2020-21 Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

whisperingrock

Legendary Member
Forum Winner
  • Sep 12, 2020
    226
    567
    To be explicitly clear, they used the term "shut me down", I used it back in response. I did not initiate the use of that phraseology. And you've conveniently cut the full phrase to a point where it looks substantially ruder than it was. Whisperingrock was complaining that their comment had been shut down (their wording) without due consideration or a valid counter argument. I responded that I'd shut down their comment with substantial consideration and multiple counter arguments.
    Secondly, their knowledge is limited and biased. That's an objective fact. I stated in my response that my own experience is also limited and biased, the difference between us is that I'm not projecting my limited and biased opinion as a universal truth.
    And it is a clear, legitimate possibility that they aren't good as assessing the quality of other people's essays. Why is it somehow rude or insulting to question whether it's possible that they're fallible in some way?

    I'm sorry if I offended you in any way - it was not my intention. However, the ability to determine objective fact from opinion based upon limited data is a basic skill required by lawyers. As is the ability to consider our own flaws and the implications of that.
    You seem to have conveniently ignored my comment where I said my opinion wasn't a universal truth and I wasn't projecting it as such. You seem to all be reading an awful lot into what I'm saying. All I expected is that Jessica actually respond to what I said instead of saying something that had literally nothing to do with it as a "gotcha" comment.
     

    jan28

    Legendary Member
    Future Trainee
    M&A Bootcamp
    Sep 12, 2019
    423
    994

    Andrew M

    Legendary Member
    Forum Winner
    Jan 7, 2020
    516
    2,029
    To be explicitly clear, they used the term "shut me down", I used it back in response. I did not initiate the use of that phraseology. And you've conveniently cut the full phrase to a point where it looks substantially ruder than it was. Whisperingrock was complaining that their comment had been shut down (their wording) without due consideration or a valid counter argument. I responded that I'd shut down their comment with substantial consideration and multiple counter arguments.
    Secondly, their knowledge is limited and biased. That's an objective fact. I stated in my response that my own experience is also limited and biased, the difference between us is that I'm not projecting my limited and biased opinion as a universal truth.
    And it is a clear, legitimate possibility that they aren't good as assessing the quality of other people's essays. Why is it somehow rude or insulting to question whether it's possible that they're fallible in some way?

    I'm sorry if I offended you in any way - it was not my intention. However, the ability to determine objective fact from opinion based upon limited data is a basic skill required by lawyers. As is the ability to consider our own flaws and the implications of that.

    You seem to have conveniently ignored my comment where I said my opinion wasn't a universal truth and I wasn't projecting it as such. You seem to all be reading an awful lot into what I'm saying. All I expected is that Jessica actually respond to what I said instead of saying something that had literally nothing to do with it as a "gotcha" comment.

    Can we just put this to bed now please? This forum really isn't the place for squabbling.
     

    Jessica Booker

    Legendary Member
    TCLA Moderator
    Gold Member
    Graduate Recruitment
    Premium Member
    Forum Team
    Aug 1, 2019
    14,658
    20,352
    You seem to have conveniently ignored my comment where I said my opinion wasn't a universal truth and I wasn't projecting it as such. You seem to all be reading an awful lot into what I'm saying. All I expected is that Jessica actually respond to what I said instead of saying something that had literally nothing to do with it as a "gotcha" comment.
    Often your tone is set in a way I don’t want to get into a discussion with you any further. It often isn’t a pleasant experience for me.
     

    MzM

    Valued Member
    Future Trainee
    Sep 11, 2019
    109
    399
    Just got an email from Linklaters with the subject line 'time is running out...'

    Yes, before my patience completely evaporates.

    Tik Tok Time GIF by Bear Hands
     

    gg332dd

    Valued Member
    Apr 2, 2020
    119
    268
    At the risk of sounding like a broken record - is anyone else still waiting on DLA?

    Heard zilch since submitting the tests on 13 November. I'm not pulling petals from flowers so we move on

    I emailed them the other day for an update. Apparently they rejected me months ago but they had a problem in December where they couldn't send emails to anyone with gmail so
     
    • Like
    Reactions: FM302989

    FM302989

    Legendary Member
    Junior Lawyer
  • Oct 16, 2020
    289
    1,162
    I emailed them the other day for an update. Apparently they rejected me months ago but they had a problem in December where they couldn't send emails to anyone with gmail so
    That's such a naff response DLmAo.

    Yeah like I said, I moved on when I didn't hear back and put my work into more and better applications

    Never put all your eggs in one basket folks, cos that basket may have faulty software
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.