Interested in responses to this. I have autism which I think means the WG is almost impossible for me to do very well in, cf. Arctic Shores. I wonder if a firm may be inclined to look for other reasons to reject you if you rely on mitigating circumstances. The reason I don’t use them is because I worry that you may be seen as someone who makes excuses and might be a liability to the firm. I’d like to know how much neurodiversity there is at Trainee, Associate and Partnership level. I get attitudes and policies towards this stuff was different when the current Partners were trainees or articled clerks or whatever, but I worry it counts against you.