TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

jta227

Legendary Member
Nov 10, 2024
145
280
Reed Smith Post AC pfo. I don't get it, I answered all the questions well except maybe 1. I addressed all the issues in the case study. Is it worth putting in a DSAR?
Commiserations - if you're not going to reapply there then yes I would say it's worth it. Maybe ask for feedback first though - and see if what they tell you is helpful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: James Wakefield

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
715
1,321
Hi Ram,

Apologies if this has been asked before, but would you recommend someone with no legal experience yet to apply for DTC?
Just jumping in before @Ram Sabaratnam can also come back to you, I would say the default expectation is that you would have some legal work experience when applying for a direct TC, but that comes with two important caveats:
  1. That experience can be a whole lot less substantial than you would think: I know multiple people who had no past vacation schemes or paralegal work experiences, whose CV was limited to one internship (bordering at the line of a shadowing experience) at a not very well-known firm from a foreign country, who still managed to get TC offers in the summer.
  2. Absence of such experience is not an insurmountable obstacle, at least with some firms: I have also heard of cases of people with no legal work experience beyond Forage Virtual Internships getting TCs in the summer at lesser-known UK firms, so I think it may be worth a shot even if you do not have any. However, I would first take a look on the firm's website to see that they have not stated they expect applicants to have that prior experience.
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: Chris Brown

James Wakefield

Legendary Member
Premium Member
Oct 7, 2024
283
730
Just jumping in before @Ram Sabaratnam can also come back to you, I would say the default expectation is that you would have some legal work experience when applying for a direct TC, but that comes with two important caveats:
  1. That experience can be a whole lot less substantial than you would think: I know multiple people who had no past vacation schemes or paralegal work experiences, whose CV was limited to one internship (bordering at the line of a shadowing experience) at a not very well-known firm from a foreign country, who still managed to get TC offers in the summer.
  2. Absence of such experience is not an insurmountable obstacle, at least with some firms: I have also heard of cases of people with no legal work experience beyond Forage Virtual Internships getting TCs in the summer at lesser-known UK firms, so I think it may be worth a shot even if you do not have any. However, I would first take a look on the firm's website to see that they have not stated they expect applicants to have that prior experience.
Thanks Andrei. Would you recommend including upcoming vacation schemes on your direct TC applications to try and boost your ‘legal experience’ element?
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: Chris Brown

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
715
1,321
@Andrei Radu Hi :)

Please could I quickly check something with you. Firstly, firms that are currently advertising for a TC commencing September 2027, will they want trainees to start SQE studies in 2026 or 2025? Secondly, do you know how likely it is that despite advertising for a 2027 intake, they may consider 2026 intake? Thank you so much!!
If they advertise a TC commencing in 2027, they likely want you to start the SQE in 2026, so as to study together with your trainee cohort and to be able to start the job immediately afterwards. For the second questions, they may be able to consider switching you to the 2026 cohort; but from my experience they will likely prefer not to and I would not raise my hopes too high in that regard. This is a situation firms often find themselves in when recruiting from different year groups and they know most people do not want any breaks between university, SQE, and the start of the actual TC. As such, to avoid "opening up the floodgates" of earlier start requests, they might have quite a strict policy in this regard.

That said, I know of multiple cases where people managed to successfully negotiate this. Factors that can help for that purpose are holding another TC offer (as this will give you significant bargaining power) or there being dropouts from the 2026 cohort. However, there is no harm in asking (so long as you do it in an appropriate manner) even in absence of that. Worse case scenario, if there is no possibility to start earlier, you will have a good chance of perhaps securing a paralegal opportunity for the free year.
 
Last edited:

3000to1shoteverytime

Legendary Member
Dec 9, 2023
185
230
If they advertise a TC commencing in 2027, they likely want you to start the SQE in 2025, so as to study together with your trainee cohort and to be able to start the job immediately afterwards. For the second questions, they may be able to consider switching you to the 2026 cohort; but from my experience they will likely prefer not to and I would not raise my hopes too high in that regard. This is a situation firms often find themselves in when recruiting from different year groups and they know most people do not want any breaks between university, SQE, and the start of the actual TC. As such, to avoid "opening up the floodgates" of earlier start requests, they might have quite a strict policy in this regard.

That said, I know of multiple cases where people managed to successfully negotiate this. Factors that can help for that purpose are holding another TC offer (as this will give you significant bargaining power) or there being dropouts from the 2026 cohort. However, there is no harm in asking (so long as you do it in an appropriate manner) even in absence of that. Worse case scenario, if there is no possibility to start earlier, you will have a good chance of perhaps securing a paralegal opportunity for the free year.
I assume for non-law grads the 2 years is to allow PGDL in year 1 and SQE year 2. So I always thought the law student might do their SQE in the second gap year so the trainees all starting together in 2027 would be studying SQE all together from September 2026?
 
Reactions: Chris Brown

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
715
1,321
Thanks Andrei. Would you recommend including upcoming vacation schemes on your direct TC applications to try and boost your ‘legal experience’ element?
I would. Besides this definitely being valuable legal work experience, having a VS offer is a very impressive achievement that will immediately distinguish you from the majority of other applicants. Essentially, I believe it has the effect of instantly communicating to graduate recruitment that you were deemed to be a top 98-99% percentile candidate by a peer firm. This will invariably have an important impact in both (i) boosting up your candidate profile; and (ii) making graduate recruiters look at your application through different eyes, and thus making it more likely they will rate other aspects of it higher as well.

Even if they wanted to assess the rest of it independently and objectively, there is a lot of research in social psychology indicating that knowledge of peer opinions has a prevailing impact on one's evaluative judgements. This is particularly impactful in situations presenting a high degree of ambiguity and discretion, and I would argue the decision of whether to classify an application as a whole (so, one involving the multi-faceted assessment of a lot of factors) as "good, but not quite impressive enough" or "great, impressive enough to progress" has exactly those features.

As such, my view is that you would be doing yourself a disservice in not including the upcoming scheme. However, you can try to reduce the risk of it seeming like you put it there merely for purposes of impressing by adding in the description section (i) a short summary as to why you had applied for this firm and what your general applications strategy has been; and/or (ii) the seats you will do in the scheme and the work you expect to complete; and how that will be relevant for the development of your skills.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
715
1,321
I assume for non-law grads the 2 years is to allow PGDL in year 1 and SQE year 2. So I always thought the law student might do their SQE in the second gap year so the trainees all starting together in 2027 would be studying SQE all together from September 2026?
You are completely right, just realised I wrote 2025 instead of 2026 by mistake in my other post, corrected it now 😅. Also, besides this, since a substantial number of the law undergrads who applied will have been penultimate years, they will also have the final year to finish in 2025 and thus will only be able to start the SQE in 2026.
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.