How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register HereThank you! I found out yesterday for summer.When did you find out if you don't mind me asking? Best of luckhope you get the vac scheme
Congratulations!! 🥳🥳 just quoting a helpful post from @Amma Usman which you might find helpful 😁Thank you! I found out yesterday for summer.
You will likely find this useful. It is worth bearing in mind the firm may have adapted these in the current cycle, though generally firms tend to keep certain elements over the years - https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/forum/threads/linklaters-vacation-scheme-interview-2021.3425/
Summer scheme and I received it at 5:24pm yesterday eveningCongratulations! If you don't mind me asking, is this for the spring or summer scheme? And when did you receive it?
Thank you very much!Hiya @Defnefresko
It sounds like you're on the right trackIt’s not necessarily a bad idea to mention a specific ultra-high-net-worth client, but the key is to ensure you can clearly articulate how the firm could advise them and why introducing that client would make for interesting work. This can be more challenging when discussing private clients because their legal needs are often less transparent than those of companies, where public information is more readily available.
If you do want to focus on a UHNW individual, try to think about what specific legal needs they might have and how the firm is best positioned to address these. This could be tax structuring, succession planning, cross-border matters, or relocation issues, for example. You don’t necessarily need to name an individual, but framing your answer around a certain type of client with a set of relevant challenges could be effective. Alternatively, discussing a company can often make it easier to illustrate why the firm is well-suited to act for them, as there’s usually more public information available to support your argument.
If the firm advises both private clients and businesses, you might consider discussing an UHNW individual who owns a business and how the firm could support both their personal wealth structuring and the legal needs of their company (this scenario sometimes comes up in law firm commercial exercises). This approach allows you to tie together different aspects of the firm’s expertise (both its private client and commercial capabilities).
I hope this helps and good luck with your application!
Congratulations! 🥳🥳 Could I also ask if you noticed the progress percentage (66%/77%) before your invite? Also, did you notice if there was a tick by application review?Summer scheme and I received it at 5:24pm yesterday evening
Thank you so much!You will likely find this useful. It is worth bearing in mind the firm may have adapted these in the current cycle, though generally firms tend to keep certain elements over the years - https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/forum/threads/linklaters-vacation-scheme-interview-2021.3425/
Thank you! Yes it was at 77% and there was a tick by application review.Congratulations! 🥳🥳 Could I also ask if you noticed the progress percentage (66%/77%) before your invite? Also, did you notice if there was a tick by application review?
30 sec. prep, 90 sec. answerdoes anyone know how long we have to prep/answer the CRS VI questions??
Hey can I ask if you received the feedback report since I have notTrowers Birmingham AC!
Did you receive a feedback report for the online assessment?Trowers London AC!!
Thank you so much!! I really appreciate it 😊 all the best, you’ll absolutely smash it 😎🍀Thank you! Yes it was at 77% and there was a tick by application review.
Yeah they have
Have you heard back?Same here. I was allocated Trowers as part of 10K Black Interns
Jeez, who's that for? If you wanted to hit the limit on each question, you could be liberal with examples of motivations and competencies to further reinforce what you would've said in 300 words600 words each for three questions is so tricky - how does one effectively ramble on for so long :/