How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register HereIf the application form has “why me” and —a “extra curricular” section it is important of not just use this question as an opportunity to carry over details that could have been included elsewhere. Generally, I would only recommend adding any details in this section that you feel are important context to your application but that you don’t have the ability to provide elsewhere (eg you have not been asked the question/given the opportunity to explain).After one purely motivational question, Addleshaw Goddard has the additional question: "Use this space to tell us about any mitigating circumstances that you might have or any other information about you that might be relevant to your application.". Besides mitigating circumstances, is it common/does it make sense to use this section as a "Why me?" section, for example detailing skills and positions of responsibility? Or should I simply leave it blank if I don't have any mitigating circumstances? (If I had to guess, I would assume that it was intended to be only about information akin to mitigating circumstances, but I can't be sure.)
I would take that as encouragement to reapply. I doubt they send that to all applicants.Guys is this true or is this what they usually say as a PFO?
I’d stress there is not a consistent approach to this.For writing a memo, if I'm trying to address multiple separate topics is it appropriate to use numbered bullet points in the executive summary to summarise each key topic. Also, when addressing each topic in depth is it appropriate to use numbered points again, or should I be writing in full prose?
Sorry for what is probably a dumb question, but I've looked online and I'm struggling to see a consistent approach that I can be confident in going into my AC.
Focus on key responsibilities (you rarely have to list everything you have done) and any specific outcomes/success generated from those responsibilities.How should I be writing the work experience bit in applications. Should I just be writing what I did?
I got White & Case VI and AC without any Open Day - they're not essential, but they are nice to do, and some of them are still open for applications such as Cooley and W&C. Chin up and keep plugging away at it. Something will come up.Guys is this true or is this what they usually say as a PFO?
Hey, was this after AC?HSF rejection :/ so far only rejections losing hope again
No, passing the SJT and application onlyHey, was this after AC?
You can use your discretion with this as to what you think is appropriate but generally I would provide as many entries as possible even if it is going back some time.For career changers/older applicants with more experience. How far back are you going with work experience? Is the past five years sufficient or do I go further back!?
Is 10 or more work experience entries too much. Idk if graduate recruitment would become a bit restless with reading so many 200 - 250word entries. On top of their application questions ?You can use your discretion with this as to what you think is appropriate but generally I would provide as many entries as possible even if it is going back some time.
For instance, I probably wouldn’t list all my part time jobs separately I did from 14-21 but I would list out the ski season I worked at the age of 18 because it was a full time role and for a period of time I was out of education.