Hoping for a christmas miracle next week 🙏
With you on this - if a firm has bs questions they’ll elicit bs answers and I’ve got better things to do with my time 😂My cue to not apply there cause I REFUSE to answer questions like this omg
In their open day today they implied a few blips are fine and a 2.1 overall is fine. They also said they would treat every mark as equal regardless of the university they were achieved at (which I don't consider equitable tbh but fair enough). One post above said they looked up the current associates and they all had 1sts, but this could just be a correlation with the kind of candidate they accepted at lateral level. Since this is their first admissions year we really don't know how much weight they'll place on academics. I think if your profile is strong in other areas it's definitely still worth applying. They didn't seem as strict as for example a Slaughter & May.I have a question and would greatly appreciate your guidance as I am feeling quite unsure. I was considering applying to Paul, Weiss, but after reading some forum messages, I understand the firm places a significant emphasis on high academic marks, likely expecting a strong record of firsts and 2:1s. In my case, I have one first, several 2:1s, and a few 2:2s, and I completed my undergraduate degree outside the UK. Given these circumstances, would it still be worth applying to Paul, Weiss? I want to be realistic and avoid spending time if the firm mostly seeks candidates with consistently high grades or exceptional achievements.
Thank you so much! I guess I will try.In their open day today they implied a few blips are fine and a 2.1 overall is fine. They also said they would treat every mark as equal regardless of the university they were achieved at (which I don't consider equitable tbh but fair enough). One post above said they looked up the current associates and they all had 1sts, but this could just be a correlation with the kind of candidate they accepted at lateral level. Since this is their first admissions year we really don't know how much weight they'll place on academics. I think if your profile is strong in other areas it's definitely still worth applying. They didn't seem as strict as for example a Slaughter & May.
For everyone else applying, another tidbit from the open day: the first stage is a spelling check of the whole application. So basically don't make a mistake or the application won't be read.
I got some 2:2s and applied. If you like them, do it. Grades aren't everything to a firm. What do you have to lose? My degree marks didn't matter elsewhere. Latham, W&C and Ropes ACs previously. More things to life than grades. Commercial awareness is also very important. It's also about getting experience, honestly. This gets easier with time, obviously. Many grade questions on this forum. It's understandable, but don't overthink them. Focus on areas where you're strong.I have a question and would greatly appreciate your guidance as I am feeling quite unsure. I was considering applying to Paul, Weiss, but after reading some forum messages, I understand the firm places a significant emphasis on high academic marks, likely expecting a strong record of firsts and 2:1s. In my case, I have one first, several 2:1s, and a few 2:2s, and I completed my undergraduate degree outside the UK. Given these circumstances, would it still be worth applying to Paul, Weiss? I want to be realistic and avoid spending time if the firm mostly seeks candidates with consistently high grades or exceptional achievements.
If my Lego mini figures came to life, I'd probably just call up Warner Bros and say that I'm making a Lego Movie 3 with half the budget. The only advice I'd give to my minifigure is to invest their earnings from being a movie star 🤣Any thoughts on how to tackle these questions from Withers and Penningtons Manches Cooper respectively?
1. If your favourite childhood toy suddenly came to life, what advice would you give it today? (60 words)
2. If you were the CEO of Penningtons Manches Cooper, where would you look to open a new office and why? (250 words)
Thanks!
Hello, is there a question bank anywhere for strength and competency questions for ACs?
@Amma Usman @Andrei Radu @Ram Sabaratnam I would be super grateful if you could give insights into what types of questions and what essential points a good answer would contain to do well in an AC Thank you very much!
@Andrei Radu @Amma Usman
Do you think a 2021 deal is too old to mention, even if its exactly the type of work you want to do and there's no more recent examples on the firm's website?
Thanks a lot!
For this question: What are your motivations for wanting to pursue a career as a Solicitor at DWF? (250 words)
Do I need to split my answer equally between why commercial law and then why DWF? Or say why DWF only? Any help is appreciated!
Could I ask when you received the benchmark passed email? Was it a separate email to your feedback report? Thanks!Yes they said I passed their benchmark + I had also attended one of their Open Days
Hey @mulan0 ,
The way I see it, it’s a hybrid question asking for ‘why commercial law’ and why DWF’. I noticed this because of the inclusion of the word solicitor. I think the even split is a good idea, but you don’t have to strictly follow that approach. I will personally split the question into two paragraphs, covering each question in one paragraph. You may find that you will have less to say on why CL. Now, this will allow you to focus more on why DWF so you can actually touch more on their practices that appeal to you - and why. This should not come at the expense of fully explaining why CL though. If you can cover that in a few sentences and hit the nail on the head with that, then there is no disputing that you would have had a solid answer to that.
Best wishes with the application!
Thank you guys that’s really helpful!☺️I would interpret this as 'Why the firm', in which case I would do 3 paragraphs: 1. the work (most important thing-maybe practice area ur interested in bolstered by rankings on Chambers- their rankings are not great), 2. the culture (whether small trainee intake, early responsibility etc.), 3. pro bono work they have done and/ OR diversity and inclusion; however, given they have no direct question on the app about 'why commercial law', you could open with "I’m keen to become a commercial solicitor due to the unique blend of legal and business advice that characterises commercial law........(one sentence). I am interested in DWF primarily because of its London-based top-tier Banking & Finance practice.....250 words is not a lot, so use your judgment. Good luck!
The feedback report and benchmark passed emails are seperate and I got the one saying I passed 2 days after I completed the test.Could I ask when you received the benchmark passed email? Was it a separate email to your feedback report? Thanks!