• Are you a future trainee?

    We're hiring at TCLA. Apply by midnight on 25 February 2025.

    Apply Now

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

wqueens8

Star Member
Jun 28, 2024
47
61
I have got some uni grades back today - what is the done thing in terms of updating applications? I am still waiting on updates for some and wondering if it's useful to let grad rec know?
I could be wrong but I think generally it's not necessary. Just at the point of any application you tell them what you have achieved at that point. Upon any kind of offer they may ask you to update them, but even then it would usually be upon a TC offer at the end of a vac scheme, rather than a vac scheme offer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluescarf
My friend SAR’d them post-AC, as you can’t re-apply anyway. Comments were v insightful they just cba to give honest feedback aha
😂😂 I would do the same tbh. Not providing feedback is absurd and cruel. Apart from the lack of transparency, people spend so much time on those applications only to be unceremoniously rejected without any feedback. I won’t waste my time applying. Same for those firms with silly tests like NRF, MB, RS that make people jump through hoops for low pay just to work equally as hard as the higher paying US firms for pay that pretty much ensures that you’re working for less than minimum wage and cannot get on the housing ladder or afford to live anywhere inside zone 4. Hard pass!
 
Last edited:

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
578
988
Hi @Andrei Radu @Amma Usman @Jessica Booker @anyone else (sorry if you're not supposed to tag multiple Forum helpers),

I recently received feedback from LL post-AC. Please can you advise on how you would implement the following advice, based on your experiences? It was explained clearly but as a non-law student from a first-generation background, I want to check that I'm not missing anything 😅

For context, there was a HR competency-based interview and a technical interview with Partners. I didn't perform quite well enough in either of them to progress.

1. Succinctness - an issue in both. In the Hr interview, I used the STAR technique but gave too much backstory and the interviewer didn't have enough time/was unable to ask follow up questions and build a rapport. The content itself was strong though and they could tell I prepared/put effort in.
2. Technical interview - evidence of ability to interpret (the legal points) of a term sheet - there were points I didn't pick up on/this was the weaker point even though I had high-level commercial thinking. This is what I REALLY am unsure of how to develop as a non-law student - beyond the (v helpful) case studies the TCLA subscription provides, what else would you advise?
3. Building a rapport - honestly I am such an introverted person (and I think I may be a masking autistic!) but feedback emphasised that they could see I was nervous but wanted a genuine conversation with me.

Honestly that's all there is, I'm still a bit confused on what else to do, because nothing explicit on my answers to motivational questions was given or how well I did do at picking up legal concepts, just that it wasn't good enough. Is it worth messaging them again to ask or should I not?

LL was really nice though in terms of the feedback
Hi @floral.tcla I will first of all say that you are definitely taking the right approach in asking for and reflecting on feedback. I know how disappointing a post-AC rejection can feel, and showing this attitude in the face of it is no small feat. My advice on how to act on the feedback is the following:

1. For succinctness: I think you should avoid the trap of thinking that every single experience you reference has to be explained in a fully-fledged STAR-structured manner. For some important experiences that may be the case. But if you reference three or four different experiences in one answer, you can see how this could lead to both an information overload and an inefficient use of your airtime. To improve on this front, I would advise you to practice reformulating answers to fit different time limits. For instance, say you have a 'Tell me about a time you demonstrated teamwork skills' answer that normally takes you around 3 minutes; the, practice trying to formulate a 2 minute and 1 minute version of that answer. This will teach you to discern essential from non-essential information and express yourself more concisely when you need to. In order to judge whether there is a need for you to reduce the length of your answers in the interview, try to both ask yourself: (i) how is the interviewer responding to my answers, do they seem to be engaged throughout, or do they seem to become impatient after a given point?; and (ii) how much of the important ground has been covered up to this point, and how much time is there left to be asked other questions?

2. For technical exercises: in my opinion basic legal knowledge is definitely an advantage. What I would advise you to do is the following: (i) try to research and understand some basic concepts in contract law (offer/acceptance, consideration, frustration, etc); (ii) research the most important terms that go into an M&A transaction (warranties and indemnities, conditions precedent, disclosure schedules, NDAs, governing law clauses etc); and (iii) take a look at and practice trying to spell out the meaning of provisions from documents such as SPAs and Equity Term Sheets.

3. For building rapport: I can definitely empathize with your difficulties in building rapport with someone you have never met before and in a circumstance as stressful as an AC. However, I think this is also a skill you can work on. Of course, different people will have different inclinations and talents, and some find it easier than others to navigate new types of social situations; but this equally applies to any other ability. I am also a quite introverted person by nature and I never particularly enjoyed the dynamics of trying to build a connection with lawyers in a networking context. Nonetheless, I recognized this as something I could become better at. As such, I put myself in as many such situations as I could at firm events and did my best to learn from people who I saw were able to do this with more ease. As time passed and to a great extent without me even realizing it, I found I had become a lot better at it.
 
  • 🤝
  • ℹ️
Reactions: floral.tcla and Chris Brown

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.