TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5

[t-0147]

Thank you!

They do. I did one last year. Just email grad rec about it.

 

[BM99]

Has anyone heard from Links re Direct TC? Mine still on 66%

 

[24aa2001]

Please can someone help me, should I expect a PFO if people received an AC for Kennedys

 

[Tintin06]

@Jessica Booker what's your advice here? I'm not sure about raising this. I have Asperger's so somewhat unsure. Anyone else's insights would be appreciated. Thank you very much in advance.

 

[Raspberry44]

Received invite for Bristows VI. Any tips greatly appreciated!

Same here - really want to nail this one! Does anyone have any insights?

 

[pickyportkey]

Why is Slaughter and May silent... 🥹💔

 

[Zaraa.x]

Why is Slaughter and May silent... 🥹💔

Literally!! When did you apply?

 

[James Wakefield]

yes - it would be a new recruitment cycle.

So in an extreme case, you could be applying to the same firm 3 months apart?

 

[Jessica Booker]

So in an extreme case, you could be applying to the same firm 3 months apart?

I think Freshfields don’t have any vacancies open after 23 January, so would be more like 8-9 months.

 

[James Wakefield]

I think Freshfields don’t have any vacancies open after 23 January, so would be more like 8-9 months.

Ah sorry yes. I was just making a general point about direct TC apps that might close in June, and then Winter Vac ones which open from August/September.

 

[Jessica Booker]

View attachment 6681

@Jessica Booker what's your advice here? I'm not sure about raising this. I have Asperger's so somewhat unsure. Anyone else's insights would be appreciated. Thank you very much in advance.

There are a number of older cases with similar judgements. I am not completely up to date on employment law though, so cannot advise if this is the most up to date precedent/case that judgements would be used against.

Ultimately, you can ask for adjustments whether there are employment tribunal cases or not though.

 

[Jessica Booker]

Ah sorry yes. I was just making a general point about direct TC apps that might close in June, and then Winter Vac ones which open from August/September.

Check each firm’s individual policies on this, as some will say 12 months rather than a recruitment cycle. But if they say one application per cycle and their cycle restarts in the late summer/early autumn, then yes, you could apply 3-4 months after your earlier application.

It would be important to show a development in your application though, so I wouldn’t necessarily rush into reapplying so soon after your previous application.

 

[24aa2001]

Please can someone help me, should I expect a PFO if people received an AC for Kennedys

Pleaseee advise

 

[Jessica Booker]

Pleaseee advise

I don't think you can make that assumption.

 

[EK_27]

Hi everyone,

I don’t post often but wanted to say thank you for the support received on the forum. Specifically to @Amma Usman @Andrei Radu as I used your tips this cycle for my VI, AC and general commercial awareness.

I was offered a TC today so feeling very happy.

My first cycle I submitted 15 applications and only progressed to 1 VI.

Second cycle I submitted 11 applications and progressed to 2 VIs and 1 AC.

It’s really cliche but you do only need one firm to say yes. Wishing everyone the best of luck!!

 

[TCseeker17]

Hi everyone,

I don’t post often but wanted to say thank you for the support received on the forum. Specifically to @Amma Usman @Andrei Radu as I used your tips this cycle for my VI, AC and general commercial awareness.

I was offered a TC today so feeling very happy.

My first cycle I submitted 15 applications and only progressed to 1 VI.

Second cycle I submitted 11 applications and progressed to 2 VIs and 1 AC.

It’s really cliche but you do only need one firm to say yes. Wishing everyone the best of luck!!

Hey that's amazing news! Where did you get the TC offer if you don't mind me asking?

 

[Tintin06]

There are a number of older cases with similar judgements. I am not completely up to date on employment law though, so cannot advise if this is the most up to date precedent/case that judgements would be used against.

Ultimately, you can ask for adjustments whether there are employment tribunal cases or not though.

Realise bringing this up is dramatic. Thank you for your reply here.

 

[Jessica Booker]

Realise bringing this up is dramatic. Thank you for your reply here.

It’s not dramatic - it’s good to know what happens in terms of best practice, and case law will impact that on a certain level.

It is also useful to use decisions like this to reference why the adjustment is necessary.

Where I get slightly cautious on this is the autism is a broad spectrum of conditions and I think it’s really difficult to apply adjustments consistently. Ultimately any employer/recruiter (and their test provider) should be adapting processes with some basic “best practice” approaches, and I would expect some neurodiverse candidates to have an adjustment to an SJT. This is why many tests have no time requirement, but I would stress that I personally feel this is still not sufficient in many cases.

 

[Tintin06]

It’s not dramatic - it’s good to know what happens in terms of best practice, and case law will impact that on a certain level.

It is also useful to use decisions like this to reference why the adjustment is necessary.

Where I get slightly cautious on this is the autism is a broad spectrum of conditions and I think it’s really difficult to apply adjustments consistently. Ultimately any employer/recruiter (and their test provider) should be adapting processes with some basic “best practice” approaches, and I would expect some neurodiverse candidates to have an adjustment to an SJT. This is why many tests have no time requirement, but I would stress that I personally feel this is still not sufficient in many cases.

That all makes sense - thank you. I worry about bothering graduate recruitment. Also the perception of making excuses. Maybe this is just overthinking, however.

 

[Jessica Booker]

That all makes sense - thank you. I worry about bothering graduate recruitment. Also the perception of making excuses. Maybe this is just overthinking, however.

It is your responsibility to request the adjustment and clearly explaining the need for the adjustment.

It’s the employer/recruiter’s responsibility to determine whether that adjustment is reasonable.

You are not bothering graduated recruitment - this is part of their job and it is their legal responsibility to ensure reasonable adjustments are considered and applied.

If they don’t do that, they are at significant risk of the claims like the BT one.