On Monday!When did you do your interview if you don't mind me asking?
How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register HereOn Monday!When did you do your interview if you don't mind me asking?
Damn. I took an L then haha. Congrats and good luck on the AC!On Monday!
Thank you! But you might still get invited so don’t lose hope yet!Damn. I took an L then haha. Congrats and good luck on the AC!
Thank you and the Birmingham office!!
I don’t think they get back to unsuccessful candidates ☹️Anyone still waiting on withers and TS? I know TS apparently the interviews are done but I still haven’t been PFOd yet 😫
I think it is all about perspective. It depends on how you look at it as lawyers would say. If you are focusing on capital markets, you would mention certain firms, if you are focusing on energy, ESG work, you would focus on other firms as competitors. The same goes for litigation or international arbitration, competitors of W&C in these sectors might be different than their capital markets one.Someone please correct me if I’m wrong as I don’t know the approach to take on these questions, but when you’re focusing on who a firm’s competitors are, is there a “right answer”?
For example, if I’m looking at White & Case’s competitors, would Norton Rose Fulbright be one due to its strength in projects and energy like W&C? Or would it better to just go with Latham, Clifford Chance etc with the capital market focus?
I don’t want to try and be “too clever” for my own good if that makes sense and end up tripping myself up!
This is a very good answer and I was about to say the same exact thing! @GivemeatcpleaseI would describe a typical memorandum as a brief *internal* communication from one person/party to another. It should be a concise summary of key points that can easily be understood.
As a very general suggestion…you can often structure something like this with an executive summary, a few clear paragraphs discussing each point in more detail, and a conclusion. There should be plenty of examples of this (including headings, formalities etc.) available online.
(I assume in the context of a written exercise that this is the sort of memo which you are referring to. It has a second meaning in contract law but I doubt that would come up in a written exercise.)
Congratulations!!!
Congratulations! You should be so proud of yourself! You will smash it for sure!NRF AC!! First ever AC for a law firm)
Hi ! So I heard back this Morning ish, but I did my VI like last Friday so just under a week 🙏🏽🙏🏽Well done that’s amazing! When did you hear back?
Thank you Axel! Couldn’t have done it without you and the TCLA’s team high quality advice on approaching applications ! 🙏🏽🧡Congratulations! You should be so proud of yourself! You will smash it for sure!
oh i must have missed that then hahaha, oh wellI don’t think they get back to unsuccessful candidates ☹️
Thank you so much, thats very helpful!I would describe a typical memorandum as a brief *internal* communication from one person/party to another. It should be a concise summary of key points that can easily be understood.
As a very general suggestion…you can often structure something like this with an executive summary, a few clear paragraphs discussing each point in more detail, and a conclusion. There should be plenty of examples of this (including headings, formalities etc.) available online.
(I assume in the context of a written exercise that this is the sort of memo which you are referring to. It has a second meaning in contract law but I doubt that would come up in a written exercise.)