TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

[VacSchemer]

Hi - has anyone heard with AC invites from Travers Smith for the vacation schemes?

They are already done with partner interviews? Omg

 

[Chris Brown]

Hi - has anyone heard with AC invites from Travers Smith for the vacation schemes?

I’ve seen around 3 people on this forum with partner interview invites so far. The AC itself takes place during the VS I think. People that pass the partner interview get SVS offers.​

 

[di]

anyone heard from Mishcon re Spring scheme yet?

 

[DolphinShades44]

Hi - has anyone heard with AC invites from Travers Smith for the vacation schemes?

Hi, I did my interview this week. I got the feeling it's very much still ongoing 🙏🏼

 

[abbiewhitlock03]

Any thoughts on acceptable practices for online tests, from the point of view of academic honesty?

I did a 'virtual' AC, which I felt was slightly poorly managed. There were two prior rounds: the form, then a proof-reading task using skillsarena, which had video proctoring activated.

The AC consisted of a group exercise, which makes sense, followed by what turned out to be another written task via skillsarena with video proctoring. It wasn't really clear why this second task was considered part of the AC, because the schedule read:

1. 11:10-11:40 - written exercise; zoom link provided
2. 11:40-12:00 - written exercise; zoom link provided

whereas in fact what happened was they sent out the skillsarena link at 11:02am, and then between about 11:10 and 11:15 were explaining that we'd need to log off zoom (because the skillsarena task is video-proctored), do the task, then rejoin afterwards. Since the allocated time within skillsarena was 30 minutes, it was quite disconcerting as the schedule implied that you were expected to rejoin at 11:40, whereas you probably wouldn't even have started your task until about 11:18, and only at that point would have learned that you had been allocated 30 minutes to complete the task. (As it turned out, when I joined the 11:40-12:00 session, it was just a "thanks for coming", and the entire second hour of the AC could just have been done offline.)

The fact that video proctoring is activated by skillsarena suggests that they are trying to stop cheating, but they don't define what cheating is.

One candidate asked "can we use Microsoft Word?" (it was a drafting exercise, and a formatted box was provided to reply within skillsarena)

In my opinion the answer to this should be "no", unless you've got a dispensation or something, because Word will identify grammar and spelling errors, and now has AI features as well that could generate the entire email.

However, the answer was given "yes".

I did not use Microsoft Word, out of an abundance of caution, and also did not use the full 30 minutes because I was concerned about being late back, even though this turned out not to be an issue. I did however ctrl+c my answer and checked it in Word AFTER submission, where it spotted a typo, and suggested a couple of missing commas.

It turned out that although you could copy out, Skillsarena disabled paste into the box, and two or three candidates were unable to submit because they had done their answers in Word and then copy + pasted them at 29:30, and then found out that it didn't work. So they had to email them manually, lol.

I've noticed in other online tests that they say they have "behind the scenes metrics". It's not clear what this means, but technologically apps can detect when you switch to other windows, and can also detect copy pasting (although often this is disabled), track response times. In SJTs where they have numerical questions I would tend to use Excel unless it's trivially simple to do by mental arithmetic, because that just seems like the only sensible way to do things, but it's not really clear whether Excel use is somehow frowned upon.

In addition, AI can accurately answer many types of question, and while this is presumably deemed cheating, it's not necessarily spelled out, nor do they typically make even minimal efforts to stop this (e.g., by using a locked-down exambrowser-type tool). (Although I suppose such efforts might be deemed OTT in that these are not exams but merely one of several stages in a recruitment process).

Hi - I think we must’ve been in the same AC group as I had the exact same experience in a virtual AC at the beginning of this week, with the same issue of people writing it on word and being unable to paste it back into skillsarena. I’m glad grad rec said they could email it, though, as the candidates seemed kinda stressed out and I felt so bad.

I did find it a little strange that we weren’t required to be on the zoom call for the written task, and that the timings didn’t match up with the final call. I was slightly panicked when I saw that the task was thirty minutes but we didn’t get to start it until 11:20 ish (which made us late for the final call) - though eventually the final call finished before the allocated time anyway.

 

[Jessica Booker]

Hi - I think we must’ve been in the same AC group as I had the exact same experience in a virtual AC at the beginning of this week, with the same issue of people writing it on word and being unable to paste it back into skillsarena. I’m glad grad rec said they could email it, though, as the candidates seemed kinda stressed out and I felt so bad.

I did find it a little strange that we weren’t required to be on the zoom call for the written task, and that the timings didn’t match up with the final call. I was slightly panicked when I saw that the task was thirty minutes but we didn’t get to start it until 11:20 ish (which made us late for the final call) - though eventually the final call finished before the allocated time anyway.

Assessment centres are notorious for not running to time. With every intention and amazing planning in the world, they so easily fall behind schedule.

I wouldn’t worry too much about when your exercises started - it’s just about getting the amount of time for exercises like written assessments/case study prep etc.

 

[adrian_nlh]

They are already done with partner interviews? Omg

No, they're still doing them. Travers gives VS AC invites mid-Feb to early March so don't panic until then.

 

[abbiewhitlock03]

Assessment centres are notorious for not running to time. With every intention and amazing planning in the world, they so easily fall behind schedule.

I wouldn’t worry too much about when your exercises started - it’s just about getting the amount of time for exercises like written assessments/case study prep etc.

That is reassuring - thank you! The graduate recruitment team didn't seem too worried about it at the time, I was just initially a little panicked 😅

 

[manifestingthetc]

Anyone else hear back from Greenberg?

For those who have heard back, is this in relation to interviews? or PFO? 😅

 

[Paul Jules Steullet]

HFW PFO Weil Offer

 

[e1996]

anything from mishcon post ac? spring

Nothing yet - have you?

 

[yuk0n]

For those who have heard back, is this in relation to interviews? or PFO? 😅

I was invited for an interview.

 

[fairbourne]

Greenberg Traurig TC Interview! Does anyone have any insights? Thanks very much in advance

 

[👩🎓]

Should we assume a rejection from PMC if we haven't heard back yet?

 

[lolololol]

is the virtual ac the last stage for wfw or is there an in person interview for the vs?

 

[trainee4u]

Assessment centres are notorious for not running to time. With every intention and amazing planning in the world, they so easily fall behind schedule.

I wouldn’t worry too much about when your exercises started - it’s just about getting the amount of time for exercises like written assessments/case study prep etc.

They sent a table which was a Word document that consisted of a table with five rows (plus header):

<Time><Activity><Zoom link>
<10-10:15><Introduction><link>
<10:15-11:00><Group Exercise><link>
<11:00-11:10><Break>
<11:10-11:40><Written exercise><link>
<11:40-12:00><Written exercise><link>

(there was no other text except for the names of the staff leading the sessions)

Whereas they should have combined the last two rows into one
<11:10-12:00><Written exercise><link>

and provided further clarification:

"You will be sent a link to a skillsarena task on the day, which you will have 30 minutes to complete. You should join the zoom session before starting the task, then leave it to do the task, then rejoin again after you have completed it. "

As it was the fact that a 11:40 start time was given for the apparent second 'written exercise' zoom meeting, led to an expectation (by me!) that you would need to be back there at that time, or at least not be too late, because it was listed as a separate item labelled "written exercise"

 

[👩🎓]

Has anyone heard from Hill Dickinson or know when candidates will hear back?

 

[billyonthespeeddial]

Has anyone heard from Hill Dickinson or know when candidates will hear back?

Every time I see this firm's name I assume for a split second that people mean Harris Dickinson

 

[abbiewhitlock03]

They sent a table which was a Word document that consisted of a table with five rows (plus header):

<Time><Activity><Zoom link>
<10-10:15><Introduction><link>
<10:15-11:00><Group Exercise><link>
<11:00-11:10><Break>
<11:10-11:40><Written exercise><link>
<11:40-12:00><Written exercise><link>

(there was no other text except for the names of the staff leading the sessions)

Whereas they should have combined the last two rows into one
<11:10-12:00><Written exercise><link>

and provided further clarification:

"You will be sent a link to a skillsarena task on the day, which you will have 30 minutes to complete. You should join the zoom session before starting the task, then leave it to do the task, then rejoin again after you have completed it. "

As it was the fact that a 11:40 start time was given for the apparent second 'written exercise' zoom meeting, led to an expectation (by me!) that you would need to be back there at that time, or at least not be too late, because it was listed as a separate item labelled "written exercise"

That's odd - my timetable looked the same, but stated 'Wrap up and Final Questions' in the 11:40 - 12:00 slot, so maybe there was a typo in the timetable sent to your group?

 

[bluescarf]

Has anyone heard from Hill Dickinson or know when candidates will hear back?

No but last year the deadline was the same and first responses came through start of March