How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register Herehas any1 heard back post app for Summer Vs for any of these firms?
Russell Cooke, Arnold and Porter, MoFo, Katten, Wedlake Bell, Winston and Strawn, Bevan Britain, Hill Dickinson, Curtis ?
One of two approach - chase Slaughters for a decision on Monday or accept HSF with the view that you could renege on them at a later date if you were offered Slaughters and decided to go with them over HSF.
I haven't seen anyone post about Hill Dickinson test invites across this thread or DTC thread, do you mind sharing where you saw this?I have seen some people get interview invites for MoFo and I think I saw test invites for Hill Dickinson but I can’t remember if those were for DTC or VS. 🙂
Orrick, V&E, probs a few others. Basically that ones that use BARBRIHello everyone.
I am currently getting ready to make applications for direct training contracts.
I am graduated with an LLB from a Dutch university where we did a comparative study between EU law jurisdictions and England & Wales, and finished my LLM in London this year.
I know the PGDL is not a regulatory requirement anymore if you have an LLB, however, some firms still require people to do the PGDL if they didn't do an LLB in the UK.
Does anyone know of any firms that don't require the PGDL if one has the LLB? I don't want to waste one year doing the PGDL and it'll help me prioritise certain firms. I am aware Baker Mckenzie has such an arrangement, but I'm unsure about any other firms.
Does anyone have any insights? Thanks![]()
We will all find out at the same time and by no later than 7 pm on 26th.Has anyone heard back from Willkie post written exercise?
Thanks Ricky!We will all find out at the same time and by no later than 7 pm on 26th.
Hello everyone.
I am currently getting ready to make applications for direct training contracts.
I am graduated with an LLB from a Dutch university where we did a comparative study between EU law jurisdictions and England & Wales, and finished my LLM in London this year.
I know the PGDL is not a regulatory requirement anymore if you have an LLB, however, some firms still require people to do the PGDL if they didn't do an LLB in the UK.
Does anyone know of any firms that don't require the PGDL if one has the LLB? I don't want to waste one year doing the PGDL and it'll help me prioritise certain firms. I am aware Baker Mckenzie has such an arrangement, but I'm unsure about any other firms.
Does anyone have any insights? Thanks![]()
I haven't seen anyone post about Hill Dickinson test invites across this thread or DTC thread, do you mind sharing where you saw this?
Yes - it is not an issue to explain which firm it is with.Slaughters asked which firm gave me the VS offer. I've never dealt with a situation like this - is it okay/safe to simply tell them?
I would not expect it to. Firstly, because firms in general, but in particular American firms, have a clear preference for recruiting candidates that they can observe and test in the office. In fact, as far as I am aware, the only route available to enter biglaw in the US is the summer associate one. While US firms will give out a few TCs to people who apply via the direct route so as not to miss out great candidates who have more substantial legal work experience, they do not significantly alter the number of TCs available from the VS route. Doing so would mean missing out on a comparatively larger talent pool.Hi @Andrei Radu
Quick question- I’ve got a summer vac scheme with GD, but have seen that a few people on LinkedIn who applied for direct tcs have received offers already. Knowing that the firm recruits such a few number of trainees, will these direct tcs impact the number of trainees taken from the vac scheme?
Okay thank goodness, I started panicking for a second 😭I may or may not have accidentally mixed up Hill Dickinson and Womble Bond Dickinson… 💀
I think from last year’s forum, people were getting test invites for Hill Dickinson from the 1st of March onwards. Best of luck! 🙂
They sent us an email to send things to them with a deadline for today. If you’re on later scheme maybe urs will follow shortly.For those who've gotten Skadden, could I check if we are still waiting for updates on their side to submit the DBS documents?
I would generally recommend talking about clients broadly rather than a specific sub-group/industry where you can. I would consider broader economic, political, social and regulatory changes or trends that are happening that would impact a broad of clients across industries/sectors.Hi everyone,
I've never answered a question like this before (first proper cycle), and so I'm unsure what sort of discussion points I need to be hitting for this and just wanted some advice.
The question is asking 'What do you think are the biggest challenges facing the firms clients at the moment'.
If I want to speak about the agricultural sector for example, would I be okay to talk about how (according to an article from the FT) the UK lacks coherent rural policy? What sort of things would I need to talk about within that?
Any guidance would be really appreciated