How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register HereIt is unlikely that a firm can accommodate this. They very much frown upon people applying to a regional office believing it to be an easier application route to try to switch to London once an offer is through.I want to change the location of my training contract to London. What could be a good reason?
I don’t think firms will accommodate this whatever may be the reasonI want to change the location of my training contract to London. What could be a good reason?
Feel free to PM me about this. I'd stress most won't move you, either because it is a standard policy not too (too many people have tried this before) or because they won't have a vacancy for you to move into.I want to change the location of my training contract to London. What could be a good reason?
“Assessment centres are planned to run in March/April 2025, with final panel interviews planned for April/May 2025.” We should hear from them soon.Anyone heard from K&S?
Thank you!I don’t think they’ll tell you. It could change last minute too. So probably not worth telling people.
They said a couplehas anybody heard back from CRS post VI for the direct TC yet? I received a mail yest from them saying they are reviewing the vi now for dtc
Funnily enough it tends to be the opposite, such as for example with Hogan Lovells' 40 TC places, 38 go to London and 2 to BirminghamIt is unlikely that a firm can accommodate this. They very much frown upon people applying to a regional office believing it to be an easier application route to try to switch to London once an offer is through.
I think you have missed my point. Those London places will have always been London places.Funnily enough it tends to be the opposite, such as for example with Hogan Lovells' 40 TC places, 38 go to London and 2 to Birmingham
I don't think HL London gets 19 times more applicants though.I think you have missed my point. Those London places will have always been London places.
Yes I think candidates mistakenly think it may be easier and on occasion it may be because there may indeed be fewer better candidates applying depending which office. Also I know some regional firms look for ties to that region as part of their criteria when assessing applications. This is because they dont want people to train with them and then go off elsewhere as soon as they qualify having invested heavily in them. This was explained to me by a partner at a regional firm I did an insight week at. So having been accepted because of having ties to the region then asking to be switched after TC offer to London which would have different salary, and maintenance grants etc it would not be considered by that firm and he said by most firms.I don't think HL London gets 19 times more applicants though.
I meant the opposite with regards to it being harder not easier to go for regional offices.