• Hey Guest, check out Andrei's new guide to building a winning law firm application strategy here. Good luck this cycle :)

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2023-24

Status
Not open for further replies.

bella98

Legendary Member
  • Mar 9, 2023
    222
    894
    Hi- thanks so much this is super helpful information! I was wondering how many questions you got per paragraph to read, is it 2 questions on the same paragraph or 3/4 on the same paragraph? Thanks! :)
    It’s 2 questions on the same paragraph - I recommend taking a practice test! You can find the link to practice in the same email they sent you for the test

    I’m wondering what’s a good score.. does anyone know? (Osborne Clarke verbal reasoning test)
     

    iz1

    Well-Known Member
    Jan 5, 2024
    20
    35
    In the same boat for Freshfields (I'm non-law), expected a PFO - nothing. Did the WG last week - other friend (non-law) who applied was rejected pre-WG and another friend (law) got an AC invite last week. One wonders if there might be another batch of slots coming out?? Ugh, this is really painful.
    Maybe they're too busy with the interviews right now and we're all going to get pfos in like a month 😭
     
    • Wow
    Reactions: Chelsea1

    OliviaPope

    Distinguished Member
    Dec 7, 2023
    72
    123
    In the same boat for Freshfields (I'm non-law), expected a PFO - nothing. Did the WG last week - other friend (non-law) who applied was rejected pre-WG and another friend (law) got an AC invite last week. One wonders if there might be another batch of slots coming out?? Ugh, this is really painful.
    I’m hoping that we’re sort of on hold as we haven’t done super well in WG but haven’t totally failed it either?😭😭 and that they’ll send out more ACs if they’re running them until end of Feb but honestly who knows
     

    axelbeugre

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Junior Lawyer
    Sep 14, 2023
    1,274
    1,721
    Is it necessary to put "training contract offer holder" on Linkedin anyway? I've seen it a lot recently (even vacation scheme offer holder) and I'm genuinely curious about the reason for putting this online - is it to connect with more people at the firm, or something more?
    I do not think there is much explanation for this. I guess that some people just want to showcase the fact that they have done other vacation schemes and have been successful but chose other firms where to qualify to (which I personally do not see anything wrong with), other people are just not comfortable with sharing their offers and so will not include other vacation schemes they have received or training contract offers. It basically comes down to the individual and whether they want to showcase their successes or not. Law firms usually do not request that you put it on LinkedIn so I doubt that it comes from the firms. I personally believe it is genuinely to showcase their experiences and to make it known that they have been successful but ultimately chose another firm.
     

    axelbeugre

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Junior Lawyer
    Sep 14, 2023
    1,274
    1,721
    I talked about Taylor Swift and Barbie but I think I was too conceptual with it 😭😭😭
    I think it works so I would not worry about it. I am sure that you conveyed a genuine interest in the topic and it will be interesting to read answers which differ from the typical corporate and professional standard, even for graduate recruitment, and you never know they might relate heavily with this answer and that might work in your favour!

    Good luck with the application!
     

    bella98

    Legendary Member
  • Mar 9, 2023
    222
    894
    I didn’t do the actual test, with the practice test you get a report ( I assume it will be the same for the actual one and you’ll know your score) but I don’t understand if 70% is a good score or not
    Oh, I found something. I guess if we get anything above 70 we should be okay

    AWell above average90-100
    BAbove average70-89
    CAverage30-69
    DBelow average10-29
    EWell below average0-9
     

    axelbeugre

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Junior Lawyer
    Sep 14, 2023
    1,274
    1,721
    Hi all! When an application asks you to talk about work that the firm has 'done recently,' what counts as recent? I was thinking the last 6 months is fair game, though I'm not completely sure on this. For reference, the deal I am keen to reference was announced in January 2023 but was completed in mid July 2023. I'm slightly scared it's too old! If anyone has any guidance it would be much appreciated! :)
    6 months is definitely valid. I would say that everything that happened from 2022 onwards is fairly recent. It would be more ideal if it is from 2023 onwards but only if you can find something that still works for you and what you want to highlight. I think Jessica confirmed that 1/2 years prior still works as fairly recent. I hope this helps.
     

    axelbeugre

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Junior Lawyer
    Sep 14, 2023
    1,274
    1,721
    @Jessica Booker Hi Jessica! Appreciate some tips about the question "Choose one of our clients and explain a challenge they are currently facing. What could the organisation do to overcome this challenge and how could we assist? "
    Hey @Cynthia14,

    I gave some tips and considerations I would potentially follow when writing the answer for this same question in this post: https://www.thecorporatelawacademy....ns-discussion-thread-2023-24.8037/post-154642
    I hope these are helpful!

    Good luck with the application!
     

    axelbeugre

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Junior Lawyer
    Sep 14, 2023
    1,274
    1,721
    I'm trying to understand the reasoning for it. Is it to prove your loyalty? I can't help but think that if a trainee's development and commercial training was as important as firms make it out to be, then attending additional VSs would be encouraged. I'm very keen to apply to Goodwin, so this isn't to criticise their policy, but I do find it a little odd.
    I personally am no aware of the reasons why but what I can think of is that law firms invest an insane amount of money in our training and I did not think it was a crazy request from my perspective. I had the choice to reject it and do my summer scheme at another US firm, but I genuinely enjoyed the firm so much that I decided to accept. Additionally, everyone on my scheme who got offered the training contract (and also had other law firms' schemes to do in the summer) rejected their other schemes to accept Goodwin, which I personally goes to show you how we all enjoyed our scheme. I just want also preface that this was the case for my scheme, which was the Spring Scheme. The summer scheme was able to do their other vacation schemes as they were allowed since they did not receive their training contract offers later. The spring scheme candidates received their offers in May, so that was the only down side of doing the spring scheme. However, the spring scheme was the one that received the most training contract offers so I personally did not complain and was happy with my decision, but I do understand that it is an interesting approach. Many law firms do take this approach tho and I guess it is only fair to a certain degree.
     

    MrHubertLouis

    Distinguished Member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Aug 5, 2021
    63
    109
    Just realised Osborne Clarke’s application doesn’t have anywhere to explain mitigating circumstances for university education, only school/college? I’m a bit confused as to where to put my MC or if i should include it at all.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: axelbeugre

    axelbeugre

    Legendary Member
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Junior Lawyer
    Sep 14, 2023
    1,274
    1,721
    @Jessica Booker im preparing for a HSF Ac and I attended the Linklaters Ac master class and they said one of the most important things you need to display is a solid reason of “why that firm”. How do I go about making my answer seem highly specialised and my motivations genuine? I’m afraid if I talk about a Practice area or their innovative practices then it is not personable enough.
    I think that choosing the reasons as to why a specific firm is quite personal to a certain degree. You might be attracted to a firm for a specific reason and I might be drawn to that firm but for a completely different reason. What I would highlight in your answers to this motivation question is simply what, through your research about the firm, you have been inspired by or excited about. A practice area is certainly a good reason to wanting to join a specific firm. For instance, since you are applying to HSF, highlighting your interest in disputes and emphasising how HSF's disputes practice distinguishes itself from its competitors for its excellence and prestige is already a very good answer. To make it more personal though, what I would do is link this back to you and your personal experiences. In practice, whilst mentioning my interest in HSF's disputes practice, I would highlight how I have always been interested in the advocacy skills and problem solving skills involved working on compelling contentious cases. This is already a nice way to bring a personal touch to the answer.

    I hope this helps and good luck with your application!
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.