I would say make sure you outline which generative AI platform your referring to, be specific. Chat GPT and Grammerly both use generative AI but they're very different in their capabilities. I would also talk about subscription packages - GPT 4 and Grammerly plus both require a paid subscription - consider that when discussing the playing field.Not sure how to answer that in an application, but I genuinely agree with your point.
I am neurodiverse and because of it I sometimes struggle to put my thoughts into words. So AI has been life changing for me. It helps me brainstorm cause it's like having someone talking with me about a topic. Even if I am not using it, the fact that I have something that can help me put my thoughts into words eases my anxiety.
Plus, AI is inevitably going to be integrated into various aspects of our lives and using AI is a skill in itself (eg. prompting chat gpt).
Out of curiosity, which firm is this for? That's a very unique questionThe use of generative AI in recruitment is a particularly hot topic amongst candidates and recruitment teams alike. What are your views on candidates using generative AI in recruitment processes? Is it cheating, or being resourceful? Does it level the playing field, or make it harder for some? There is no right or wrong answer to this question (yet!), but we are interested to hear your opinions on this topic.
How would you guys approach this question? Personally, I believe that these tools can help candidates articulate their experiences and skills more effectively, ensuring that their applications are reflective of their true capabilities and potential. Especially for individuals who may struggle with expressing themselves in writing or face barriers due to various factors such as neurodiversity, AI can level the playing field, providing an opportunity to present themselves in the best light. This doesn't necessarily equate to cheating, provided the candidates are honest about their experiences, their skills and the role AI played in their application.
I know they say there is no right or wrong answer, but I'm aware that many firms are strongly against the use of AI in this context. Given this situation, how should I approach this issue? Should I voice my true opinion, or align with the more commonly held view against AI usage in job applications?
I also recognise that recruitment processes are designed not just to know a candidate's experiences and skills, but also test their communication skills. And AI-generated responses can obscure this quality.
@Jessica Booker , I would be interested in knowing your opinion. Thank you!
I think they review it first coz I applied last week and still haven't received a test.Is the Fieldfisher Diversity scheme test automatic or do they review apps first?
Thanks for clarifying! This is very reassuringI would apply if I was you. I know people (including me) who had grades similar to you who got on to the scheme with some converting this into a TC!
Thank you so much for your insights!Not sure how to answer that in an application, but I genuinely agree with your point.
I am neurodiverse and because of it I sometimes struggle to put my thoughts into words. So AI has been life changing for me. It helps me brainstorm cause it's like having someone talking with me about a topic. Even if I am not using it, the fact that I have something that can help me put my thoughts into words eases my anxiety.
Plus, AI is inevitably going to be integrated into various aspects of our lives and using AI is a skill in itself (eg. prompting chat gpt).
I think it’s good to be honest and express your thoughts as you have just done. In the question they say that there is no right or wrong answer and I think your thoughts are quite interestingThank you so much for your insights!
And using AI doesn't mean fully relying on it for crafting answers, but rather using it as a helpful tool to express thoughts more effectively, which I find beneficial. I can also see the reasons why some firms might prefer candidates not to use it, especially when evaluating written communication skills, as it could be misleading. However, for this application, I think I need to choose a side, and personally, I lean more towards being in favour of using AI assistance rather than being completely against it.
And exactly! I feel like in today’s digital and rapidly evolving job market, technological proficiency is very important and using AI in recruitment is just a step forward in embracing it, like it was embraced in other areas.
I don’t know what to dooo
I didn't (Applied to their London office - did the VI on 28 Dec)Has anyone heard back from Eversheds post VI?
sorry to hear this! when did you complete the test?Post-test, yes.
congratulations!!! if u don't mind me asking, is the ac invite for the summer vac scheme?HSF AC Invite, if anyone has any advice/insight I would appreciate it greatly