TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

[Will123]

Hi there, I have a question regarding the Marriott Harrison VS application. One of the questions is: "Where do you see your career in five years, and how does this align with the work Marriott Harrison does?" Would greatly appreciate some pointers on how to approach this question, and how to differentiate my answer from the "why this firm" style question. @Amma Usman @Andrei Radu @Ram Sabaratnam @Jessica Booker

 

[floral.tcla]

For Mayer Brown's SJT, normally I'm quite cautious in answering questions as I'd be a trainee who's very junior, but on their website it says they really like creativity and innovation. So, should my answers be a bit more geared towards risk/like pursuing novel alternatives if there's a case for it, or to be conservative?

 

[floral.tcla]

apparently some S&M applicants are getting interviews - if I haven't heard back from slaughters and may does it mean I'm screwed? (doubly since my grades are at oxbridge but a low 2:1)

 

[floral.tcla]

Yeah most people will be talking about Spring on here, for which the deadline has already passed. Summer is fine.

thanks - sorry just seen this

 

[murm]

Hi there, I have a question regarding the application for Cooley's Summer Programme. I attended the Meet Cooley event in November and as part of the application for that, we had to answer "What is motivating you toward a career at Cooley?" and "Please tell us about interests and activities you pursue and positions of responsibility that are relevant for the role." However, those questions are also required for the Summer Programme application (as well as two others), and so, I was wondering if it is necessary to change the answers completely or just add in a few bits about the Meet Cooley event for the why Cooley question and then leave the interests and activities answer the same? Would appreciate some advice!

I also attended the event and that's what I am doing. I don't think it is necessary to rewrite if you are happy with the answer.

 

[suhana]

apparently some S&M applicants are getting interviews - if I haven't heard back from slaughters and may does it mean I'm screwed? (doubly since my grades are at oxbridge but a low 2:1)

i haven't heard back either, i applied nov 25

 

[rjn]

does anyone have any advice for the mischon video interview, or know what questions to prepare for?

 

[Reem2024]

CMS VI is genuinely the hardest one. Because they had such open ended questions with sm to cover in only 1 minute.

 

[Amma Usman]

Hi there, I have a question regarding the Marriott Harrison VS application. One of the questions is: "Where do you see your career in five years, and how does this align with the work Marriott Harrison does?" Would greatly appreciate some pointers on how to approach this question, and how to differentiate my answer from the "why this firm" style question. @Amma Usman @Andrei Radu @Ram Sabaratnam @Jessica Booker

Hey there @Will123 ,

This is a really good question. It often got me thinking during the application cycle last year too.

The way I see it, there is a difference between this particular question and ‘why X firm’. The reason is because why X firm directly requires you to focus on the work of a firm and why it appeals, whereas this question focuses more on how you’ve envisioned your career to go, more generally, in the next 5 years.

There are a plethora of things you could include on this. As opposed to the strict why firm question, this enables you to really touch honestly on your plans and how it aligns with MH. For example, if your goal is to go into a certain practice area, your answer will benefit from touching on what steps you have taken to get knowldge on it, and how you plan on building this in the next 5 years. This will surely need to be a practice the firm is well-versed in to substantiate why you want to explore it there, over other firms. Similarly, say you are drawn to a certain type of pro-bono, explain why. Subsequently, touch on why the firm may be able to support this - perhaps they are known for supporting refugees or have a strong domestic abuse advisory practice? The crux of the question is really understanding two things: (1) your plans (2) how and why you believe the firm can support that. The two questions you mentioned are certainly similar, but the first has subtle differences.

I have drafted a short response to a question of this type to give you an example of how I would personally answer it. I hope it provides more insights structure-wise:

Other than day-to-day practice area related work, I envision my career in the next five years to involve a variety of pro bono work. I am particularly drawn to supporting victims of displacement claim asylum. The reason I am drawn to exploring this stems from my role as a founder of a charity headquartered in France, where I work to supercharge the educational opportunities of children in similar situations. I admire the breadth of exposure working at a global law firm offers, particularly in relation to expanding the base of individuals I can support legally. My desire to build this foundation further at ABC specifically, stems from the firm‘s role in advising on the largest XYZ in Europe. The opportunity to work on similar deals, within a niche as specialised as this, is an opportunity many firms may not necessarily offer me.

 

[Amma Usman]

For Mayer Brown's SJT, normally I'm quite cautious in answering questions as I'd be a trainee who's very junior, but on their website it says they really like creativity and innovation. So, should my answers be a bit more geared towards risk/like pursuing novel alternatives if there's a case for it, or to be conservative?

Hey there @floral.tcla ,

Unfortunately, there is no correct answer to this. What is considered right or wrong differs per question. I’d say to just always trust your instinct. It’s great you’re bearing the firm’s values in mind whilst answering. I’ve usually kept these in mind when answering every question, and the approach has served me well. Above all, prior to clicking on an answer, ensure that it sits well with you - and what you will genuinely do in that situation. There is usually no perfect answer in an SJT. However, there are usually answers that are evidently wrong from the start. This is where you can start cancelling them out mentally to focus on weighing more likely accurate answers. With regards your other specific question, a mentor once told me that there is a certain level of mindfulness a trainee needs to possess to ensure that they make the most of the learning and development opportunity. However, this should not come at the expense of speaking up and conveying your views on a discussion. In fact, it is very much needed as you were hired for your opinion - hired to add value. So, I recommend keeping both approaches in mind whilst responding.

Best of luck, and I’m sure you'll do great!

 

[Jessica Booker]

For Mayer Brown's SJT, normally I'm quite cautious in answering questions as I'd be a trainee who's very junior, but on their website it says they really like creativity and innovation. So, should my answers be a bit more geared towards risk/like pursuing novel alternatives if there's a case for it, or to be conservative?

I'd suggest that creativity and innovation are quite different aspects to pursuing approaches that are risky. You can be creative/innovative and still be risk adverse in the way you test out/ensure quality in your outcomes.

 

[Will123]

Hey there @Will123 ,

This is a really good question. It often got me thinking during the application cycle last year too.

The way I see it, there is a difference between this particular question and ‘why X firm’. The reason is because why X firm directly requires you to focus on the work of a firm and why it appeals, whereas this question focuses more on how you’ve envisioned your career to go, more generally, in the next 5 years.

There are a plethora of things you could include on this. As opposed to the strict why firm question, this enables you to really touch honestly on your plans and how it aligns with MH. For example, if your goal is to go into a certain practice area, your answer will benefit from touching on what steps you have taken to get knowldge on it, and how you plan on building this in the next 5 years. This will surely need to be a practice the firm is well-versed in to substantiate why you want to explore it there, over other firms. Similarly, say you are drawn to a certain type of pro-bono, explain why. Subsequently, touch on why the firm may be able to support this - perhaps they are known for supporting refugees or have a strong domestic abuse advisory practice? The crux of the question is really understanding two things: (1) your plans (2) how and why you believe the firm can support that. The two questions you mentioned are certainly similar, but the first has subtle differences.

I have drafted a short response to a question of this type to give you an example of how I would personally answer it. I hope it provides more insights structure-wise:

Other than day-to-day practice area related work, I envision my career in the next five years to involve a variety of pro bono work. I am particularly drawn to supporting victims of displacement claim asylum. The reason I am drawn to exploring this stems from my role as a founder of a charity headquartered in France, where I work to supercharge the educational opportunities of children in similar situations. I admire the breadth of exposure working at a global law firm offers, particularly in relation to expanding the base of individuals I can support legally. My desire to build this foundation further at ABC specifically, stems from the firm‘s role in advising on the largest XYZ in Europe. The opportunity to work on similar deals, within a niche as specialised as this, is an opportunity many firms may not necessarily offer me.

Thank you so much! This is really helpful, especially your draft response!

 

[Amma Usman]

Hi @Amma Usman!
I had a question about this response. When writing the areas for growth and saying what I am doing to improve, should I include tangible results highlighting improvements? I am worried that providing these results suggest that it is no longer an area for growth per se.

Thanks a lot!

Hi there,

Yes, I recommend touching well on the progress so far - it shows you can set a plan on something and get positive results from adopting a focused approach to solving the issue. I see that you are also worried on it no longer appearing as an area for growth. The way I see it, growth is a consistent learning curve. There will always be more room for improvement, so consider mentioning how you intend on exercising that/building on it further, perhaps in a last sentence at the end.

 

[Amma Usman]

hey guys. anyone know if its still worth applying for summer vs of hogan lovells and white and case, considering they are rolling and deadlines are 3rd jan and 12th jan respectively and vi offers have started to go out?

Hey @suhana ,

Most firms receive the bulk of their applications in the last two weeks, so I believe there is no harm in doing so.

 

[zeydi]

For anyone who has taken the Assessment Centre at the Bank of England? How was your experience, was it very technical / what would you expect from programme/stream specific questions? please PM if you taken the test or have insights to it!

 

[zeydi]

Is there any guides or tips to best prepare for Group Exercises?

 

[Amma Usman]

Hi,
To anyone that can help please maybe @Andrei Radu or @Amma Usman.

I have my first AC coming up and I’m trying to research deals from the firm. Should I focus on deals from the same area or a wider range please?

Hi @EK_27 , congratulations on securing your first AC!

Are you referring to the same practice area you're interested in, or the same geographic region where the firm operates? Perhaps I’ll be able to shed more light then!

 

[floral.tcla]

Hey there @floral.tcla ,

Unfortunately, there is no correct answer to this. What is considered right or wrong differs per question. I’d say to just always trust your instinct. It’s great you’re bearing the firm’s values in mind whilst answering. I’ve usually kept these in mind when answering every question, and the approach has served me well. Above all, prior to clicking on an answer, ensure that it sits well with you - and what you will genuinely do in that situation. There is usually no perfect answer in an SJT. However, there are usually answers that are evidently wrong from the start. This is where you can start cancelling them out mentally to focus on weighing more likely accurate answers. With regards your other specific question, a mentor once told me that there is a certain level of mindfulness a trainee needs to possess to ensure that they make the most of the learning and development opportunity. However, this should not come at the expense of speaking up and conveying your views on a discussion. In fact, it is very much needed as you were hired for your opinion - hired to add value. So, I recommend keeping both approaches in mind whilst responding.

Best of luck, and I’m sure you'll do great!

Thank you so much!

 

[floral.tcla]

I'd suggest that creativity and innovation are quite different aspects to pursuing approaches that are risky. You can be creative/innovative and still be risk adverse in the way you test out/ensure quality in your outcomes.

Thank you!

 

[zeydi]

Hello, to anyone that can help me @Andrei Radu or @Amma Usman.

I have been invited to my first Virtual AC with a in-house company with group exercise, how would you reccomend hving a strategy to prepare for it or what should I focus in preparation anything I should be careful of to make a differnece.