any1 still waiting on WC WVS?
yep, still waiting. not to be pessimistic but the scheme starts so soon that I think that i should jsut take it as a reectionany1 still waiting on WC WVS?
lowkey feel the same way- if they are considering us for spring idk why they haven't told usyep, still waiting. not to be pessimistic but the scheme starts so soon that I think that i should jsut take it as a reection
Hi yes, I was genuinely heartbroken in tears when I received the rejection last night.has anyone who did the written test for dechert closer to the end of oct / start of November heard back yet?
Im so sorry to hear thatHi yes, I was genuinely heartbroken in tears when I received the rejection last night.
someone on the forum who did the a/c on 11 Nov received an offer last week, i did mine way earlier so i don't think they're considering me for any other schemes as winter clearly hadn't filled up yet. i guess just time to move on as annoying as it islowkey feel the same way- if they are considering us for spring idk why they haven't told us![]()
Nope, no feedback either but I reckon they have spaces because they are still inviting people for interviewsIm so sorry to hear that– keep going, you're one yes away!!
Im wondering if the scheme is full or somethingdid they mention anything?
Ah I'm so sorry to hear this! Stay strong, and think do you really want to work for a firm that leaves you on tender hooks for 5 weeks!Hi yes, I was genuinely heartbroken in tears when I received the rejection last night.
lol I still want them, even if they don't want me 🤣🤣 Icl my spring applications need to come throughAh I'm so sorry to hear this! Stay strong, and think do you really want to work for a firm that leaves you on tender hooks for 5 weeks!
this is so valid!!lol I still want them, even if they don't want me 🤣🤣 Icl my spring applications need to come through
girl that is a situationship you can do better you dont chase you attractlol I still want them, even if they don't want me 🤣🤣 Icl my spring applications need to come through
I think Conclusion Follows; Conclusion Follows; Conclusion Does Not Follow; Conclusion Does Not Follow. What's the answer?Sorry can someone help me answer these - i have got most wrong on this one.
All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service. No normal pupil is intelligent. Therefore: Proposed Conclusions:
No member of a diplomatic service is a normal pupil.
Every intelligent pupil takes an active role in the service.
The normal pupil cannot be an active member of a diplomatic service.
Some members of a diplomatic service are abnormal pupils.
I am far from a Watson Glaser professional but I shall share my two pence (partly as practice!)Sorry can someone help me answer these - i have got most wrong on this one.
All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service. No normal pupil is intelligent. Therefore: Proposed Conclusions:
No member of a diplomatic service is a normal pupil.
Every intelligent pupil takes an active role in the service.
The normal pupil cannot be an active member of a diplomatic service.
Some members of a diplomatic service are abnormal pupils.
When approaching the statements, I like to start by (1.) doing a venn diagram and/or (2.) taking the contrapositive.All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service. No normal pupil is intelligent. Therefore:
With this statement, you learn two things: (1.) there's a class (aka group) of people called 'members of a diplomatic service'. (2.) all intelligent pupils are part of that class. This is a good statement to do a venn diagram for - big circle is the class - 'members of a diplomatic service'; within this circle, draw a circle to represent members - 'all intelligent pupils'.Statement 1: All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service.
With this, I like taking the contrapositive - this is a fancy way of flipping the statement back-to-front, then negating whatever was positive and vice-versa. It's a good thing to do - I definitely encourage having a look into it if you haven't. The contrapositive would be - "All intelligent pupils are not normal pupils". This is your learning number three.Statement 2: No normal pupil is intelligent.
what section was this for - deductions or interpretation?Sorry can someone help me answer these - i have got most wrong on this one.
All intelligent pupils are members of a diplomatic service. No normal pupil is intelligent. Therefore: Proposed Conclusions:
No member of a diplomatic service is a normal pupil.
Every intelligent pupil takes an active role in the service.
The normal pupil cannot be an active member of a diplomatic service.
Some members of a diplomatic service are abnormal pupils.