Most city firms assumed the SQE was a replacement to the LPC but it was actually a replacement for the TC - it certainly does seem that firms still favour the traditional TC route. Future trainees sit the SQE exams before they start their TC. 🥲🥲Are there any downsides of taking this route (other than having to self-fund the SQE)? For example, does taking this path affect your chances of being hired as an NQ at elite firms?
If I'm not mistaken - it seems many firms still favour the traditional training contract structure, so I’d like to understand if this route could create any disadvantages when it comes to securing competitive roles.
However, given most firms are increasingly committed to diversifying access to the legal profession, I wouldn’t think there are significant downsides if someone chose this path to qualifying, then apply for an NQ position at an elite law firm. 🙂🙂
I think it depends on a lot of factors though. As the SQE + QWE route is fairly new, it still has a lot of uncertainty around it. I think @Jessica Booker might have a better answer to give for this question tbh. I also think @Ram Sabaratnam, @Andrei Radu and @Amma Usman can provide much better insight. 🙂🙂
Last edited: