Well done! Do you mind me asking when you applied?CRS VI!!
If anyone has any experience with this or tips on how to prepare please could you let me know as CRS is one of my top firms!! Thanks
Well done! Do you mind me asking when you applied?CRS VI!!
If anyone has any experience with this or tips on how to prepare please could you let me know as CRS is one of my top firms!! Thanks
If you meant TI, then i was told they are running them until the 21st Feb so we wont hear back until after thenPeople that have had a TI with NRF in the last 2 weeks, have you heard back?
For spring they took around 3 weeks to get back to mePeople that have had a TI with NRF in the last 2 weeks, have you heard back?
Yeah, I did, I just edited the post. Ok thanks - saw that other people were getting ACs and didn't know what to assumeIf you meant TI, then i was told they are running them until the 21st Feb so we wont hear back until after then
The chances are going to be so varied based on individual circumstances at that time. A good chance with the firm in the previous cycle doesn’t necessarily mean it will be a good chance this cycle.Just got Debevoise Waitlist (idk how to feel). Does anyone with previous experience have any idea what the chances of being bumped to attending the open day from the waitlist are?
Is this for summer?If you meant TI, then i was told they are running them until the 21st Feb so we wont hear back until after then
Hey! Any clue whether Spring ACs and TIs are all over? I've been ghosted since my WGFor spring they took around 3 weeks to get back to me
I was told by grad rec that the AC on the 8th was the last one for SpringHey! Any clue whether Spring ACs and TIs are all over? I've been ghosted since my WG
Congrats! Could I ask when you did your VI and when are the AC slots?Latham AC!! My fingers are shaking as I type this lol. ANY insight at all will be so so so appreciated. Please pm me!
Thank you so much! & MBCongrats! Can I ask what firm?
Hi! This is really bad but they couldn't verify two of my work experiences (idk why) and kept calling me for extra detail etc so they could, but life got in the way and plus this relates to my current role I'm not that bothered about so I didn't treat it w much urgency (bad I know) and they ended up after like three months just asking me to sign a statement saying I worked in those places. Not to say you should do that by any means but I think it's just a formality tbh and they will not penalise you for accidentally putting the wrong dates down etc. Disclaimer -- at least in my experienceQuick question for anyone with experience with Vero (background checks). Do they use the work experience section as part of the application as the starting point to know who to contact/breakdown of your responsibilities or do you give them a separate breakdown? Asking because I made a small mistake regarding dates in my work experience section (regarding the year of the work experience, not duration) and am a little scared this might be an issue. @Jessica Booker would you have any thoughts on this? Thank you!
For me answering this question took honest reflection on why my performance had been lower than expected and out of line with my other grades. it would have been easy to blame the fact it was a closed book exam in June when then teaching ended in December but that wasn't the real issue. I answered by saying what that was so for me it was a fault with my approach to the module, it was an interdisciplinary module shared across a couple of courses focused in a very particular area of law so the exam was very different to a typical law module. I made the mistake of approaching it purely from a legal perspective without looking at the wider picture, my revision was heavily focused on learning the statute and cases and application of the law whereas the exam was more interested in theory and approaches and the societal impact of this area of law. I didn't look at the bigger picture. I then turned this into a positive by saying I now do not make this mistake and look at the aims of a task. I draw analogies to my work where on the face of it one clause in a contract in the individual may look disadvantageous but when taken int he whole of the contract it may be more positive or less of problem compared with the alternative which is not having a contract signed at all.Thank you! And yes of course, I would never say it was naff in an interview. Could I ask you how you answered that question? I know it would be personal for everyone, but I don't want really want to just say 'I found it quite difficult to understand'.