TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

addy2004

Valued Member
Premium Member
  • Nov 28, 2023
    119
    234
    they say they're running multiple assessment days through January and February, and I'm aware there is a precedent where they reconsider people who apply for Winter and spring for summer. Since they haven't sent out Summer invites yet, you could very well be getting considered for Summer.

    I even know people who received PFOs for Winter and then were subsequently reconsidered [without being asked] for Spring.
    So people who were rejected for the Linklaters winter vac scheme have previously been offered ACs for other schemes do you mean?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: tisha.patel_

    chrisbrown

    Distinguished Member
    Jul 4, 2024
    56
    56
    Is it worth applying to W&Cs vac scheme today? As deadline is on the 12th. I'm in full-time work in a legal role so would saving it for direct TC be better?
    If you can write a strong application in the time frame you have left I would go for it! 🙂🙂

    Firms like DLA Piper take rolling recruitment on a much more serious level and will close applications once they receive enough applications - W&C review applications on a rolling basis but don’t make decisions until after the final deadline (which is tomorrow).

    Most people send applications in within the final week of the deadline - law firms will want the best talent so won’t reject an application purely because it was sent in close to the final deadline. If it’s a good application and shows potential they will consider it! 🙂🙂

    I sent my W&C application on Sunday last week so 7 days before the final deadline!
     

    chrisbrown

    Distinguished Member
    Jul 4, 2024
    56
    56
    Hey @KBanana and @chrisbrown ,

    For the first question, I would say there’s no right or wrong answer. The firm seemingly wants to simply gauge your creativity and your thought process behind this and why. Now there is also no need to do the following, but I would personally focus on an invention in the legal field - not because this is what you need to focus on to get the question right, but because this is an area I am drawn to. Find an area that interests you as then you’d be able to talk about it in depth. It’s also not enough to just answer the question directly because despite it not specifying this, you will need to focus on why the invention is a good one. For example, how does it benefit the industry or a process that is not as easy given existing tech capabilities? This will take your answer to the next level in terms of specificity.

    For the second question, I would say grammarly is a good one provided you go into detail on how it was employed specifically.

    Also, I can’t keep calm Chris Brown is literally on our forum 😱🥰🔥🥹🚀
    Thank you so much @Amma Usman!!

    This is really useful and makes the question seem a lot less complicated. 🙂🙂

    Yes, Chris Brown has made it on to the TCLA Forum!!

    🚀😱😎🔥
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    • Haha
    Reactions: Uch21 and Chouette

    desperateTCseeker1998

    Legendary Member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Jan 1, 2023
    310
    267
    For Squire Patton Boggs, it gives you 6 entries for work experience which are 150 words each and then a 750 word box for any other work experience you've done. 150 words is so little (especially if you don't want to write in bullet points) and I have 10 work experiences which I usually include so I was thinking of maybe using the 750 words for my most important work experiences (eg my legal experience + grad jobs) and then the 150 word boxes for my less relevant work experience (eg barista) which I mainly include to demonstrate that I've worked in a variety of different roles since I was a young teenager. However, I'm worried that this might not be the best approach as the main boxes might be the more obvious place to put my important/recent/relevant work experiences and I don't know how it all shows up on grad rec's side of the system? Any advice anyone? In particular would love your advice @Jessica Booker
     
    • 🤝
    Reactions: chrisbrown

    suhana

    Star Member
    Mar 17, 2024
    40
    21
    Hey @suhana ,

    I have linked a couple of helpful resources by the team below;





    Best of luck! You’ll do amazing!
    Thank you so much! This is incredibly helpful. However, I just reviewed the PE case study, and I noticed that I cannot see any responses to your message after you posted the case study. Specifically, I’m unable to access the discussion thread and YOUR response to the case study Is there any way I could access this discussion now, or is it no longer available?
     

    Amma Usman

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Future Trainee
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Sep 7, 2024
    653
    593
    Thank you so much! This is incredibly helpful. However, I just reviewed the PE case study, and I noticed that I cannot see any responses to your message after you posted the case study. Specifically, I’m unable to access the discussion thread and YOUR response to the case study Is there any way I could access this discussion now, or is it no longer available?
    No worries @suhana , I will post my responses shortly!
     

    Amma Usman

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Future Trainee
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Sep 7, 2024
    653
    593
    Regarding the Forster’s feedback, what is meant when they say they like a legal element to be discussed? Is this like a specific case?

    Hey @tarty23 ,

    I’ve just seen the post and quoted the section below for more context;

    “ Options picked considered too safe: many candidates avoided talking about clients, cases, lawyers and departments. In summary, they avoided talking about anything legal. We want to know which areas are of interest to you, and be able to see you have researched them thoroughly. We would advise you aim for a legal element, as well as talking about the easier elements to talk about, such as values, culture, D&I and CSR (which required less research) “

    From what I have gathered, may candidates did not talk about the legal side of the profession. In other words, what drives you about business law? The reasons must be highly specific. Law firms want to see that candidates are generally and genuinely interested in their work. You could touch on this in a variety of ways, and the points the firm has mentioned show the most specific interest, when backed up by your own life and professional experiences. Overall, the legal element encompasses factors such as practice area awareness and interests. Which practices appeal to you and why? Are they core focuses at the firm to even begin with? Have you spoken to any lawyers at the firm who have given you more insight into the work and values of the firm? Why did you find that enlightening and which aspect of your past experiences can you link to back up that interest? The latter part on linking is very important because when someone tells one about the values or work of a firm, one shouldn’t immediately use that as a rationale for wanting to train there - indeed, any candidate can do this. The connection needs to be made to you personally, to show individuality. I appreciate this is a difficult connection to make at first, and it certainly was for me. I took some time to understand my drivers, motivations, and areas of interest. This enabled me to seamlessly make such connections on practices/values to my own self.

    On your second question, a case can be added to highlight and further emphasise your passion for a specific practice. However, ensure to not just drop it since many firms work on similar deals. Was there anything landmark about that particular deal? Did it change or introduce something new in the industry? Are there specific factors about it that seamlessly link to an interest or experience of yours, that may not necessarily be seen among other firms?

    In summary, I would personally interpret the firm’s inclusion of the word safe, as lacking specificity on practices of interest. To help me develop this skill during my cycle, I had literally gotten a big cardboard and written out all my interests/experiences that I could think of. I then researched on firms based off all the info on the cardboard, frequently referring to it during applications and interviews.

    Best of luck! Hope this helps.
     

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.