Ngl i really don't think they care in that section, i imagine that would go in the mitigating circumstances boxThank you. There is that, but was wondering if I should go into detail as to why I failed and what I did better, etc.
Ngl i really don't think they care in that section, i imagine that would go in the mitigating circumstances boxThank you. There is that, but was wondering if I should go into detail as to why I failed and what I did better, etc.
Thank you for helping me out!Ngl i really don't think they care in that section, i imagine that would go in the mitigating circumstances box
Springwas this for the summer or spring VS?
Hi Amma,Hey @KSV , It’s a possibility for sure. However, my general approach is to not engage in political discussions in interviews unless asked.
Hi @Soprano the way I see it, this question aims to test you in three key areas: (i) a classic 'why you' justification; (ii) your knowledge of Ropes & Gray and the particular skills and traits they may be looking for; and (iii) an ability to connect those that with what makes the firm's business success. As such, I think what you should do is:Ropes & Gray: Describe three characteristics that you believe make an outstanding Ropes & Gray lawyer and how that lawyer would drive our business. (500 words max) Does this question require answering why I am suited as a Ropes & Gray lawyer? Some general advise will also be appreciated. Thanks! @Andrei Radu @Ram Sabaratnam
Hi @mfuturetrainee just to jump in before @Amma Usman comes back to you, I think there should be no issue with discussing this topic as long as you ensure your analysis remains very descriptive and as long as you are careful the language you use is very 'neutral'. While I agree with Amma that discussing politics unprompted in an interview is not a good idea, I believe it is fine to talk about the impact of different policies on businesses (and how that consequently impacts law firms).Hi Amma,
I just wanted to bounce off this and ask another q related to this. So the firm I'm applying to is quite strong in EM and so I wanted to potentially talk about how the US tariffs would impact the trade deals in EMs going forward as a topical issue if I were to be asked. Would you still advice against it?
It's situational 😊—something like 'Do you prefer working in a team or individually?' - very straightforward. No preparation is needed really...Does anyone have any insights for the Fieldfisher second stage assessment for direct TC? Apparently, it only lasts 5 minutes and is held by a company called ''Neurosight'' 😅 Can't find any practise tests for it online!
Is anyone else unable to submit their application for the Cooley Open Day? It keeps on saying my application data cannot be found. I have emailed GR, but I'm pretty nervous as the deadline is tomorrow!
ok! that makes sense, so pretty much don't give a strong opinion of either or, just focus on the facts and the impact! sorry, just want to double check since i brought it up in a video interview ahaha but i just focused on how the tariffs could impact investor confidence in EMs and how it looks less favourable to invest there when the dollar is strengthening etc and how the firm's practice areas would get involvedHi @mfuturetrainee just to jump in before @Amma Usman comes back to you, I think there should be no issue with discussing this topic as long as you ensure your analysis remains very descriptive and as long as you are careful the language you use is very 'neutral'. While I agree with Amma that discussing politics unprompted in an interview is not a good idea, I believe it is fine to talk about the impact of different policies on businesses (and how that consequently impacts law firms).
However, do refrain from making value-judgements about the merits of the policies, and try to detach your descriptive analysis of the impact of a policy from partisan lens. Essentially, I would only make the comments related to impact that a reasonable economist on either side of the political spectrum would likely agree with.
sorry to hear this! When did you apply.Simmons PFO bc they are ''at capacity'' and ''can't transfer my application to another scheme'' 😢
wow, that's kinda awful. suddenly I feel good about my "you did not pass this part of our assessment". a clean "you failed."Simmons PFO bc they are ''at capacity'' and ''can't transfer my application to another scheme'' 😢
11 October for the WVS!sorry to hear this! When did you apply.
Hey @applebunny I would not worry too much about this. First of all, it is actually quite hard to cheat in a WG as for many questions even consistently high-scoring candidates will have to 'go with their gut'. Secondly, graduate recruiters are well aware that because of that, the WG scores of the same candidates can significantly vary between different tests. They will also be especially aware of this in the context of an AC, where people in the past will have also struggled with nerves.I somehow scored 36/40 in wg for Linklaters but I heard you have to retake it at the AC. It was my first attempt and I am worried I won't be able to do as well when I redo it especially due to nerves as it will be my first AC. How badly do I have to do for them to reject me post-AC because of it or think that I cheated the first time?