I got effective communicator and growth mindset for strengths and detail for weakness.What did everyone get for a Shoosmiths strengths / weakness? I got detail and effective communicator for strengths & I got credibility for weakness lol yikes
I got effective communicator and growth mindset for strengths and detail for weakness.What did everyone get for a Shoosmiths strengths / weakness? I got detail and effective communicator for strengths & I got credibility for weakness lol yikes
@Jessica Booker or others do you perhaps have insight on this?A bit of a stranger question,
Is it normal for partners who interviewed you to not respond to thank you emails
I sent one to them after my AC (it was a generic thank you for your time etc) and did not receive a response or acknowledgement. Is this a bad sign?
Hey, I have an upcoming interview and case study. I would much appreciate It if you can share some insight or some advice regarding the interview. Feel free to DM me.Has anyone heard from Stephenson Harwood / SH post case study
Exceptionally normal. Lawyers often don’t respond to things they don’t need to respond to. Unless your email had anything in it they had to respond to, it’s very normal for them to read it and delete it.A bit of a stranger question,
Is it normal for partners who interviewed you to not respond to thank you emails
I sent one to them after my AC (it was a generic thank you for your time etc) and did not receive a response or acknowledgement. Is this a bad sign?
Strengths- effective communicator and credibilityWhat did everyone get for a Shoosmiths strengths / weakness? I got detail and effective communicator for strengths & I got credibility for weakness lol yikes
Personally I wouldn’t look into what the report says at all.Strengths- effective communicator and credibility
Weakness- personal responsibility (that doesn’t sound good 😭)
"Personality" tests are BS. Just so people know for Simmons they can't weight it that heavy. I scored terribly in relation to their competencies. However the stuff that requires ACTUAL aptitude - numerical/comprehension element I did well on and got through to AC.Personally I wouldn’t look into what the report says at all.
My strengths were adaptability and creditability. Weakness was open connecter for those interested
Hey"Personality" tests are BS. Just so people know for Simmons they can't weight it that heavy. I scored terribly in relation to their competencies. However the stuff that requires ACTUAL aptitude - numerical/comprehension element I did well on and got through to AC.
I got:What did everyone get for a Shoosmiths strengths / weakness? I got detail and effective communicator for strengths & I got credibility for weakness lol yikes
I do not know. I did and got through thoughHey
Does that mean you need to score above average in the numerical and verbal to get through to AC for Simmons.
The general consensus and my experience was it was very conversational and relied heavily on motivational questions and competenciesdoes anyone know if the milbank interview is super technical or not?
That’s good to know - thank youI do not know. I did and got through though
You do not need to mention the VS offer and also there is no way for them to check which other firms you have applied for.I've been offered a VS and have an interview with a different firm this week. However, the two firms have nothing in common. I don't know how to approach the question of where else I've applied. I'm worried if I say I have a VS offer with firm A, it will make me look inconsistent because many of the things that attract me to firm B aren't present at firm A. Does anyone have advice on what is best to do?