Good question, I have been waiting for over 2 weeksHow long does Sidley usually take to respond to WVS applicants?
Good question, I have been waiting for over 2 weeksHow long does Sidley usually take to respond to WVS applicants?
If you look at their Brochure on their website. It mentions that AC’s will take place late October/early November. I think we should expect to hear back by mid October?How long does Sidley usually take to respond to WVS applicants?
You are describing HFW or Eversheds or SHHey thanks for reading my awfully long post!
What I look for is
1.good variety of practice areas and a choice in picking seat options (Even if not guarantee)
2. International firm with possible international secondment
3. Approachable partners
4. Not having to fight for limited NQ position at the end of a TC
5. London based
6. Good career progression
7. working hours are not a huge deal to me as it comes with the job and it’s fulfilling to me
Is my criteria unrealistic?
Thanks soo much.You are describing HFW or Eversheds or SH
That is for you to find out if they are the firm for youThanks soo much.
would you say the others are a bit of a long shot?
Any firm that has a strict A-level criteria you don’t meet, then possibly. But nothing else should stop you with the other firms. If anything the biggest obstacle you will have is if you start the Bar course.Thanks soo much.
would you say the others are a bit of a long shot?
I think it is really hard to answer questions like this cause it truly depends on the nature and the values of the firm. That is why it is important to do these kind of tests with the a sheet of paper outlining the values of the firms so that you can answer accordingly to what a trainee would do there. One answer might be good for one firm but it might not work for another firm since the culture is different, so I would not necessarily focus on the actual right answer for you, but try to focus on what the values/objectives for a successful trainee at the firm are and reply accordingly. I know it is not the answer you were looking for but my experience with these kind of tests made me understand how it is all about what a lawyer at THAT firm specifically would and how it would be perceived. I hope that helps a bit!I am doing a practice test for SJT and I dont understand this situation and why this is the least effective response.
You are at a client meeting with your partner who doesn't know the answer to the question a client has. You've done the research so you know the answer but hasn't briefed this to the partner yet. The partner said he will get back to the client with the answer after reviewing the information in the meeting.
The least effective answer is that you pass a note to the partner with the information so they can remain in control. I thought the worst would be to speak up and answer the question with confidence.
Can anyone explain this
Mitigating circumstances are definitely taken into account so I would not worry about this. As long as you are able to articulate very well how the former have impacted your grades, and highlight how you managed to graduate with a first class, I am sure they would appreciate that. However, if you are unsure about this I think you are better off asking graduate recruitment about this as they would be able to give you the most appropriate answer for the firm and how they would look at your situation. I would not worry too much and congratulations on your first class, you have achieved so much in your journey and you should be so proud of yourself for that! Good luck with everything! @abnajjHi, @Jessica Booker (or others with experience/knowledge of this): if a firm has AAB A-level requirements and an applicant achieved ACC with mitigating circumstances + a 1st Class LL.B. would their candidacy still be accepted? For instance, Latham & Watkins is a firm I'd like to consider but have been cautious about this. I also understand there are other factors involved in the decision-making process but I would appreciate any insight (or anecdotal experiences with L&W from other candidates)!
I personally have never made that assumption and I always tackled an commercial news that was interested to me and that resonated with me and the firm's excellence in a specific field. I think that as long as the piece of commercial news you want to talk about has these criteria than you are absolutely on the right path, despite of whether it is positive or negative. I hope that will be of help! @SR99Hi everyone! When answering the question 'Describe a current commercial issue that has interested you and explain why it interested you?', do you interpret this as having to discuss a commercial issue that is negative?
If you have mitigating circumstances, I would expect any firm to look past grades. I can’t comment specifically for L&W, but if you are ever unsure, just ask the firm directly about their stance on this.Hi, @Jessica Booker (or others with experience/knowledge of this): if a firm has AAB A-level requirements and an applicant achieved ACC with mitigating circumstances + a 1st Class LL.B. would their candidacy still be accepted? For instance, Latham & Watkins is a firm I'd like to consider but have been cautious about this. I also understand there are other factors involved in the decision-making process but I would appreciate any insight (or anecdotal experiences with L&W from other candidates)!
I would pick two given they have made reference to plural challenges throughout. I would make sure that all aspects of the question are covered for each point, so you may find it challenging to get everything in to the word count.Does anyone have an ideas for the DLA question "what do you anticipate will be the key challenges of the International Training Programme for you? How would you approach these challenges, and what resources or support do you believe you would need to overcome them"?
Should I pick 1-2 challenges to speak about in depth, alongside what i think i would need to help me overcome them?