has anyone heard from Irwin Mitchell for legal services for individuals? I know a few have heard back for business
It doesn’t mean anything at all - it can just be the way it plays out. All it could be is down to your assessors not being able to catch up to discuss your feedback while other candidates’ assessors have. You really can’t assume it means anything.@Jessica Booker What does it mean if others have gotten rejected/received offers after an AC that took place around the same time, but others have not heard back?
Fingers crossed, I am rooting for you!!!Would appreciate any last minute advice for the FF AC![]()
![]()
How many direct tcs did you apply? and how was the response for them?My Application Summary Credits: @Legalstalker
FYI: a mixture of winter, spring and summer vacation schemes + a few direct TCs
- Total applications this cycle ~ 35
- Rejections post app: ~ 9
- Rejections post 1st or 2nd stage: ~14
- Awaiting to hear from: ~1 (Baker Mckenzie Spring)
- SJT/VI’s still to do: 0
- AC's this cycle: 12
- VS offers: Gibson, Hogan + Osborne (all summer)
- Latest rejection: Mayer Brown
- Hardest rejection: Clifford Chance Direct TC - prepped so, so hard for it too
- Easiest rejection: Linklaters
- Ghosted me: N/A
- Best Grad Recruitment: Slaughter
- Tedious Application Process: Kirkland
- If I had converted my first AC, I would have done only 2 applications
- If I had converted my second AC I would have only done 9 applications
- If I had converted my third, fourth or fifth AC, I would have done 35 applications
12 ACs and 3 VS offers is very impressive, congrats!!My Application Summary Credits: @Legalstalker
FYI: a mixture of winter, spring and summer vacation schemes + a few direct TCs
- Total applications this cycle ~ 35
- Rejections post app: ~ 9
- Rejections post 1st or 2nd stage: ~14
- Awaiting to hear from: ~1 (Baker Mckenzie Spring)
- SJT/VI’s still to do: 0
- AC's this cycle: 12
- VS offers: Gibson, Hogan + Osborne (all summer)
- Latest rejection: Mayer Brown
- Hardest rejection: Clifford Chance Direct TC - prepped so, so hard for it too
- Easiest rejection: Linklaters
- Ghosted me: N/A
- Best Grad Recruitment: Slaughter
- Tedious Application Process: Kirkland
- If I had converted my first AC, I would have done only 2 applications
- If I had converted my second AC I would have only done 9 applications
- If I had converted my third, fourth or fifth AC, I would have done 35 applications
Did you apply for the Spring or Summer scheme?Farrer & Co VS!!🥳
Indeed, the advice does seem a bit impractical. When you consider the sheer volume of applications these firms receive, it's hard to imagine that making a fleeting digital connection or reaching out for advice will sway the odds in your favour.View attachment 5894
I stumbled upon this on TikTok and wondered if this post was actually accurate as it strikes me as somewhat forced/inane?
I’m not disputing that 1, 3, and 5 are good points, I just think 2 and 4 are weird. How will connecting with graduate recruitment on LinkedIn help you at all? They’re not going to offer preferential treatment, if they remember your name at all, so what purpose does that serve?
Same with 4, unless you have a connection at said firm, what trainee or associate is going to spend their time reading and offering tailored advice to a stranger on their application? When some of these firms receive 4,000 applications, again, why would they offer preferential treatment?
Perhaps I’m being overly pessimistic or am I accurate here?
Spring, I didn’t know there was a summer one lmaoDid you apply for the Spring or Summer scheme?
I would echo what @isTeapp said but I’d advise checking the requirements for each firm carefully before spending a long time on an application.Hi guys, is it worth applying for a direct TC despite having no vac scheme experience/legal experience and being a 2nd year law student? Not sure if I would be wasting my time doing so if I can't even get onto a vac scheme
Maybe it would be better to wait until winter vac schemes open. Not sure...
Thank you and they said they will provide written feedback so I don't know what to expect. As I know some on the forum have had written feedback post AC and have found them generic so I am hoping it is not generic so that I know where I can improve.It is very firm specific unfortunately. I heard that some firms send emails whilst others call. I think it really depends but I did hear that the feedbacks are not as exhaustive.
This is reassuring to hear and yes get your point about it there for future AC's prep. Yes, agree I can raise any queries in emails if I want clarification on an aspect.I haven't heard of this before but I would say that this might not be too bad;
- you have the feedback to hand to refer back to instead of being reliant on scribbling things down during the call
- you can (hopefully) get a pretty clear idea of what they are looking for in the AC/how it is scored. This is likely to be similar for many firms so you should be able to see where you can improve in the future.
I think if the written feedback raises any questions, they might be willing to clarify in a follow-up email as well if you felt comfortable asking. At least you're hopefully getting some useful written points even if not a full feedback call (which isn't always even that helpful depending on the firm).