TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
442
667
Work Experience Section of Application
How does everyone structure their answers in the work experience section of applications? I have been bullet pointing my responsibilities and then writing a few words on what I got out of the role.

Do any of you tie these answers into the firm you're applying to? Or do any of you answer this section any differently? Grateful to get responses from people who have successfully received VS's and TC's.
For shorter/less substantive work experiences (say, a Forage course) I think a few sentences describing the nature of the main tasks you completed will suffice. For longer/more substantive experiences (say, a part time job or internship) I think you would ideally use the STAR structure: describe the situation of the job (how you applied, context etc), tasks you were assigned, actions you took to complete them, and any results in terms of feedback or performance metrics. I would also sparingly make some inferences as to skills this demonstrates.

As for your other question, I think you can connect the experience with the firm, especially if there are any overlaps with your 'why the firm' motivations or the firm's USPS. However, I would only do so where there is a natural way to connect the two instead of pulling at straws. The other point I wanted to make here is to be mindful of how you make use of the work experience in application form answers to avoid being repetitive.

For your use, I copied here one of my more substantive work experience answers I used in one of my successful applications. I did not make use of the full STAR structure because I already explained the context and my feedback in one of the application form, but I thought the example may still be useful:

During my one month at X firm, I mainly worked in the Litigation and Corporate departments. In litigation, I gained experience in complex cross-border disputes by conducting extensive legal research into the validity of choice of court clauses, workplace discrimination and fictitious accounting. I also honed my public speaking skills by preparing and delivering a 30-minute presentation in front of the entire firm. Together with a fellow intern, I discussed the cases in which a lawyer can be legally obligated to testify as a witness against his own client.

In corporate, I improved my attention to detail by researching and then drafting client emails about the validity of powers of attorney issued before a change in a company’s management. I also enhanced my understanding of complex M&A deals by conducting research on the legal implications of a subsidiary acquiring the parent company with a consequent reduction in share capital.

Finally, I developed my organisational skills by completing cross-departmental tasks, such as sending weekly emails to the entire firm with a summary of recent legislative and regulatory changes for each practice area.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
442
667
For interview questions that are 'what would you do' in a certain situation - do we need to give an example from our experience that relates to the question?
For these questions I think it is normally not necessary to speak a lot from your own experience. The aim of the interviewer is more to see if you have structured way of considering an action plan when dealing with a problem or situation you have not encountered before and if you are generally aware of the resources and support you can use in the firm. It is also meant to test out a number of skills, such as thinking on the spot, problem-solving, initiative, and collaboration. I would thus simply focus on doing the best job of walking the interviewer through my thought process while showcasing these desired attributes. To the extent any points you are making can be further supported by something you have learnt from an actual experience, that is of course helpful to add, but I would not be continuously searching for these examples while answering the question.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
442
667
Kirkland VI - any advice?
Hi! Congratulations!!! I received an invitation for the VI as well. Do you have any tips on how I should prepare for it? Thanks!
Does anyone have advice about the Willkie VI?
I do not have any advice specific to Kirkland, Willkie, or Weil, but since a number of people have been asking for VI advice I thought it may be useful to link again my Guide to Competency Interviews. It is based on my and other successful candidates' experiences and includes a step by step VI preparation guide and a list of top tips to keep in mind as you are completing it. In my experience, most VIs are quite similar, and by following this approach I got progressed 4/5 times.
 

NCTC2025

Esteemed Member
Gold Member
Premium Member
  • Nov 27, 2022
    80
    169
    Does anyone have advice on this BCLP question?

    "Please describe a time where you showed courage in the face of adversity. What was the situation and how did you react?"

    I'm not really sure what the firm means by "show courage". Would this just be a resilience response or are they looking for something more?
     

    Eye of the Sun

    New Member
    Nov 6, 2024
    4
    4
    @Andrei Radu
    Hi Andrei, I had two quick questions about Davis Polk application form.

    First, in terms of why we are attracted to the work DP carries out, how would you go about it to make sure your answer is persuasive enough?

    I was told that DP requires a CV for partners to use during interview, but I cannot see anywhere in the application form a section for uploading our CV. Is this something you prepared later?

    Thank you
     

    ilovegardening1111

    Active Member
    Premium Member
    Nov 12, 2024
    13
    3
    I got a 2.1 (62.5%). I got several ACs last cycle. White & Case. Latham & Watkins. Ropes & Gray. I think you should try here. It's just one firm of many. Don't restrict yourself when there's time. Just go for it and try.
    Congratulations on getting so many ACs at great law firms first of all! I wondered if you had legal experience? And if you went to a RG or Oxbridge university? If you dont mind answering
     

    fcac98

    Star Member
    Premium Member
    Dec 16, 2024
    29
    17
    For shorter/less substantive work experiences (say, a Forage course) I think a few sentences describing the nature of the main tasks you completed will suffice. For longer/more substantive experiences (say, a part time job or internship) I think you would ideally use the STAR structure: describe the situation of the job (how you applied, context etc), tasks you were assigned, actions you took to complete them, and any results in terms of feedback or performance metrics. I would also sparingly make some inferences as to skills this demonstrates.

    As for your other question, I think you can connect the experience with the firm, especially if there are any overlaps with your 'why the firm' motivations or the firm's USPS. However, I would only do so where there is a natural way to connect the two instead of pulling at straws. The other point I wanted to make here is to be mindful of how you make use of the work experience in application form answers to avoid being repetitive.

    For your use, I copied here one of my more substantive work experience answers I used in one of my successful applications. I did not make use of the full STAR structure because I already explained the context and my feedback in one of the application form, but I thought the example may still be useful:

    During my one month at X firm, I mainly worked in the Litigation and Corporate departments. In litigation, I gained experience in complex cross-border disputes by conducting extensive legal research into the validity of choice of court clauses, workplace discrimination and fictitious accounting. I also honed my public speaking skills by preparing and delivering a 30-minute presentation in front of the entire firm. Together with a fellow intern, I discussed the cases in which a lawyer can be legally obligated to testify as a witness against his own client.

    In corporate, I improved my attention to detail by researching and then drafting client emails about the validity of powers of attorney issued before a change in a company’s management. I also enhanced my understanding of complex M&A deals by conducting research on the legal implications of a subsidiary acquiring the parent company with a consequent reduction in share capital.

    Finally, I developed my organisational skills by completing cross-departmental tasks, such as sending weekly emails to the entire firm with a summary of recent legislative and regulatory changes for each practice area.
    I really appreciate this answer, thank you!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Andrei Radu

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.