TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

[NCTC2025]

To anyone still waiting on Hogan Lovells, was told by grad rec recently that they're still running ACs and the final one will be on 18th March!

 

[AZ97]

Safe to say if no response from weil post-AC yet then its a pfo?

 

[VVV]

Safe to say if no response from weil post-AC yet then its a pfo?

Know some have been rejected so might be a maybe pile and we hear Monday? Not sure tho. Have you heard a lot of people getting offers?

 

[AS24]

Hi guys,

For those who completed the LPC at BPP, did you receive a signed and stamped certificate from them to prove your completion? I have been offered a new job, and they need this paper otherwise, I cannot start. I gave them my official transcript and the number of the tutor who usually provides firms with my reference.

@Jessica Booker, I have not signed the newly issued employment contract, in the meantime, I have been contacted for a job interview, which I would like to attend. If this goes well, can I reject the other job offer?

 

[loe]

To anyone still waiting on Hogan Lovells, was told by grad rec recently that they're still running ACs and the final one will be on 18th March!

Do you know if they have sent out all AC invites yet?

 

[Bloo]

Hi all, has anyone done the Pinsent Masons Forage experience/ have any general advice on how to prioritise emails?

I'm prepping for their AC which has an inbox/in-tray exercise. PM's forage has a task where you need to review emails and rank the order you would respond to, so I think assesses similar things to the AC exercise.

The correct answers for how you should prioritise are really different from how I would go about it so I am seriously confused.

E.g. they say to prioritise responding to an email from a partner (sent 4pm the day before) asking for a summary of changes in the legislation in the next few days BEFORE
1) an associate's email saying they need something 'as soon as possible to ensure the bank can fund the deal by 2pm', and
2) an urgent email from your supervisor at 9am saying they need your help summarising something 'sufficiently ahead' of 11am

Am I missing something? I would honestly have put the email from the partner as not that urgent and can be dealt with by the end of the week. Does anyone have any insight as to why this order? @Jessica Booker

 

[Careergal]

Does anyone please have any tips for NRF AC (its online) Can exchange info for Links (last year) & HSF

 

[vr36]

Know some have been rejected so might be a maybe pile and we hear Monday? Not sure tho. Have you heard a lot of people getting offers?

Also surely if they have filled all spots by now, they would have just sent rejections on the same day?

Safe to say if no response from weil post-AC yet then its a pfo?

Anyone else yet to hear? Any thoughts?

 

[applicant457]

Anyone have Spark VI insight? anyone done it?

 

[Jessica Booker]

Hi guys,

For those who completed the LPC at BPP, did you receive a signed and stamped certificate from them to prove your completion? I have been offered a new job, and they need this paper otherwise, I cannot start. I gave them my official transcript and the number of the tutor who usually provides firms with my reference.

@Jessica Booker, I have not signed the newly issued employment contract, in the meantime, I have been contacted for a job interview, which I would like to attend. If this goes well, can I reject the other job offer?

Yes - you can renege on a job offer quite easily unless you have taken any financial support from them ahead of joining.

 

[Jessica Booker]

Hi all, has anyone done the Pinsent Masons Forage experience/ have any general advice on how to prioritise emails?

I'm prepping for their AC which has an inbox/in-tray exercise. PM's forage has a task where you need to review emails and rank the order you would respond to, so I think assesses similar things to the AC exercise.

The correct answers for how you should prioritise are really different from how I would go about it so I am seriously confused.

E.g. they say to prioritise responding to an email from a partner (sent 4pm the day before) asking for a summary of changes in the legislation in the next few days BEFORE
1) an associate's email saying they need something 'as soon as possible to ensure the bank can fund the deal by 2pm', and
2) an urgent email from your supervisor at 9am saying they need your help summarising something 'sufficiently ahead' of 11am

Am I missing something? I would honestly have put the email from the partner as not that urgent and can be dealt with by the end of the week. Does anyone have any insight as to why this order? @Jessica Booker

I don’t understand the logic of that order they are suggesting either.

 

[c3alg]

should I assume PFO from CRS if I haven't heard back yet post VI for London SVS

 

[loe]

should I assume PFO from CRS if I haven't heard back yet post VI for London SVS

I don't think so. I haven't seen anyone receive AC invites yet... could be wrong tho

 

[c3alg]

I don't think so. I haven't seen anyone receive AC invites yet... could be wrong tho

I saw a few people received holding emails on friday - there isn't an ac before the svs

 

[DolphinShades44]

should I assume PFO from CRS if I haven't heard back yet post VI for London SVS

Based on last year's responses for CRS post VI they were pushing into March so I wouldn't assume anything just yet!

 

[User5678]

Age isn't why I'm feeling stuck. Laziness is the reason - anyone else?

I feel you because same. I am just lazy and keep procrastinating😭

 

[xxrr.18]

Does anyone please have any tips for NRF AC (its online) Can exchange info for Links (last year) & HSF

I'll PM you

 

[trainee4u]

Hi all, has anyone done the Pinsent Masons Forage experience/ have any general advice on how to prioritise emails?

I'm prepping for their AC which has an inbox/in-tray exercise. PM's forage has a task where you need to review emails and rank the order you would respond to, so I think assesses similar things to the AC exercise.

The correct answers for how you should prioritise are really different from how I would go about it so I am seriously confused.

E.g. they say to prioritise responding to an email from a partner (sent 4pm the day before) asking for a summary of changes in the legislation in the next few days BEFORE
1) an associate's email saying they need something 'as soon as possible to ensure the bank can fund the deal by 2pm', and
2) an urgent email from your supervisor at 9am saying they need your help summarising something 'sufficiently ahead' of 11am

Am I missing something? I would honestly have put the email from the partner as not that urgent and can be dealt with by the end of the week. Does anyone have any insight as to why this order? @Jessica Booker

I just checked it, it is clearly nonsense/error.

The emails with the 'correct' order

1. a partner at 4pm yesterday (Tuesday) emailed to say they are meeting a client next Tuesday and has asked for a page of bullet points on cost impacts of new building legislation by next Monday midday, latest, to prep for said meeting.
2. you've been asked by an associate at 09:04 to compile a signature pack for a client to fund the deal in advance of 2pm bank closing
3. your supervisor has emailed at 09:01, marked urgent, saying that you need to download property for an unspecified number of titles from the Land Registry, from a spreadsheet, note the charges on those properties, compile this into an email, and send it to them "sufficiently in advance of 11am"
4. a trainee at 08:54 working on a new deal emailed to ask where is a template for property title red flags
5. a paralegal has some signed documents and asked yesterday at 7pm where to send them
6. graduate recruitment emailed yesterday at 5pm asking for a reply to a simple "which career fairs" could you attend by CoB today
7. a client email sent last night at 8pm saying that "following their purchase" last month, they want an email on the law on whether they have a right to drive over neighbouring land to access their property, and will then discuss by phone
8. an HR email to submit seat choices by next Wednesday at 3pm, sent this morning.
9. an HR survey on training effectiveness, specifically stated to take 20 minutes, and required by CoB next Monday, which was sent several weeks ago

Of these:

• item 1 is time-consuming, and not urgent, so is definitely in the wrong place
• items 2 and 3 are very urgent, and are clearly two top priorities. it's not really clear how long these will take, but I think they are in the wrong order, in that "sufficiently in advance" implies that this is not going to take you that long to do.
• items 4, 5, 6 can be answered quickly so should be. The priority order here is roughly correct, in that 4 & 5 might be holding people up.
• item 7 is time-consuming and can come after completing the trivial tasks and the two urgent tasks, and before item 1
• item 8 and 9 are probably in the wrong order? There might be reasons why you have not decided your next seat yet, and it's not clear why you'd answer this before you have to.

Overall it's a poor-quality task, as they don't give any feedback for their order, which I assume is down to a clerical/programming error.

I would go:

3
2
5
4
6
7
1
9
8