It's TCLA's birthday today. Thank you Guest for joining us in this journey. We are seven years old :). For today only, you can use 'SEVEN' for 50% off TCLA Premium Gold and TCLA Academy.
Noooo I applied 27th Dec and was so hopeful for MoFo 🥲 congratulations though!I wasn't going to answer as well lol! I applied on the 3rd of January, a few days before deadline I think
I don’t think it’s right to assume based on tone of a post whether someone is trying to seek extra adjustments that they may or may not be entitled to.
If grad rec reached out to them, surely it must have been included in their original application. I don’t think there was a need to assume they were self diagnosing neurodivergence either.
There were adjustments I had in school that do not bare relevance anymore. Similarly, having gone through this application cycle, I have requested adjustments I didn’t need before, such as around interview formats.
Guys, this is not what this forum is for!!! What is the point in disputing about a possible misunderstanding- when all someone asked for is some advice, because MAYBE they wanted to be sure of something before asking Grad recruitment- there is NOTHING wrong with this, and we should encourage everyone to ask questions!!!He literally asked “does anyone know what I can get”.
“Has anyone been successful in getting the questions in advance”
I’m sorry, but how is anyone reading that not going to have alarm bells ringing?
It sounds exactly like they’re trying to game the system. If they really wanted to know what adjustments they were entitled to, they would not come on here trying to see what other adjustments people have got.
That’s like saying you’re allergic to nuts and can’t eat nuts and require dietary restrictions because some random user like “bigboy101” on TCLA is allergic to nuts. Please explain this logic to me?
I was under the impression they were seeking clarity over reasonable adjustments. Perhaps they wanted to be sure of what can be deemed reasonable adjustments by asking people on the forum about their experience.He literally asked “does anyone know what I can get”.
“Has anyone been successful in getting the questions in advance”
I’m sorry, but how is anyone reading that not going to have alarm bells ringing?
It sounds exactly like they’re trying to game the system. If they really wanted to know what adjustments they were entitled to, they would not come on here trying to see what other adjustments people have got.
That’s like saying you’re allergic to nuts and can’t eat nuts and require dietary restrictions because some random user like “bigboy101” on TCLA is allergic to nuts. Please explain this logic to me?
I think the difference between the example you mentioned and the reality of being neurodivergent/dealing with a health condition is that there can be a whole bunch of different reasonable adjustments based on the circumstances. For example, at university, I ended up getting different reasonable adjustments in comparison to what I was given for the SQE. Though there might be reasonable adjustments in common, these may change based on the nature of the tasks you're doing.He literally asked “does anyone know what I can get”.
“Has anyone been successful in getting the questions in advance”
I’m sorry, but how is anyone reading that not going to have alarm bells ringing?
It sounds exactly like they’re trying to game the system. If they really wanted to know what adjustments they were entitled to, they would not come on here trying to see what other adjustments people have got.
That’s like saying you’re allergic to nuts and can’t eat nuts and require dietary restrictions because some random user like “bigboy101” on TCLA is allergic to nuts. Please explain this logic to me?
Guys, this is not what this forum is for!!! What is the point in disputing about a possible misunderstanding- when all someone asked for is some advice, because MAYBE they wanted to be sure of something before asking Grad recruitment- there is NOTHING wrong with this, and we should encourage everyone to ask questions!!!
I don’t want to turn this into a dispute either. But I don’t want people to be disingenuous and lack integrity either. Especially if they are applying to a profession where they will be bound by a code of conduct…I was under the impression they were seeking clarity over reasonable adjustments. Perhaps they wanted to be sure of what can be deemed reasonable adjustments by asking people on the forum about their experience.
I don’t want this to turn into a dispute. 🙂
I just received this email as well. I applied for the Spring VC so end of Feb seems quite tight. Am I safe to assume PFO?just got this from Latham's after not hearing if I have progressed for an AC "Due to the volume of applications we received we are still working through reviewing these. We are therefore hoping to provide you with a further update on the status of your application within the end of February."
I didn’t copy your post word for word. I can see there are some similarities but that might be because those are the common examples of reasonable adjustments people are offered.did you copy my post word for word 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
I applied for Spring too and have zero hope lolI just received this email as well. I applied for the Spring VC so end of Feb seems quite tight. Am I safe to assume PFO?
Coming in on this late 😅 but if you think an adjustment will be helpful, I think it’s worth asking, they can then consider whether or not it is something they can do. I would also consider messaging @Jessica Booker as she may be able to advise based on your specific needs.Hi, grad rec have reached out and asked about reasonable adjustments for AC.
Apart from extra time - does anyone know what adjustments I can get for being neurodiverse?
Has anyone ever been successful in getting the interview questions in advance?
Yeah I got that too, when I saw it I was immediately thinking PFO.just got this from Latham's after not hearing if I have progressed for an AC "Due to the volume of applications we received we are still working through reviewing these. We are therefore hoping to provide you with a further update on the status of your application within the end of February."
My number one tip would be to be very specific in your answers. Instead of answering generically or repeating what you have already mentioned in your application such as to ‘why the firm’, try and add new reasonings or build on your previous answers with very specific and detailed examples. This has worked well for me currently!Hi everyone @Amma Usman @Ram Sabaratnam @Andrei Radu could I please get some advice on video interviews? Would also love to hear some thoughts from my peers who went from failing VIs to passing. Have received VI PFOs from Clyde & Co, DWF, Reed Smith, Baker McKenzie & CMS. So all tips welcome please as I do not know what I am doing wrong.
Hi,I don’t want to turn this into a dispute either. But I don’t want people to be disingenuous and lack integrity either. Especially if they are applying to a profession where they will be bound by a code of conduct…