Does anyone have any insights into the Payne Hicks Beach TC AC? Thanks very much in advance!
am i right in thinking it’s the assessment day 24th april, then if successful we get invited to insight day and training contract final interview mid june??? the wording of the emails is confusing me!Hill Dickinson AC being 7.5h long and not even the Last stage is mad
I would say this would actually be quite difficult. In-house roles tend to be much more corporate/commercial based, with general advisory work (eg regulations) rather than having a litigation focus. There might be some in-house roles that are more litigation specific and in those cases it could be okay. But ultimately if you want to work in private practice and especially in litigation, I would recommend training in private practice rather than in-house.Thank you Jessica for your response. If I were keen to qualify into litigation in private practice - would you say this would be more feasible?
Thank you so much Andrei! I also wanted to ask what resources are usually available on the firm-provided device for such research? Is there open access to the web?The tasks that I have completed in my vacations schemes I think were quite illustrative for what one may expect to find in the respective practice areas:
As for the skills you can work on prior to the VS to maximize your chances of completing your tasks to a high standard, I would list the following:
- In corporate M&A/PE: reviewed contracts for chance of control clauses, reviewed and prepared a memo on a due diligence report prepared by the seller's counsel, drafted clauses for ancillary documents, took notes on meetings, researched legal uses of particular legal instruments in transactions (such as purpose of using a deeds in an M&A deal).
- In litigation: many research-centered tasks, whether on substantive legal points pertaining to a dispute, procedural rules for submission of documents to a court, or past damages figures awarded for similar litigations.
- In financial regulatory (although I suspect it applies more broadly to advisory practices): again research-heavy tasks, which were however more focused around regulatory frameworks and prior decisions of regulatory bodies such as the FCA and PRA.
- Research skills: as you have seen legal and commercial research is a core part of work in a law firm, particularly for juniors. As such, it could be very helpful to familiarize yourself with Westlaw and LexisNexis, particularly in relation to use of short cuts and filters.
- Drafting skills: as important as research skills is the ability to communicate legal points in a precise manner. In transactional practices this is essential, as the details of your writing will one day determine the rights and obligations of the parties, but it should not be overlooked for advisory and contentious practices either. In most cases, you will need to communicate your findings via an email or a memo and you will need to simplify your research into a shorter format whilst retaining all the relevant nuance. Moreover, more generally, a big part of the assessment of your work product will come down to how well structured and clear your writing is.
- Planning skills: a significant part of ensuring you complete many tasks to a high standard will come down to proper planning, ensuring you (i) have enough on your plate to keep you busy but not so much that you get overwhelmed; and (ii) have received proper instructions. Both of these I think come down to asking the right set of questions when you are receiving a task and noting down answers and further instructions.
Sorry for double-posting @Andrei Radu! But do you have any tips for preparing for a client pitch exercise and a negotiation exercise? How can I go about preparing for each and what can I expect?Thank you so much Andrei! I also wanted to ask what resources are usually available on the firm-provided device for such research? Is there open access to the web?
Glad I could helpThank you so much Andrei! I also wanted to ask what resources are usually available on the firm-provided device for such research? Is there open access to the web?
Great, thank you!I scored 3 average and 2 below average with work ethic, ownership and social adaptability as my top strengths.
In previous years, some candidates progressed to the telephone interview stage with below average, while others didn’t progress despite having above average scores.
![]()
2020-21 Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion
If it's helpful - my rejected application for the Freshers Meet Freshfields 2018 event was updated in January 2021, so I really don't think you guys need to be too concerned about when the portal was updated.www.thecorporatelawacademy.com
![]()
2020-21 Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion
Wow I've just caught up with this and gone on a whole journey from university debates to Gordon Ramsay memes, I love this forum 🤩 Regarding the RG vs Non-RG universities debate, I was just wondering whether GR typically take subjects into account (beyond the law vs non-law level) as well? I ask...www.thecorporatelawacademy.com
I also noticed that some candidates progressed with the same strengths to mine, so I’m hoping Mayer Brown still values those same strengths 😅
![]()
2020-21 Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion
Does anyone have any tips for the White & Case Video Interview? Are the questions pretty standard? How many questions and how long to prepare/answer?www.thecorporatelawacademy.com
![]()
Hearing Back from Law Firms, Assessment Centres & Interview Tips - 2019 - 2020
Has anyone here ever gotten average scores for all but one with the Mayer Brown VRT & progressed ? I feel as though, those scores are perhaps what they look out for more than the situational judgement. So if you score a over average in all, plus have a good app..the you get through. Cause the...www.thecorporatelawacademy.com
Thanks for the adviceI would say this would actually be quite difficult. In-house roles tend to be much more corporate/commercial based, with general advisory work (eg regulations) rather than having a litigation focus. There might be some in-house roles that are more litigation specific and in those cases it could be okay. But ultimately if you want to work in private practice and especially in litigation, I would recommend training in private practice rather than in-house.
When did you hear from them?Hill Dickinson AC being 7.5h long and not even the Last stage is mad
AC invite on 26/03 - marineWhen did you hear from them?
I think soam i right in thinking it’s the assessment day 24th april, then if successful we get invited to insight day and training contract final interview mid june??? the wording of the emails is confusing me!
oh wow have you heard from them!Does anyone have any insights into the Payne Hicks Beach TC AC? Thanks very much in advance!![]()
Seems everyone who has heard post VI heard on that day for some reason.AC invite on 26/03 - marine
For a client pitch, I think there are three areas to consider (although the first one is likely to be of central importance):Sorry for double-posting @Andrei Radu! But do you have any tips for preparing for a client pitch exercise and a negotiation exercise? How can I go about preparing for each and what can I expect?
Got it today! Thank you again!I got my feedback report (if you can really cal it that, quite short and pretty boiler plate). Nothing else before though so you should be fine so long as you clicked submit. Took a day to get the report
i saw someone on here asking for advice about the AC so i’m assuming they’ve heard, i haven’t eitherIs it fair to assume a pfo from PHB considering they said they will get back to all applicants today![]()
Hmm most likely a pfo then considering their ac is on 8 9 10i saw someone on here asking for advice about the AC so i’m assuming they’ve heard, i haven’t either
i assume when they said "everyone will hear whether or not" they meant it. but maybe we'll get our pfos in the morning!?Hmm most likely a pfo then considering their ac is on 8 9 10![]()