Hey Guest, do you have a question for graduate recruitment? Gemma Baker from Willkie is live to answer your questions!
I think so. You could also mention your typing speed and any programming languages you know.Fox Williams asks “how do you rate your computer skills?” and then asks for details! What do they want here? Is it just competency with Microsoft Office?
Or if you have any legal work experience and have experience with matter management systems etc, then put this here as wellI think so. You could also mention your typing speed and any programming languages you know.
I have been wondering this too and it’s definitely age discrimination. They saw they will consider all apps because if they didn’t I’m guessing someone could actually sue them? I’m non law so apols if that’s not how this works.Wonder why CC pretty much only take penultimate students now for vacs and direct tc’s. Seems a bit discriminatory imo. Why is someone in their second year of uni better qualified to apply than someone in their final year/who’s graduated? They could all pretty much still start at the same time too, even if it was a year later.
Thank you ! I’ll do thatHi
My portal status says "In Process". Maybe forward your confirmation email to Grad Recruitment and see if it's just a glitch?
Thank you both!Or if you have any legal work experience and have experience with matter management systems etc, then put this here as well
I have been wondering this too and it’s definitely age discrimination. They saw they will consider all apps because if they didn’t I’m guessing someone could actually sue them? I’m non law so apols if that’s not how this works.
I emailed CC about this in August. I’m a post grad. They told me for 2023 TC they’ve already given a significant number of the TCs to people from the SPARK scheme. I think first years are their actual target market. I guess the aim is to take the talent before other firms do.I have been wondering this too and it’s definitely age discrimination. They saw they will consider all apps because if they didn’t I’m guessing someone could actually sue them? I’m non law so apols if that’s not how this works.
Still doesn't explain why the rest of the TC places can't (or won't likely) go to people who are beyond their penultimate year.I emailed CC about this in August. I’m a post grad. They told me for 2023 TC they’ve already given a significant number of the TCs to people from the SPARK scheme. I think first years are their actual target market. I guess the aim is to take the talent before other firms do.
They actually have a YouTube video explaining their reasoning behind it:Still doesn't explain why the rest of the TC places can't (or won't likely) go to people who are beyond their penultimate year.
They actually have a YouTube video explaining their reasoning behind it:
I am not convinced by it - it constricts certain groups in being successful and personally, that doesn't sit well with me. TC's should be open to everyone, rather than targetted. Hence, I will never apply to CC again.They actually have a YouTube video explaining their reasoning behind it:
True. I do think CC’s approach is a bit short sighted. Graduates will have more to offer in my opinion. They’ll likely have relevant work experience and perhaps a better understanding of what they’re getting themselves into.Still doesn't explain why the rest of the TC places can't (or won't likely) go to people who are beyond their penultimate year.
I agree. It's the kind of restrictiveness that other firms are moving away from...I am not convinced by it - it constricts certain groups in being successful and personally, that doesn't sit well with me. TC's should be open to everyone, rather than targetted. Hence, I will never apply to CC again.
Quite an unnecessarily long video that aims to say a lot but ends up not saying much at all. They are prioritising applicants in penultimate year purely because of the number of people applying? This disadvantages career changers, mature students further along, and graduates unnecessarily.They actually have a YouTube video explaining their reasoning behind it:
I agree. Having to review a lot of applications isn’t a valid reason to exclude ‘older’ candidates.I am not convinced by it - it constricts certain groups in being successful and personally, that doesn't sit well with me. TC's should be open to everyone, rather than targetted. Hence, I will never apply to CC again.
I ... kinda feel like if you want a certain mould of a lawyer, you get them young and train them up. It feels like a control thing.True. I do think CC’s approach is a bit short sighted. Graduates will have more to offer in my opinion. They’ll likely have relevant work experience and perhaps a better understanding of what they’re getting themselves into.
I agree. It's the kind of restrictiveness that other firms are moving away from...
And I'm completely objective here, given that I haven't looked to apply as I don't want to work in London.
It is literally the most ridiculous excuse I have seen, other firms with more applications have worked around this so surely CC can too instead of being unnecessarily selective.I agree. Having to review a lot of applications isn’t a valid reason to exclude ‘older’ candidates.
To add to this, if a lot of TCs are being given to first years, what are CC evaluating? Surely at the time of application the first years won’t have many undergraduate grades. Are they assessing candidates based almost solely on A levels? It’s just such a strange method of recruitment in my opinion.Quite an unnecessarily long video that aims to say a lot but ends up not saying much at all. They are prioritising applicants in penultimate year purely because of the number of people applying? This disadvantages career changers, mature students further along, and graduates unnecessarily.
Disclaimer: I don't have a vendetta against CC! I am just genuinely perplexed as to their rationale when no other firm I know of, including other MCs that get huge applicant numbers, like FF, did not take this stance post covid.