Yes - that is how I read it. It is not uncommon for firms of that size to not sponsor the GDL/PGDL but still require it.
It maybe that the structure of their LLM SQE course needs a level of legal knowledge to start it/be successful in it.
I'd wait until Tuesday morning now - no point contacting them over the weekend, and you might as well wait to see if they contact you on Monday.
If they don't, it would nearly be two weeks and that is a reasonable time to ask when you will hear back (rather than what the outcome is).
They may have chosen not to select you given you have already done an open day with them. As a recruiter, I wouldn't necessarily see the benefit in someone attending two open days, especially if they are similar. I would prefer to give the opportunity to someone I hadn't met before. If I felt...
You do not need to do the PGDL to qualify and work as a lawyer in England and Wales - it is no longer a requirement as a qualifying law degree no longer exists if you want to be a solicitor. You just need any degree level qualification (in any subject).
The PGDL will give you the foundation of...
This win's strangest question of the cycle!! The recruitment person or partner involved in trainee recruitment must be a Toy Story fan...
Even I am struggling to think on this... What if your favourite toy was lego or a racing car or your bike? They can't exactly come to life....
I now have...
Yes - you can still include your university activities (and even those from school/college if appropriate). Firms like to see you kept yourself busy during your studies when you are ultimately a lot less busy than you are when you are in full-time employment.
If you have been involved in...
It is disappointing to have to say this, but please keep conversations respectful in the forums.
You don’t have to agree with everyone, but if you want to challenge their opinions, avoid personal attacks or insults.
Please keep this in mind - I really don't want to have to start having to give...
They are looking for what factors you consider to be important when applying to firms and how they then fit into this. You don’t have to include details of the numbers of applications, and you don’t have to name individual firms (although I personally find it more persuasive and impactful when...
I don’t see the harm in applying for the specific open day for your university. Open days can be very competitive, so if this gives you an opportunity to attend something similar, I would apply (if it was me).
I recommend going to these events if you can but it’s not an issue if you don’t attend.
There maybe a system where you effectively get a “star” flag for attending events like this (but you can get them via law fairs too) but I wouldn’t say they take notes on how you “performed” at a dinner. It...
This can be a side effect of running open days for very specific groups.
Their open days only seem to be for first years or penultimate year undergraduates/penultimate year postgraduates - this is likely to then influence their vacation schemes cohorts, who are more likely to be made up of...
It being an apprenticeship is not an issue - you have got a training contract, you are just combining your SQE studies with work. This is not a "weaker" format of training - it is identical to a training contract, you just study concurrently rather then prior to your QWE.
However, there is a...
I think you can rely less on the "why law" aspect and focus more on the "why the firm" and then touch briefly upon what you hope to gain from the scheme.
I wouldn’t worry about ideal examples - the example doesn’t really matter, it is more the explanation of how you took the feedback and then acted on it that is important.
In terms of structure I would:
- Explain the context of the situation you received the constructive feedback (what led you...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.