Very unlikely as the deadline for macfarlanes was last week and it's unlikely they've read and processed all applications already. And for links, I've heard they're running ACs until end of Feb so no worries!!If we haven’t heard from macfarlanes and links yet, is it a PFO most likely?!
Isn't the deadline tomorrow? or maybe that's only for VSVery unlikely as the deadline for macfarlanes was last week and it's unlikely they've read and processed all applications already. And for links, I've heard they're running ACs until end of Feb so no worries!!
It is a rejection when it comes in no news is no news.If we haven’t heard from macfarlanes and links yet, is it a PFO most likely?!
Having thought about the question a bit more deeply, I think you should be able to both demonstrate your interest and justify why that law should be introduced/what need it's addressing. With the obligation to provide genetic information, while you may be able to show your interest owing to your background, it may be hard to justify whether it's fulfilling a need because of the concern of discrimination that you raised.Oh thank you for your response.
Having been adopted, I was thinking about mentioning the obligation of providing genetic information for kids who are going to be adopted.
It is seems a bit weird but, for example, I would feel safer if I want to have a child. I could also give the opposite argument and argue that this could discriminate potential adoptees. The problem is to show the interest!
"I see the alt-right trolls lurking in the Legal Cheek comments going on about reverse racism and preferences always being given to women and minorities for jobs. I don't believe in that bull at all, but as a white, working-class Northerner male it is sadly quite tempting to make your mind wander towards cynicism when your peers with far less impressive CVs and worse grades seem to breeze through the application process (many of them have shown me their apps, so I am not throwing wild assumptions here)"Another cycle, another streak of rejections. People are getting ACs at HSF, HL, Links, S&M and I applied ages ago, which most likely means a bunch of PFOs for me. Have also already been rejected from 9 other firms. I have a CV with a vac at an MC, two insight schemes, citizens legal advice volunteering, full-time work in restaurants over the summer, internship at a famous think tank, leadership positions, a 1st class degree, speak 4 languages, but to no avail. I even get my apps reviewed and edited by friends who work at the firms I am applying to - several of them are shocked I am not even getting VIs/WGs/TIs. I definitely don't think I am entitled to a job, but it does feel a bit strange I don't at least get a chance to show what I am capable of in an interview. If they want to reject me at that stage - fine, at least then I know they rejected me after giving me a fair chance.
I see the alt-right trolls lurking in the Legal Cheek comments going on about reverse racism and preferences always being given to women and minorities for jobs. I don't believe in that bull at all, but as a white, working-class Northerner male it is sadly quite tempting to make your mind wander towards cynicism when your peers with far less impressive CVs and worse grades seem to breeze through the application process (many of them have shown me their apps, so I am not throwing wild assumptions here).
Was your invite from TopScore (the same portal as the written exercise & initial video interview)? I have been sent another link, yet It doesn't say any date, or time - just in invite to videoconferencing..Anyone have any advice for the Dechert AC?
hi, for vac schemeHey! Congrats, is this for vac or TC?
This is from their automatic email "Please note, you will only receive our online test if you have past the first stage screen of your application form". So do they review the app again with the test or that's it I passed the application form stage? I am very confused!Is BCLP's test automatic?
This is what I found on their website "If we like your application form, we will then ask you to complete our online test."
But this is what the email says "As part of the screening process, we require all candidates to take our online test."
No I had an email last week and they've just sent another email from GR with the Teams links and time etc. Maybe email GR to confirm?Was your invite from TopScore (the same portal as the written exercise & initial video interview)? I have been sent another link, yet It doesn't say any date, or time - just in invite to videoconferencing..
Where was your degree from (don't actually tell me, but just a point to consider - if it's from a not as well regarded/not well known foreign uni maybe that impacts things)?Another cycle, another streak of rejections. People are getting ACs at HSF, HL, Links, S&M and I applied ages ago, which most likely means a bunch of PFOs for me. Have also already been rejected from 9 other firms. I have a CV with a vac at an MC, two insight schemes, citizens legal advice volunteering, full-time work in restaurants over the summer, internship at a famous think tank, leadership positions, a 1st class degree, speak 4 languages, but to no avail. I even get my apps reviewed and edited by friends who work at the firms I am applying to - several of them are shocked I am not even getting VIs/WGs/TIs. I definitely don't think I am entitled to a job, but it does feel a bit strange I don't at least get a chance to show what I am capable of in an interview. If they want to reject me at that stage - fine, at least then I know they rejected me after giving me a fair chance.
I see the alt-right trolls lurking in the Legal Cheek comments going on about reverse racism and preferences always being given to women and minorities for jobs. I don't believe in that bull at all, but as a white, working-class Northerner male it is sadly quite tempting to make your mind wander towards cynicism when your peers with far less impressive CVs and worse grades seem to breeze through the application process (many of them have shown me their apps, so I am not throwing wild assumptions here).