Question for anyone who has been to an AC/VS who is not a second year uni student:
Have you ever been questioned by fellow applicants about your age/the fact that you're 'older'/'later in progress' than they are?
My reason for asking is that I had an experience where my peers (all in their second year of uni + i was passed that) were bewildered by my age etc. It was quite tricky fending off questions about why I was 'still' applying/hadn't had any success. It was obviously quite demoralising for myself to handle but I pulled through.
Perhaps it was just that they happened to be young and innocent - unaware of the reality that many people don't get VS/TCs in their second year. However, I'm worried that since I'll be adding yet another year on by next cycle, such experiences will only get worse.
Hoping for some reassurance/anecdotes about how my bad experience was an anomaly 😅
Thanks guys
Some younger people straight from school can be surprised when meeting someone of a different age alongside them for the first time. Most know it's to be expected at this stage and might just be making conversation, but a few might not know how to react and end up being awkward about it. I've never met anyone who was malicious about it, though! I'm sorry you had an unpleasant time. By a strange turn of events, I started undergrad several years 'late' and am still in the application trenches, so get what you're talking about. I can still hear it now... "oh my god, you're 90s kid"... yes, Sienna 💀
Try to not let it get to you. You already know trainee ages vary, particularly at firms with lean teams or industry expertise. If anything, I think it gets easier, in the sense that you're a distinctly wiser person alongside other applicants and when speaking with senior lawyers. That's worth a lot. Gotta get that fully developed prefrontal cortex, right