TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

[Ram Sabaratnam]

@Andrei Radu @Jessica Booker @Ram Sabaratnam

How would you guys advise on answering the following application question: Imagine you are advising a client in one of our sectors who is facing a major commercial challenge. Identify a recent business or current affairs issue which may impact them and describe how you would determine the appropriate support they would need from 'X' firm.

Specifically, for the part which says '...how you would determine...', what does it mean by this ?

Thank in advance !

Hiya @abhuzaifa


Just adding to what was mentioned by @Jessica Booker here. From my initial reading of it, I think this question is definitely about showing a structured approach to understanding a client’s needs and how you would use the firm’s expertise to help them. For the “how you would determine” part, focus on explaining the steps you’d take to identify the support the client needs.

I think you could start by researching the client’s sector and then identifying an issue that you can convincingly explain would affect them. As Jess mentioned, you can then set out the specific steps that you'd take to assist them with the issue/challenge/news story you've identified. This could include mentioning attempts to engage with the client to understand their specific concerns, goals, and constraints; conducting any research into the legal and commercial implications of the issue; or using the firm’s resources, such as knowledge databases or 'knowledge lawyers', any market insights, or previous cases. You can also mention the role of collaboration within the firm's team to get a well-rounded understanding of the problem and potential solutions (e.g. perhaps you can mention consulting partners or senior associates with expertise in the client’s sector). I'd try to end off by suggesting whether there's a specific range of solutions that you might consider implementing (whether immediate advice on compliance or risk mitigation strategies).

Hope this is useful and helps prompt ideas for you! Good luck!

 

[AlegalA]

Heya @AlegalA

Would be curious to get thoughts from @Jessica Booker @Andrei Radu and @Amma Usman here, but based on my initial understanding of the question and a quick glance of their Chambers Student profile, I think the question is asking you to focus on a particular team/seat within your chosen sector (e.g., Health Litigation seat in the Health sector, or Tax and Financial Services seat in the Business Services).

When answering this question, it might be worth structuring your answer in the following way. Start by explaining the team/seat you're interested in, highlighting why that particular team/seat interests you within the sector. This is where you can also demonstrate some of your research not just in that particular sector, but also the sort of work that's typically carried out for clients when you're sat in that team/seat. You can also use this section to demonstrate an understanding of Hill Dickinson’s work in that sector, perhaps referencing a recent deal or case done by the team. Finally, I'd tie your response to specific skills, experiences, or interests that align with the work of that team. That is, you'll want to briefly say why that work resonates with you.

Hope this helps and let us know if you have any other questions! Best of luck with your application 🥳

Thank you so much!

 

[AlegalA]

Hellooo I have a question,

I am currently applying to Withers. I applied last year and got through to the test. The issue I have is that their questions are very very short (60w), and my answers to why law and why Withers have not changed enough for there to really be a change in my answer (Because of the word count the answers are relatively surface level).

Some questions I can obviously change (such as my biggest accomplishment, as it's been a year since the last one), but I'm unsure what to do for those two questions.

I can potentially tweak them slightly? Has anyone experienced this for Withers specifically (or any firm with a low word count, although I think Withers is the lowest!)

Thank you!!

@Ram Sabaratnam I was wondering if you might have an opinion on this?

 

[Ram Sabaratnam]

Hellooo I have a question,

I am currently applying to Withers. I applied last year and got through to the test. The issue I have is that their questions are very very short (60w), and my answers to why law and why Withers have not changed enough for there to really be a change in my answer (Because of the word count the answers are relatively surface level).

Some questions I can obviously change (such as my biggest accomplishment, as it's been a year since the last one), but I'm unsure what to do for those two questions.

I can potentially tweak them slightly? Has anyone experienced this for Withers specifically (or any firm with a low word count, although I think Withers is the lowest!)

Thank you!!

Hiya @AlegalA

I have thoughts (I think haha). I'd definitely be curious to know what @Andrei Radu and @Amma Usman might say here.

With such a tight word count, I think even small changes to your answers can make a difference. I’d suggest looking for subtle ways to refine your responses. For "Why law," you could think about how your understanding of or motivation for pursuing law might have deepened over the past year. Are there any new insights, experiences, or reflections you could incorporate? Even rephrasing your previous answers to make them more concise or impactful can give them a refreshed feel.

For "Why Withers," you could see whether anything about the firm has stood out to you more recently. Maybe there's a recent deal, initiative, or cultural aspect you’ve learned about that you can weave in. Updating this part, even slightly, could make your answer feel more current and tailored. If you’re finding it hard to tweak those two questions significantly, your updated answers to other questions, like your biggest accomplishment, will still help ensure your application feels fresh/updated overall.

Don’t stress too much about repeating some elements if they’re still true and relevant. The key is to focus on making each answer as clear, engaging, and precise as possible. Hope this helps!

 

[ashwright]

does anyone know if being <80 percentile for Linklaters’ Watson Glaser is fatal to the application? Or could a decent CAPP etc make up for it? Thank you

 

[lilymawe1]

does anyone know if being <80 percentile for Linklaters’ Watson Glaser is fatal to the application? Or could a decent CAPP etc make up for it? Thank you

From what I have heard (so anyone correct me if I am wrong), they seem to place greater emphasis on CAPP scores.

 

[mariistm]

Does anyone know what attributes Linklaters are actually looking for in the CAPP assessment? Every time i’ve done it I received different results and was rejected every time, but with no feedback you don’t know whether it’s the grades, CAPP or WG…

 

[Jessica Booker]

Hi guys, one of hill Dickinson's questions is "As a firm, we operate across a number of sectors and specialisms, and offer sector-specific training contracts in each of our business services, health and marine groups. Which of our teams would you be most interested in completing a seat in and why?"

Are they asking why we want to do the specific sector that we chose or a specific seat within that sector? Eg: Health sector or Employment NHS within the Health sector.

I think it is effectively alluding to both why the specialised programme and if there are any seats you specifically want to do within that area. It is probably to make sure you understand the realities of the different programmes to ensure you are best aligned to the sector specific programme you are choosing.

 

[NJS]

weird question, but to those who have done the Linklaters test, is the percentage on the application portal 77%?

 

[Tcvspfo]

Anyone applying for Weil this is of HIGH IMPORTANCE TO YOU!!!!!

 

[Legalstalker]

Anyone applying for Weil this is of HIGH IMPORTANCE TO YOU!!!!!

View attachment 6510

They don’t screen on a rolling basis but have given VI invites already?

 

[lilymawe1]

weird question, but to those who have done the Linklaters test, is the percentage on the application portal 77%?

Mine is at 66% and have also done both tests, I wonder what this means then?

 

[Tcvspfo]

They don’t screen on a rolling basis but have given VI invites already?

Yh ikr law firms are playing with our minds or they are trying to get less apps.

 

[lilymawe1]

They don’t screen on a rolling basis but have given VI invites already?

Yeah this did confuse me. I think they are technically non-rolling as although they review apps before deadline, they will review all submitted apps. I went to a Weil event this week and they again confirmed that all apps submitted pre-deadline will be reviewed.

 

[Legalstalker]

Mine is at 66% and have also done both tests, I wonder what this means then?

I’ve applied for a few things at Linklaters before. Based on my experience whenever I had 66% I had failed the WG (happened twice). When I got to 77% I assumed I had passed the WG. Though my percentile was bad, my mark out of 40 was decent enough to warrant a pass. Email graduate recruitment for your WG results. trainee.recruitment@linklaters.com

 

[Jessica Booker]

They don’t screen on a rolling basis but have given VI invites already?

Some firms work on the basis that rolling means that early screening stages can be done but that no offers will be made before the last person gets to the final interview/assessment stage.

 

[crt1s]

My friend just heard from Gowling for those waiting.

VI or rej?

 

[Legalstalker]

Do you remember what that mark was? I did the WG for their Open Day and got 31/40, but the percentile was 70 which is lower than I've gotten in a WG before (that I know the results on) - I didn't get onto the Open Day but hard to say if that was because of the WG or Capp. Still going to send a SVS application since I've already done both assessments for the Open Day and there aren't any application questions.

I do remember my mark. Percentiles are made up solely from how will you do one area the firm prioritises. You could get full marks in evaluating arguments and get half right in conclusions but the firm may value conclusions more arguments therefore your percentile is lower. I shared feedback reports with someone on here who got less answers right than myself but had a better percentile due to scoring better in areas Linklater values.

Also the CAPP test is measured around this frame. When you’re answering the questions ensure to look at this framework.​

 

[Law queries]

My friend just heard from Gowling for those waiting.

Invite or rejection?

 

[Legalstalker]

Some firms work on the basis that rolling means that early screening stages can be done but that no offers will be made before the last person gets to the final interview/assessment stage.

They said they don’t screen applications on a rolling basis. Is assume that would be an early stage? Sorry if I’m incorrect.