It's pretty silly anyway. They may overlook it.I also made this mistake in a few places so I’ve pretty much prepared for the immediate PFO. 🤣💀
If I get past the first stage it’ll be a miracle. 😭
It's pretty silly anyway. They may overlook it.I also made this mistake in a few places so I’ve pretty much prepared for the immediate PFO. 🤣💀
If I get past the first stage it’ll be a miracle. 😭
Nah bro if you work really hard on your app they will offer you AC...Almost as if that's what they care for...
At the open day, Paul said he doesn't mind either way of phrasing / spelling it as long as consistent so don't think it's an immediate PFOI also made this mistake in a few places so I’ve pretty much prepared for the immediate PFO. 🤣💀
If I get past the first stage it’ll be a miracle. 😭
Hopefully I get extra brownie points for referring to the firm’s full name accurately in my application. 🤣💀At the open day, Paul said he doesn't mind either way of phrasing / spelling it as long as consistent so don't think it's an immediate PFO![]()
I would advise against this to be honest. 🙂Do we reckon I can shorten Paul, Weiss to P,W at all lmao I am so tight on word count
I always thought shortening was ok so I referred to them as PW for most of it?I would advise against this to be honest. 🙂
It’s better to stick to Paul, Weiss just to be on the safer side. 🙂
If you are tight on the word count try and see if you can rephrase and shorten sentences. 🙂
I think shortening is fine but it depends on the firm and how they refer to themselves and how they are referred to in media publications. 🫡I always thought shortening was ok so I referred to them as PW for most of it?
rule of thumb, add structure to your answer to prevent you from being too short/ too rambly e.g I chose law for two/three main reasons etc etc. really helped me to stay on track when the nerves kicked in.this is a bit of a silly question, but if at an AC a firm asks you "why law", how long should I ideally be going on for..?