme is during the Easter holidays, I would wait at least a week until asking for when the formal documents would be sent, so I wouldn't chase up until Monday.

 

[Jessica Booker]

@Jessica Booker

Are helix/cartilage piercings in ears considered inappropriate for ACs? Would it reflect badly on me?

For most firms probably not, but I would try to wear something very subtle/small if you are concerned - most people are unlikely to even spot it if you wear something not obvious.

 

[👩🎓]

Hi @Jessica Booker

Do you have any advice on how to approach this question: What do you think you might find the most challenging part of being a Solicitor?

Any help will be appreciated, thank you.

 

[Jessica Booker]

Hi @Jessica Booker

Do you have any advice on how to approach this question: What do you think you might find the most challenging part of being a Solicitor?

Any help will be appreciated, thank you.

I would consider what you think you will be aspects of the job that will be more difficult. I would try to avoid the very obvious like long hours, challenging work, and focus more on specific responsibilities or tasks that might not play to your strengths, but then try to build in how you will use the resources around you or your strengths to try and balance out this challenge.

 

[👩🎓]

I would consider what you think you will be aspects of the job that will be more difficult. I would try to avoid the very obvious like long hours, challenging work, and focus more on specific responsibilities or tasks that might not play to your strengths, but then try to build in how you will use the resources around you or your strengths to try and balance out this challenge.

Thank you so much!

 

[missTCLA]

Anyone have insights for Dentons video interview? Id appreciate anything!!

 

[Babablacksheep]

Anyone heard from CRS after being put on the reserve list? Grad rec said they give out a few spots every year

 

[User123654]

Anyone heard back from DWF post AC?

 

[rapunzel]

Anyone have insights for Dentons video interview? Id appreciate anything!!

I remember it was so fast, so really be prepared for short preparation and answering time. That threw me off a lot. The questions were very normal VI questions, like what are current challenges law firms are facing right now.

 

[legallycurly]

Hey! I know DAC Beachcroft is good for insurance, but do not know much about the firm's competitors. If anyone has insights into this that would be really helpful!

 

[A worried graduate]

Hey! I know DAC Beachcroft is good for insurance, but do not know much about the firm's competitors. If anyone has insights into this that would be really helpful!

Kennedys possibly as they are insurance-heavy too

 

[User5678]

Hey! I know DAC Beachcroft is good for insurance, but do not know much about the firm's competitors. If anyone has insights into this that would be really helpful!

Kennedys and BJ - competitors for risk management work and insurance

 

[broalabear]

I would say you are correct. The way I see this text is where the assumption must be strictly true for the statement to hold.

Therefore, for the statement "There will be a time when the Earth can no longer sustain human life." an assumption has been made that Earth would not be able to sustain human life in perpetuity, i.e., if it could, there would be no reason to colonise other planets. In other words, given that human life is definitely not going to support human life forever, it *must* colonise other planets to ensure survival.

Yes it has been made.

Logic:

1. Negate the assumption: "There will never be a time when Earth can no longer sustain human life."
2. Is the statement still valid? No, the statement is no longer valid - if the Earth will always be able to sustain human life, humankind can survive without colonising other planets.

I have quoted a past post @Ram Sabaratnam has made on the WG (deductions) to help. I’m sure he’ll have more insights on how to tackle this assumption-type question too.

These are all extremely helpful. Thank you very much.

 

[broalabear]

What does the answer say?

Couldn't find one, unfortunately. Just had the question.

What is 'humankind'?

The way things are going, doomed.

 

[Mike Wazaoski]

Has anyone done an AC at Mishcon De Reya?

 

[Amma Usman]

Hey @AGRACHEL , SJTs will rarely focus on commercial awareness, but will try to test more of your competencies/how you react to different situations. That said, commercial awareness should still be a skill one constantly develops over a sustained period of time.

Hey @marisachr , good question. This is a tough one, particularly because competencies differ between firms and it is rather difficult to know which is the ‘right‘ answer. The truth is, often times there is no right answer. I’ve gone to several presentations by the providers of these SJTs which all say to trust your gut and intuition. Avoid spending too long on a question as this could make you run the risk of switching from the right answer, to the wrong one.

Hi @LawAspirer , this is a question which leads to many mixed perceptions. For example, I’ve completed SJTs at firms where the feedback report felt as though I did badly, but I ended up passing. Similarly, I’ve gotten reports back that were so positive I thought it was straight to the next stage - but subsequently I got a PFO. The point I’m trying to make is to not worry too much about how you perceive your results. You may have scored well on a key competency the firm looks for!

Hey there @floral.tcla ,

Unfortunately, there is no correct answer to this. What is considered right or wrong differs per question. I’d say to just always trust your instinct. It’s great you’re bearing the firm’s values in mind whilst answering. I’ve usually kept these in mind when answering every question, and the approach has served me well. Above all, prior to clicking on an answer, ensure that it sits well with you - and what you will genuinely do in that situation. There is usually no perfect answer in an SJT. However, there are usually answers that are evidently wrong from the start. This is where you can start cancelling them out mentally to focus on weighing more likely accurate answers. With regards your other specific question, a mentor once told me that there is a certain level of mindfulness a trainee needs to possess to ensure that they make the most of the learning and development opportunity. However, this should not come at the expense of speaking up and conveying your views on a discussion. In fact, it is very much needed as you were hired for your opinion - hired to add value. So, I recommend keeping both approaches in mind whilst responding.

Best of luck, and I’m sure you'll do great!

I wouldn’t worry too much about the numbers, to be honest. Firms have different metrics for how they assess things like this - sometimes they’re equally weighted, sometimes some categories are more weighted than others. Another thing is that there never really is a wrong answer in an SJT, some answers will just be more correct than others. Please do not worry too much about this, as I know it’s easy to dwell on such. Put it out your head, grab a nice hot cocoa, and go on with your day - this approach personally helped me when I was worried about applications that I’ve already sent. Or just do anything that excites you, really!

Is there any way (alongside practice tests) that one can prepare for an Amberjack test? I've never done one of these before so don't really know how to adequately prepare. Any tips would be appreciated!

Hey. The amberjacks usually comprise of SJTs, so I’ve quoted some past posts to help.

 

[Amma Usman]

Anyone have insights for Dentons video interview? Id appreciate anything!!

Hi there,

I’m unsure about Dentons, as I have never done it before, but I’ve come up with a list of frequent VI questions I’ve seen around.

1. Tell us about yourself and why you are interested in a career in law.
2. Why do you want to work at our firm specifically?
3. Describe a time you demonstrated resilience or overcame a challenge.
4. Tell us about a time you worked in a team. What was your role and what was the outcome?
5. Give an example of when you had to analyse a large amount of information and make a decision.
6. Tell us about a commercial news story that has caught your attention recently and why it is significant.
7. Describe a time you had to manage multiple deadlines. How did you prioritize?
8. Tell us about a time you received constructive criticism. How did you respond?
9. Why should we choose you over other candidates?
10. What do you think makes a great commercial lawyer?

 

[Amma Usman]

Hi, does anyone know how long it takes slaughters to get back with a decision after they contact your referee?

It depends on the recruitment timeline and various factors. I've bumped your question here as well in case anyone has been in the same situation before and has any insights. That said, it could change year on year for multiple reasons, such as the volume of applications, internal processes, and the specific stage of recruitment.

 

[Amma Usman]

I have a spring vacation scheme coming up, does anyone have advice on what I should be preparing in advance?

It seems like its heavily assessed, with group projects, a written task and another partner interview, but not sure what I should be focusing on in prep work!

You could prepare for soft things like boosting your commercial awareness as a lot of it may be relevant in the group exercise. For the partner interview, you should revisit your motivations for the firm. This may likely be asked as well as any changes/confirmations which flew following the scheme. If you are also told the topic of the written task, it’s worth reading on the area too. Lastly, a lot of it will be on the job so I’d say there’s not much to do in terms of prep, unless the firm has communicated some prior advance preparation materials beforehand.

Best of luck!