SpringCongratulations. Is this for Winter or Spring?
Hey Guest, do you have a question for graduate recruitment? Gemma Baker from Willkie is live to answer your questions!
SpringCongratulations. Is this for Winter or Spring?
this is Axel's approach to the question https://www.thecorporatelawacademy....ons-discussion-thread-2023-4.8038/post-153137Hey! Found leads on this?
Since when did Macfarlanes have an SJT?Akin and Macfarlanes basically have the same test. 65 questions are SJT. 24 are critical thinking.
If a firm has told you to do it, then I would always do so. It’s better to take any guidance on this from the horse’s mouth, rather than someone else’s opinion.For the work experience section on the Clifford Chance application, are we supposed to link the skills we demonstrate back to commercial law? I can't find any guidance on it, however I do know from the webinars they explicitly said to do so for the competence question.
In my experience, I talked about a commercial issue and link it back to the legal sector and to Goodwin because the issue was very relevant to Goodwin's practice areas. I think that, to some level, a connection could be good, but it is not necessary, especially if the issue you are talking about does not have a direct connection to the legal sector. Additionally, the question does not ask you to directly connect the issue with the legal sector so it is not a requirement per se.Hi @axelbeugre @Jessica Booker I was hoping for some guidance with this commercial awareness question for Goodwin: "Identify a current commercial issue which has attracted your attention recently. Why do you consider it to be significant? Who are the key stakeholders and what are the implications for those concerned?". Should I link the issue to the legal sector/ Goodwin? Or does it want us to only talk about those involved? Thank you!
Hey I just got a pfo. The email said ‘unfortunately we are now at capacity for our winter vacation scheme and cannot transfer your application to another scheme’. No idea if this means they’re really full or will still give out more ACsHas anyone received anymore updates on Simmons & Simmons wvs?
Hey, this is the advice that I gave to someone who asked the same question, I hope that helps:Hey! Found leads on this?
I personally feel like it makes sense to only describe your tasks and responsibilities in the work experience section on law firm applications. The advice that the firm gave you was for the competence question, which makes sense. However, I would talk to future trainees on LinkedIn and see what they have done to make sure you are doing the right think!For the work experience section on the Clifford Chance application, are we supposed to link the skills we demonstrate back to commercial law? I can't find any guidance on it, however I do know from the webinars they explicitly said to do so for the competence question.
Right then haha I should be expecting my PFO at some point todayHey I just got a pfo. The email said ‘unfortunately we are now at capacity for our winter vacation scheme and cannot transfer your application to another scheme’. No idea if this means they’re really full or will still give out more ACs
I wonder if they have issued all WVS places now then.Hey I just got a pfo. The email said ‘unfortunately we are now at capacity for our winter vacation scheme and cannot transfer your application to another scheme’. No idea if this means they’re really full or will still give out more ACs
Thank you, I understand what you mean! Might not have phrased my question clearly enough, since what I was actually wondering about is the work experience section (different from the competence Q). For the work experience section they do not have guidance on whether to link it back to commercial law or not. That is why I wondered, whether I should asusme they want it in this section too (since it was asked for in the comptence Q) or whether no guidance means, just describe the work/skills themselvesIf a firm has told you to do it, then I would always do so. It’s better to take any guidance on this from the horse’s mouth, rather than someone else’s opinion.