this is so valid!!lol I still want them, even if they don't want me 🤣🤣 Icl my spring applications need to come through
How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register Herethis is so valid!!lol I still want them, even if they don't want me 🤣🤣 Icl my spring applications need to come through
girl that is a situationship you can do better you dont chase you attractlol I still want them, even if they don't want me 🤣🤣 Icl my spring applications need to come through
I think Conclusion Follows; Conclusion Follows; Conclusion Does Not Follow; Conclusion Does Not Follow. What's the answer?Sorry can someone help me answer these - i have got most wrong on this one.
All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service. No normal pupil is intelligent. Therefore: Proposed Conclusions:
No member of a diplomatic service is a normal pupil.
Every intelligent pupil takes an active role in the service.
The normal pupil cannot be an active member of a diplomatic service.
Some members of a diplomatic service are abnormal pupils.
I am far from a Watson Glaser professional but I shall share my two pence (partly as practice!)Sorry can someone help me answer these - i have got most wrong on this one.
All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service. No normal pupil is intelligent. Therefore: Proposed Conclusions:
No member of a diplomatic service is a normal pupil.
Every intelligent pupil takes an active role in the service.
The normal pupil cannot be an active member of a diplomatic service.
Some members of a diplomatic service are abnormal pupils.
When approaching the statements, I like to start by (1.) doing a venn diagram and/or (2.) taking the contrapositive.All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service. No normal pupil is intelligent. Therefore:
With this statement, you learn two things: (1.) there's a class (aka group) of people called 'members of a diplomatic service'. (2.) all intelligent pupils are part of that class. This is a good statement to do a venn diagram for - big circle is the class - 'members of a diplomatic service'; within this circle, draw a circle to represent members - 'all intelligent pupils'.Statement 1: All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service.
With this, I like taking the contrapositive - this is a fancy way of flipping the statement back-to-front, then negating whatever was positive and vice-versa. It's a good thing to do - I definitely encourage having a look into it if you haven't. The contrapositive would be - "All intelligent pupils are not normal pupils". This is your learning number three.Statement 2: No normal pupil is intelligent.
what section was this for - deductions or interpretation?Sorry can someone help me answer these - i have got most wrong on this one.
All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service. No normal pupil is intelligent. Therefore: Proposed Conclusions:
No member of a diplomatic service is a normal pupil.
Every intelligent pupil takes an active role in the service.
The normal pupil cannot be an active member of a diplomatic service.
Some members of a diplomatic service are abnormal pupils.
Still waiting for HLfinally have been sent the Mayer Brown tests.
Is anyone else still waiting for HL test for summer?
when did u do ur acsomeone on the forum who did the a/c on 11 Nov received an offer last week, i did mine way earlier so i don't think they're considering me for any other schemes as winter clearly hadn't filled up yet. i guess just time to move on as annoying as it is
Yes ! Heard nothing from Hogan Lovells and applied a while agofinally have been sent the Mayer Brown tests.
Is anyone else still waiting for HL test for summer?
was rejected last weekIs anyone else that interviewed recently for the Sidley WVS still waiting to hear back?
Still in time to apply for Bird & Bird VS? As they are rolling?
Sorry to hear this. So bizarre I haven't heard back I even followed up earlier this week for an update.was rejected last week
Just did my CMS VI and was calm during preparation but my heart started beating at 200bpm once the video interview started and I WAS NERVOUS AND STUTTERING 😭😭 Im so disappointed but onto the next ig.. hope they don't long out my PFO
Anyone have any tips on the nerves? I feel super confident before but during I lose my composure instantly
honestly was so shocked as it felt like one of my best interviews, i did it on the 29thSorry to hear this. So bizarre I haven't heard back I even followed up earlier this week for an update.